Critical literacy and web 2.0: Exercising and negotiating power

Computers in the Schools

Volumn 25, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 259-274

  McLeod, Julie ^a,b   Vasinda, Sheri ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^b Allen Independent School District   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom examples; Critical literacy; Definitions; Dynamic; Multiple perspectives; Power; Web 2.0; Wiki

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOM EXAMPLES; CRITICAL LITERACY; DEFINITIONS; MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES; POWER; WEB 2.0; WIKI;

DYNAMICS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 67651244122     PISSN: 07380569     EISSN: 15287033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07380560802394815     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Australian Department of Education, Science and Training (2002) MyRead
2. Church, G. W. (1997) The significance of Louise Rosenblatt on the field of teaching literature. Inquiry, pp. 71-77.
3. Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed, Continuum, New York
4. Freire, P. (1997) Pedagogy of the oppressed, Continuum, New York
5. Friedman, T. (2006) The world is flat [updated and expanded]: A brief history of the twenty-first century, Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New York
6. Gee, J. P. (2001) Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, pp. 714-725.
7. Giles, J. (2005) Internet encyclopedias go head to head. Nature, pp. 900-901.
8. Green, P. (2001) Critical literacy revisited. Critical literacy: A collection of articles from the Australian Literacy Educators' Association, pp. 7-14. International Reading Association, Newark, DE
9. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, New York
10. Lowell, S. (1992) The three little javalinas, Rising Moon Books, Flagstaff, AZ
11. Luke, A. and Freebody, P. (1999) Further notes on the four resources model. Reading Online
12. McLaughlin, M. and DeVoogd, G. (2004) Critical literacy: Enhancing students' comprehension of text, Scholastic, New York
13. O'Reilly, T. (2005) What is Web 2.0
14. Richardson, W. (2006) Blogs, wikis, podcasts and other powerful Web tools for the classroom, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA
15. Rosenblatt, L. (1938) Literature as exploration, Appleton-Century, New York
16. Schmocker, M. (2006) Results now, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA
17. School of Information Management and Systems, University of California (2000) How much information, Author, Berkeley, CA
18. Schwartz, D., Lin, X., Brophy, S. and Bransford, J. (1999) Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. Instructional design theories and models, 2, pp. 183-213. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
19. Scieszka, J. (1999) The true story of the three little pigs by A. Wolf, Penguin, New York
20. Squire, J. R. (1994) Research in reader response, naturally interdisciplinary. Theoretical models and processes of reading ed., pp. 637-652. International Reading Association, Newark, DE
21. Surowiecki, J. (2004) The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economics, societies and nations, Doubleday, New York
22. Tapscott, D. and Williams, A. (2006) Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything, Penguin Group, New York
23. Texas Education Agency Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills - third grade
24. Trivizas, E. (1997) The three little wolves and the big bad pig, Aladdin, New York
25. Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
26. Vygotsky, L. (1987) Thought and language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
27. Wallis, C. and Steptoe, S. (2006) How to build a student for the 21st century. Time Magazine
28. Warlick, D. F. (2004) Redefining literacy for the 21st century, Linworth, Worthington, OH
29. Wikipedia Talk:CRitical literacy
30. Wikipedia Talk:WEb 2.0.