Landslide-related ruptures of the Camisea pipeline system, Peru

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 251-259

  Lee, E M ^a   Audibert, J M E ^b   Hengesh, J V ^c,d   Nyman, D J ^a  

^a Quest Geo Technics ^*  (United States)

^b Quest Geo Technics   (United States)

^c William Lettis and Associates Inc   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMAZON JUNGLE; BURIED PIPELINES; GAS FIELDS; KEY ISSUES; LANDSLIDE MOVEMENTS; NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS; OPERATING COMPANIES; PIPE-LINE SYSTEMS; PIPELINE DAMAGE; ROUTE SELECTION; SUPPORT DESIGN;

GAS INDUSTRY; LANDSLIDES; NATURAL GAS; PIPING SYSTEMS; WATER PIPELINES;

PIPELINES;

BURIED STRUCTURE; CONSTRUCTION METHOD; DAMAGE; DESIGN; GAS FIELD; GAS PIPELINE; GEOLOGICAL HAZARD; LANDSLIDE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RUPTURE;

ANDES; CENTRAL AMERICA; COSTA RICA; PACIFIC COAST [COSTA RICA]; SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 67749147126     PISSN: 14709236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1144/1470-9236/08-061     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ASME 1995. Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems, ANSI Standard B31.8. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
2. ASME 2002. Pipeline Transportation Systems for Liquid Hydrocarbons and Other Liquids, ASME B31.4-2002. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
3. CHAN, P.D.S. & WONG, R.C.K. 2004. Performance evaluation of a buried steel pipe in a moving slope: A case study. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 41, 894-907.
4. COGA 2007. Rainfall data of the pluviometric seasons located along the Camisea gas pipeline for 2006. Compañia Operadora de Gas del Amazons, Lima, Peru.
5. ESFORD, F., PORTER, M., SAVIGNY, K.W., MUHLBAUER, W.K. & DUNLOP, C. 2004. A risk assessment model for pipelines exposed to natural hazards. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Pipeline Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. IPC04-0327.
6. GARCIA-LÓPEZ, M. & AMÓRTEGUI, J.V. 2005. Evolution of mountainous pipeline design in Colombia. In: SWEENEY, M. (ed.) Terrain and Geohazards Challenges Facing Onshore Oil and Gas Pipelines. Thomas Telford, London, 459-467.
7. GASCA, A. & SWEENEY, M. 2005. Pipelining in rugged terrain: costs, cost drivers and routing principles. In: SWEENEY, M. (ed.) Terrain and Geohazards Challenges Facing Onshore Oil and Gas Pipelines. Thomas Telford, London, 549-564.
8. GERMANISCHER-LLOYD 2007. Integrity Audit of the Natural Gas Transportation Systems and Natural Gas Liquids of the Camisea Project, Final Report to the Ministry of Energy and Mines of Peru [in Spanish]. World Wide Web Address: Http://www.minem.gob.pe/hidrocarburos/ auditoriam_caisea.asp.
9. HENGESH, J.V., ANGELL, M., LETTIS, W.R. & BACHHUBER, J.L. 2004. A systematic approach for mitigating geohazards in pipeline design and construction. In: Proceedings of IPC 2004 International Pipeline Conference, 4-8 October 2004, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. IPC04-0147.
10. IDB 2007. Camisea Project Benefits. Inter-American Development Bank. World Wide Web Address: Http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/ getdocument.aspx?docnum=980596.
11. LOTTER, M., CHARMAN, J.H., LEE, E.M., HENGESH, J.V., SHILSTON, D.T. & POSCHER, G. 2005. Geohazard assessment of a major crude oil pipeline system - the Turkish section of the BTC pipeline route. In: SWEENEY, M. (ed.) Terrain and Geohazards Challenges Facing Onshore Oil and Gas Pipelines. Thomas Telford, London, 301-310.
12. PORTER, M., LOGUE, C., SAVIGNY, K.W., ESFORD, F. & BRUCE, I. 2004. Estimating the influence of natural hazards on pipeline risk and system reliability. In: Proceedings of IPC 2004 International Pipeline Conference, 4-8 October 2004, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. IPC04-0238.
13. RAJANI, B.B., ROBERTSON, P.K. & MORGENSTERN, N.R. 1995. Simplified design methods for pipelines subject to transverse and longitudinal soil movements. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 32, 309-323.
14. SAVIGNY, K.W., PORTER, M. & LEIR, M. 2005. Geohazard risk management for the onshore pipeline industry. Business Briefing: Exploration and Production. Oil and Gas Review, 2, 1-3.
15. SWEENEY, M. (ed.) 2005a. Terrain and Geohazard Challenges Facing Onshore Oil and Gas Pipelines. Thomas Telford, London, 37-51.
16. SWEENEY, M. 2005b. Terrain and geohazard challenges facing onshore oil and gas pipelines: Historic risks and modern responses. In: SWEENEY, M. (ed.) Terrain and Geohazards Challenges Facing Onshore Oil and Gas Pipelines. Thomas Telford, London, 37-51.
17. SWEENEY, M., GASCA, A.H., GARCIA-LOPEZ, M. & PALMER, A.C. 2005. Pipelines and landslides in rugged terrain: A database, historic risks and pipeline vulnerability. In: SWEENEY, M. (ed.) Terrain and Geohazards Challenges Facing Onshore Oil and Gas Pipelines. Thomas Telford, London, 641-660.
18. WP/WLI 1995. A suggested method of a landslide summary. International Geotechnical Societies' UNESCO Working Party for World Landslide Inventory. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology, 43, 101-110.