Ground deformation in an area later damaged by an earthquake: Monitoring the Avcilar district of Istanbul, Turkey, by satellite radar interferometry 1992-1999

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 178, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 976-988

  Akarvardar, Samuray ^a   Feigl, Kurt L ^b   Ergintav, Semih ^c  

^a IRAP   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c MATERIALS INSTITUTE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Earthquake ground motions; Hydrogeophysics; Radar interferometry; Rheology and friction of fault zones; Site effects

Indexed keywords

DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; GROUND MOTION; KOCAELI EARTHQUAKE 1999; RADAR INTERFEROMETRY; RHEOLOGY; SITE EFFECT; SUBSIDENCE;

EURASIA; ISTANBUL [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 67749142147     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04126.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Akarvardar, S.E., 2007. Subsidence around Istanbul, Turkey measured by satellite radar interferometry, PhD thesis, Universite Paul Sabatier, Toulouse and Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul.
2. Aktar, M. & Browitt, C., 2006. Vulnerability mapping Istanbul, in Proceedings of the GMES Terrafirma Workshop 3, ESRIN, Frascati, Italy.
3. Alparslan, E., Yuce, H., Erkan, B., Inan, S., Ergintav, S. & Saatcilar, R., 2006. Multi-criteria analysis of landslides susceptibility in the area between the Buyukcekmece and Kucukcekmece lakes of Istanbul City using remote sensing and GIS (in Turkish), in Proceedings of the 4th GIS Days, Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey.
4. Armijo, R., Meyer, B., Navarro, S., King, G. & Barka, A., 2002. Asymmetric slip partitioning in the Sea of Marmara pull-apart: A clue to propagation processes of the North Anatolian Fault, Terra Nova, 14, 80-86.
5. Aydan, O., Ulusay, R. & Atak, V., 2008. Evaluation of ground deformations induced by the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake (Turkey) at selected sites on shorelines, Environ. Geol., 54, 165-182.
6. Beauducel, F., Briole, P. & Froger, J.L., 2000. Volcano wide fringes in ERS synthetic aperture radar interferograms of Etna: Deformation or tropospheric effect?, J. geophys. Res., 105, 316 391-316 402.
7. Bishop, K.M. & Day, R.W., 1995. Case study of Northridge earthquake-induced fill settlement; discussion and reply, Environ. Eng. Geosci., 1, 507-508.
8. Cagatay, I.H., 2005. Experimental evaluation of buildings damaged in recent earthquakes in Turkey, Eng. Fail. Anal., 12, 440-452.
9. Cattin, R., Briole, P., Lyon-Caen, H., Bernard, P. & Pinettes, P., 1999. Effects of superficial layers on coseismic displacements for a dip-slip fault and geophysical implications, Geophys. J. Int., 137, 149-158.
10. Cervelli, P., Murray, M.H., Segall, P., Aoki, Y. & Kato, T., 2001. Estimating source parameters from deformation data, with an application to the March 1997 earthquake swarm off the Izu Peninsula, Japan, J. geophys. Res, 106, 11 217-11 237.
11. s = 6.6), J. Geodyn., 26, 393-411.
12. CNES, 1998. Philosophy & Instructions for use of the DIAPASON Interferometry Software System Developed at CNES, Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales, Toulouse, France, 62 pp. 62 pp.
13. CNES, 2006. PRISME/DIAPASON Software Package, Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales, Toulouse, France.
14. Colesanti, C., Ferretti, A., Novali, F., Prati, C. & Rocca, F., 2003. SAR monitoring of progressive and seasonal ground deformation using the permanent scatterers technique, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 41, 1685-1701.
15. Doyle, B.C. & Rogers, J.D., 2005. Seismically Induced Lateral Spread Features in the Western New Madrid Seismic Zone.
