The cost and benefits of biofuels: A review of recent peer-reviewed research and a sociological look ahead

Environmental Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 17-24

  Carolan, Michael S ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; LITERATURE REVIEW;

EID: 67749094910     PISSN: 14660466     EISSN: 14660474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1466046609090024     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Beer, T., and T. Grant. 2007. Life Cycle Analysis of Emission from Fuel Ethanol and Blends in Australian Heavy and Light Vehicles. Journal of Cleaner Production 15:833-7.
2. Belasco, W. 2006. Meals to Come: A History of the Future of Food. University of California Press, Berkeley.
3. Biospectrum. 2008. India, China Move Up in E&Y Biofuels Investment Sweepstakes. In Biospectrum: Asia Edition, March 28. Also available at http://www.biospectrumasia.com/content/280308IND5877.asp. Last accessed April 1.
4. Blottnitz, H., and M. Curran. 2007. A Review of Assessments Conducted on Bio-Ethanol as a Transportation Fuel from a Net Energy, Greenhouse Gas, and Environmental Life Cycle Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 15:607-19.
5. Boddiger, D. 2007. Boosting Biofuel Crops Could Threaten Food Security. The Lancet 370(9591):923-4.
6. Carolan, M. 2006. Scientific Knowledge and Environmental Policy: Why Science Needs Values. Environmental Sciences 3(4):229-37.
7. Carolan,M. 2008. The Bright- and Blind-Spots of Science:WHy Objective Knowledge is Not Enough to Resolve Environmental Controversies. Critical Sociology 34(5):725-40.
8. Fargione, J., J. Hill, D. Tilman, S. Polasky, and P. Hawthorne. 2008. Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt. Science 319:1235-8.
9. Gangadharan, A., and A. Larcadas. 2007. US Lifting of Tariff on Brazil Ethanol Might Spell Trouble for Amazon and Sugarcane Cutters. Brazzil Magazine August 27. Available at http://www.brazzil.com/ index2.php?option5com_content&do_pdf51&id59960. Last accessed March 24, 2008.
10. Geels, F. 2005. The Dynamics of Transitions in Socio-Technical Systems: A Multi-Level Analysis of the Transition Pathway from Horse-Drawn Carriages to Automobiles (1860-30). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17(4):445-476.
11. Grain. 2007. Corporate Power: Agrofuels and the Expansion of Agribusiness. GRAIN, July. Available at http://www.grain.org/ seedling/?id=478. Last accessed March 22, 2008.
12. Harvey, D. 2004. Policy Dependency and Reform: Economic Gains versus Political Pains. Agricultural Economics 31:265-75.
13. Hettinga, W., H. Junginger, S. Dekker, M. Hoogwijk, A. McAloon, and K. Hicks. In press. Understanding the Reductions in US Corn Ethanol Production Costs: An Experience Curve Approach. Energy Policy (in press).
14. Kay, A. 2003. Path Dependency and the CAP. Journal of European Public Policy 10(3):405-20.
15. Law, M., J. Tonon, and G.Miller. 2008. Earmarked: The Political Economy of Agricultural Research Appropriations. Review of Agricultural Economics 30(2):194-213.
16. Leng, R., C.Wang, C. Zhang, D. Dai, and G. Pu. 2008. Life Cycle Inventory and Energy Analysis of Cassava-Based Fuel Ethanol in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 16:374-84.
17. Mahoney, J. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 29:507-48.
18. Mielenz, J. 2001. Ethanol Production from Biomass: Technology and Commercialization Status. Current Opinion in Microbiology 4(3):324-9.
19. Mousdale, D. 2008. Biofuels: Biotechnology, Chemistry, and Sustainable Development. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
20. National Center for Policy Analysis. 2002. Ethanol Subsidies. Idea House, National Center for Policy Analysis. Available at http://www.ncpa.org/pd/ag/ag6.html. Last accessed March 30, 2008.
21. Nguyen, T., and S. Gheewala. 2008. Fossil Energy, Environmental and Cost Performance of Ethanol in Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production 16:1814-21.
22. Patzek, T. 2007. A First-Law Thermodynamic Analysis of the Corn-Ethanol Cycle. Natural Resources Research 15(4):255-70.
23. Pimentel, D. 2003. Ethanol Fuels: Energy Balance, Economics, and Environmental Impacts Are Negative. Natural Resources Research 12(2):127-34.
24. Pimentel, D., and T. Patzek. 2007. Ethanol Production: Energy and Economic Issues Related to US and Brazilian Sugarcane. Natural Resources Research 16(3):235-42.
25. Pimentel, D., and M. Pimentel. 1996. Food, Energy, and Society. Colorado University Press, Boulder.
26. Raynes, E. 2007. The Larger Story: Sugar Cane Workers and Ethanol. Center for Documentary Studies, Duke University, Durham, NC. Available at http://cds.aas.duke.edu/hine/raynes.html. Last accessed March 11, 2008.
27. Reijnders, L., and M. Huijbregts. 2008. Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases. Journal of Cleaner Energy 16:377-832.
28. Runge, C., and B. Senauer. 2007. How Biofuels Could Starve the Poor. Foreign Affairs 86(3). Also available at http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20070501faessay86305/ c-ford-runge-benjamin-senauer/how-biofuels-couldstarve-the-poor.html. Last accessed December 12, 2007.
29. Searchinger, T., R. Heimlich, R. Houghton, F. Dong, A. Elobeid, J. Fabiosa, S. Tokgoz, D. Hayes, and T. Yu. 2008. Use of US Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases through Emissions from Land-Use Change. Science 319:1238-40.
30. Smith, M., and C. Caminda. 2007. Ethanol's Deadly Brew. Bloomberg.com October 4. Available at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/marketsmag/mm_1107_story3.html#. Last accessed March 24, 2008.
31. Stefano, F., and L. Andrade. 2006. George Soros Ataca No Campo. Dinheiro Rural, October (24). Available at http://www.terra.com.br/revistadinheirorural/capa24.htm. Last accessed March 24, 2008.
32. Tauli-Corpuz, V., and P. Tamang. 2007. Oil Palm and Other Commercial Tree Plantations, Monocropping and the Impacts on Indigenous Peoples' Land Tenure and Resource Management Systems and Livelihoods. Special Rapporteur, United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, May. Available at http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/ 6session_crp6.doc. Last accessed March 24, 2008.
33. Tilman, D., J. Hill, and C. Lehman. 2006. Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass. Science 314:1598-1600.
34. Topgul, T., H. Yucesu, C. Cinar, and A. Koca. 2006. The Effects of Ethanol-Unleaded Gasoline Blends and Ignition Timing on Engine Performance and Exhaust Emissions. Renewable Energy 31:2534-42.
35. Unruh, G. 2000. Understanding Carbon Lock In. Energy Policy 28:817-30.
36. US Department of Agriculture. 2006. China, Peoples Republic of Bio-Fuels: An Alternative Future for Agriculture 2006. US Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, GAIN (Global Agriculture Information Network) Report, August 8. Available at http://www.fas.usda.gov/gainfiles/200608/146208611.pdf. Last accessed April 1, 2008.
37. Wilmar International. 2006. News Release: Wilmar Set to Be Asia's Leading Agribusiness Group through US$4.3 Billion Planned Merger and Restructuring. Wilmar International Limited, News Release, December. Available at http://www.wilmar-international.com/news/press_releases/ WilmarPressRelease14.12.06.pdf. Last accessed March 24, 2008.
38. Zacharias, A. 2005. Shuck the Sheiks. Universe, New York.