The selection of high-impact health informatics literature: A comparison of results between the content expert and the expert searcher

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 97, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 212-218

  Whipple, Elizabeth C ^a   McGowan, Julie J ^b   Dixon, Brian E ^c   Zafar, Atif ^b  

^a Ruth Lilly Medical Library   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c REGENSTRIEF INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERT SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LIBRARIAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PEER REVIEW; PERSONNEL; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MEDICINE; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; MEDICAL INFORMATICS;

EID: 67749095038     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.3.010     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Hölscher M, Strube G. Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies. Intl J Comput Telecomm Netw. 2000 Jun;33(1-6):337-346 (Pubitemid 30875427)
2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, National Resource Center for Health Information Technology. Health IT bibliography: top resources for key topics [Internet] The Center [rev. 13 Mar 2008; cited 21 Aug 2008]. 〈http://www.healthit.ahrq.gov/portal/server.pt?open5512&objID5 653&&PageID512790&mode52&in-hi-userid53882&cached5 true〉.
3. Dixon BE. The landscape of the AHRQ Health Information Technology Portfolio. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:912.
4. Romano PS, Geppert JJ, Davies S, Miller MR, Elixhauser A, McDonald KM. A national profile of patient safety in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Mar- Apr;22(2):154-166
5. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ quality indicators-patient safety indicators: software documentation. Rockville, MD: The Agency; 2002.
6. Fitzmaurice JM, Adams K, Eisenberg JM. Three decades of research on computer applications in health care: medical informatics support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 Mar-Apr; 9(2):144-160 (Pubitemid 34893807)
7. McKibbon KA, Haynes RB, Dilks CJ, Ramsden MF, Ryan NC, Baker L, Flemming T, Fitzgerald D. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? a comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Comput Biomed Res. 1990 Dec;23(6):583-593
8. Task Force on Expert Searching, Medical Library Association. Medical Library Association policy statement: role of expert searching in health sciences libraries [Internet]. Chicago, IL: The Association [Sep 2003; cited 7 Sep 2008]. 〈http://www.mlanet.org/resources/expert-search/policy-expert- search.html〉.
9. Davidoff F, Florance V. The informationist: a new health profession? Ann Int Med. 2000 Jun;132(12):996-998 (Pubitemid 30397602)
10. Arnott Smith C. An evolution of experts: MEDLINE in the library school. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Jan;93(1):53-60.
11. McLellan F. 1966 and all that-when is a literature search done? Lancet. 2001 Aug 25;358(9282):646. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05826-3.