16. Duman, T.Y. et al., 2004. Geological Data of Urban Development Areas (Kucukcekmece-Silivri-Catalca Vicinities) in the western of Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (in Turkish), MTA Special Publication, MTA, Ankara, Turkey.
17. Duman, T.Y., Can, T., Ulusoy, R., Kecer, M., Emre, O., Ates, S. & Gedik, I., 2005a. A Geohazard reconnaissance study based on geosceintific information for development needs of the western region of Istanbul (Turkey), Environ. Geol., 48, 871-888.
18. Duman, T.Y., Can, T., Gokceoglu, C. & Nefeslioglu, H.A., 2005b. Landslide susceptibility mapping of Cekmece area (Istanbul, Turkey) by conditional probability, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 2, 155-208.
19. ELC, 2005. Vulnerability Assessment to Land Movements in the South of Ambarli District of Avcilar County of Istanbul (in Turkish), ELC Group Consulting and Engineering, Istanbul.
20. Ergin, M., Ozalaybey, S., Aktar, M. & Yalcin, M.N., 2004. Site amplification at Avcilar, Istanbul, Tectonophysics, 391, 335-346.
21. Ergintav, S. et al., 2007. A Snapshot (2003 - 2005) of the 3D Postseismic Deformations for the 1999, M = 7.4 Izmit earthquake in the Marmara Region, Turkey by First Results of Joint Gravity and GPS Monitoring, J. Geodyn., 44, 1-18.
22. Feigl, K.L. & Thurber, C.H., 2009. A technique for modeling radar interferograms without phase unwrapping: Application to the M 5 Fawnskin, California earthquake of 4 December 1992, Geophys. J. Int., 176, 491-504.
23. Ferretti, A., Prati, C. & Rocca, F., 2000. Nonlinear subsidence rate estimation using permanent scatterers in differential SAR interferometry, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 38, 2202-2212.
24. Ferretti, A., Prati, C. & Rocca, F., 2001. Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 39, 8-20.
25. w 7.3 Landers earthquake, J. geophys. Res. (Solid Earth), 109, B 08401.
26. Field, E.H., Johnson, P.A., Beresnev, I.A. & Zeng, Y., 1997. Nonlinear ground-motion amplification by sediments during the 1994 Northridge earthquake, Nature, 390, 599-602.
27. Field, N., Jones, L., Jordan, T., Benthien, M., Wald, L. & Cagatay, I.H., 2001. Earthquake shaking: Finding the "Hotspots": experimental evaluation of buildings damaged in recent earthquakes in Turkey, Eng. Fail. Anal., 12, 440-452.
28. Franks, C.A.M., Beetham, R.D. & Salt, G.A., 1989. Ground damage and seismic response resulting from the 1987 Edgecumbe earthquake, New Zealand, N.Z. J. Geol. Geophys., 32, 135-144.
29. Goldstein, R., 1995. Atmospheric limitations to repeat-track radar interferometry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 2517-2520.
30. Goldstein, R.M. & Werner, C.L., 1998. Radar interferogram filtering for geophysical applications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 4035-4038.
31. Hanssen, R.F., 2001. Radar Interferometry: Data Interpretation and Error Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
32. Holzer, T.L., 1994. Predicting earthquake effects-learning from Northridge and Loma Prieta, Science, 265, 1182-1183.
33. Holzer, T.L., Bennett, M.J., Ponti, D.J. & Tinsley III, J.C., 1999. Liquefaction and Soil Failure During 1994 Northridge Earthquake, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviromental Engineering, 125, 438-452.
34. Iida, M., 1999. 3D analysis of S-wave propagation in soft deposits, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 125, 727-740.
35. IMM & JICA, 2002. The study on a disaster prevention/mitigation basic plan in Istanbul including microzonation in The Republic of Turkey: Final Report (in Turkish), Vol. 5, Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality and Japan International Cooperation Agency, Istanbul.
36. Kalkan, Y., Alkan, R., Baykal, M.O., Yanalak, M., Erden ve T. & Yildirim, H., 2003. Monitoring of landslides by geodetic and geotechnical methods: An application at Ambarli Port area (in Turkish). in Proceedings of the 1st National Symposium of Engineering Surveys, Istanbul, pp. 91-105.
37. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D., Jr. & Vecchi, M.P., 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing, Science, 220, 671-680.
38. Le Pichon, X., Chamot-Rooke, N., Rangin, C. & Sengor, A.M.C., 2003. The North Anatolian fault in the Sea of Marmara, J. geophys. Res (Solid Earth), 108(B4), ETG 1-1.
39. Lyons, S.N., Bock, Y. & Sandwell, D.T., 2002. Creep along the Imperial Fault, southern California, from GPS measurements, J. geophys. Res., 107, ETG 12-11-ETG 12-13.
40. Mardia, K.V., 1972. Statistics of Directional Data, Academic Press, New York.
41. Massonnet, D. & Feigl, K.L., 1995. Discriminating geophysical phenomena in satellite radar interferograms, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1537-1540.
42. Massonnet, D. & Feigl, K.L., 1998. Radar interferometry and its application to changes in the Earth's surface, Rev. Geophys., 36, 441-500.
43. Massonnet, D. & Rabaute, T., 1993. Radar interferometry: Limits and potential, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 31, 455-464.
44. Massonnet, D., Rossi, M. & Adragna, F., 1994. CNES General-purpose SAR correlator, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 32, 636-643.
45. Mogi, K., 1958. Relations between the eruption of various volcanoes and the deformations of the ground surfaces around them, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., 36, 99-134.
46. Ormeci, C., 1972. Study of Mass Movements by Photogrammetry (in Turkish), Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
47. w 6.5 earthquakes in South Iceland estimated from joint inversion of InSAR and GPS measurements, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 213, 487-502.
48. Polonia, A. et al., 2002. Exploring submarine earthquake geology in the Marmara Sea: Slip rate of the North Anatolian Fault and geological record of earthquakes, in Proceedings of the EGS XXVII General Assembly, Nice, 2002 April 21-26, abstract 4599, 4599 pp.
49. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A. & Vetterling, W.T., 1992. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
50. Reilinger, R. et al., 2006. GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa-Arabia-Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions, J. geophys. Res. (Solid Earth), 111, B05411.
51. Scharroo, R. & Visser, P., 1998. Precise orbit determination and gravity field improvement for the ERS satellites, J. geophys. Res., 103, 8113-8128.
52. Strang, G. & Borre, K., 1997. Linear Algebra, Geodesy, and GPS, Wellesley-Cambridge Press, Wellesley, MA.
53. Tezcan, S.S., Kaya, E., Bal, E. & Ozdemir, Z., 2002. Seismic amplification at Avcilar, Istanbul, Eng. Struct., 24, 661-667.
54. Tinti, S., Armigliato, A., Manucci, A., Pagnoni, G., Zaniboni, F., Yalciner, A.C. & Altinok, Y., 2006. The generating mechanisms of the August 17, 1999 Izmit Bay (Turkey) Tsunami; regional (tectonic) and local (mass instabilities) causes, Mar. Geol., 225, 311-330.
55. TUIK, 2000. Census of Population, State Institute of Statistics, Prime Ministry, Republic of Turkey, Ankara.
56. Tuttle, M. & Barstow, N., 1996. Liquefaction-related ground failure; a case study in the New Madrid seismic zone, central United States, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 86, 636-645.
57. Williams, S., Bock, Y. & Fang, P., 1998. Integrated satellite interferometry: Tropospheric noise, GPS estimates, and implications for interferometric synthetic aperture radar products, J. geophys. Res., 103, 27 051-27 068.
58. Zebker, H.A., Rosen, P.A. & Hensley, S., 1997. Atmospheric effects in interferometric synthetic aperture radar surface deformation and topographic maps, J. geophys. Res., 102, 7547-7563. and topographic maps