Decision making on breech delivery: Information as a way to reconcile maternal autonomy and medical responsibility;Peut-on concilier autonomie maternelle et responsabilité médicale dans les décisions de voies d'accouchement des fœtus en sige ? Rôle de l'information

Gynecologie Obstetrique et Fertilite

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 464-469

  Azria, E ^a,b   Schmitz, T ^c   Bourgeois Moine, A ^a   Goffinet, F ^c   Tsatsaris, V ^c   Mahieu Caputo, D ^a  

^a BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c Université Paris 5 ^*  (France)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Breech delivery; Cesarean delivery; Information; Medical decision

Indexed keywords

BREECH EXTRACTION; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 67849101663     PISSN: 12979589     EISSN: 17696682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2009.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. o 2002-303 du 4 mars 2002 - art. 11, JORF 5 mars 2002.
2. Wachter D.F. Repenser la confiance, l'autonomie et la transparence, in Éthique, médecine et société, dir E. Hirsch. Paris: Vuibert; 2007.
3. E. Azria, V. Tsatsaris, G. Moriette, E. Hirsch, T. Schmitz, and D. Cabrol How to decide with precision, justice, and equity? Reflections on decision-making in the context of extreme prematurity. Part two: Moving toward making the best possible decision: defining conditions for putting decisions into practice J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 36 2007 245 252
4. E. Azria, V. Tsatsaris, G. Moriette, E. Hirsch, T. Schmitz, and D. Cabrol How to decide with precision, justice, and equity? Reflections on decision-making in the context of extreme prematurity. Part one: the problematics of decision-making in the context of extreme prematurity J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 36 2007 238 244
5. R. Favre, N. Duchange, C. Vayssiere, M. Kohler, N. Bouffard, and M.C. Hunsinger How important is consent in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome in France? Information and consent evaluation in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: A French study Prenat Diagn 27 2007 197 205
6. R. Favre, G. Moutel, N. Duchange, C. Vayssiere, M. Kohler, and N. Bouffet What about informed consent in first-trimester ultrasound screening for Down syndrome? Fetal Diagn Ther 23 2008 173 184
7. V. Seror, and Y. Ville Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: Women's involvement in decision-making and their attitudes to screening Prenat Diagn 2009
8. E. Azria, P. Betremieux, L. Caeymaex, T. Debillon, A. Fournie, and M.L. Huillery Information in perinatal medicine: Ethical aspects Arch Pediatr 14 2007 1231 1239
9. S. Goldbeck-Wood Women's autonomy in childbirth Br Med J 314 1997 1143 1144
10. M.E. Hannah, W.J. Hannah, S.A. Hewson, E.D. Hodnett, S. Saigal, and A.R. Willan Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group Lancet 356 2000 1375 1383
11. K.L. Hogle, L. Kilburn, S. Hewson, A. Gafni, R. Wall, and M.E. Hannah Impact of the international term breech trial on clinical practice and concerns: A survey of centre collaborators J Obstet Gynaecol Can 25 2003 14 16
12. C.C. Rietberg, P.M. Elferink-Stinkens, R. Brand, A.J. van Loon, O.J. Van Hemel, and G.H. Visser Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33 824 infants B J Obstet Gynecol 110 2003 604 609
13. C.C. Rietberg, P.M. Elferink-Stinkens, and G.H. Visser The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: An analysis of 35 453 term breech infants B J Obstet Gynecol 112 2005 205 209
14. O. Alexandersson, M. Bixo, and U. Hogberg Evidence-based changes in term breech delivery practice in Sweden Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84 2005 584 587
15. M. Carayol, B. Blondel, J. Zeitlin, G. Breart, and F. Goffinet Changes in the rates of caesarean delivery before labour for breech presentation at term in France: 1972-2003 Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 132 2007 20 26
16. R. Isaksson, M. Gissler, and A. Tiitinen Obstetric outcome among women with unexplained infertility after IVF: a matched case-control study Hum Reprod 17 2002 1755 1761
17. F. Goffinet, B. Blondel, and G. Breart Breach presentation: questions raised by the controlled trial by Hannah et al. on systematic use of cesarean section for breach presentations J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 30 2001 187 190
18. A. Kotaska Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery Br Med J 329 2004 1039 1042
19. M. Glezerman Five years to the term breech trial: The rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 2006 20 25
20. H. Whyte, M.E. Hannah, S. Saigal, W.J. Hannah, S. Hewson, and K. Amankwah Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: The International Randomized Term Breech Trial Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 2004 864 871 (Pubitemid 39298124)
21. F. Goffinet, M. Carayol, J.M. Foidart, S. Alexander, S. Uzan, and D. Subtil Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 2006 1002 1011
22. R. Porter Breech delivery: The dilemma B J Obstet Gynecol 113 2006 973 974
23. B. Carbonne, F. Goffinet, G. Breart, R. Frydman, B. Maria, and S. Uzan The debate on breach presentation: Delivery of breach presentations: the position of the National College of French gynecologists J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 30 2001 191 192
24. J. Delotte, C. Schumacker-Blay, A. Bafghi, P. Lehmann, and A. Bongain Medical information and patients' choices. Influences on term singleton breech deliveries Gynecol Obstet Fertil 35 2007 747 750
25. P. Slovic The perception of risk 2000 Earthscan London
26. H. Jonas Le principe de responsabilité : une éthique pour la civilisation technologique 1990 Éditions du Cerf Paris
27. C. Deneux-Tharaux, E. Carmona, M.H. Bouvier-Colle, and G. Breart Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery Obstet Gynecol 108 2006 541 548
28. S. Liu, R.M. Liston, K.S. Joseph, M. Heaman, R. Sauve, and M.S. Kramer Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk Planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term Can Med Assoc J 176 2007 455 460
29. R. Kennare, G. Tucker, A. Heard, and A. Chan Risks of adverse outcomes in the next birth after a first cesarean delivery Obstet Gynecol 109 2007 270 276
30. R.M. Silver, M.B. Landon, D.J. Rouse, K.J. Leveno, C.Y. Spong, and E.A. Thom Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries Obstet Gynecol 107 2006 1226 1232
31. V. Nisenblat, S. Barak, O.B. Griness, S. Degani, G. Ohel, and R. Gonen Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries Obstet Gynecol 108 2006 21 26