Clinical and laboratory evaluation of peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 86, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 492-502

  Giorgi, Robert G ^a   Woods, Russell L ^a   Peli, Eli ^a  

^a SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Low vision; Prism adaptation; Prism treatment; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Traumatic brain injury; Visual impairment

Indexed keywords

LOW VISION; PRISM ADAPTATION; REHABILITATION; STROKE; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

ABERRATIONS; BRAIN; EYEGLASSES; GLASS; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS; PRISMS; VISION;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOMONYMOUS HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRISM; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPECTACLES; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; COGNITION; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; EYEGLASSES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMIANOPSIA; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 67651162164     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31819f9e4d     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Zhang X, Kedar S, Lynn MJ, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases. Neurology 2006;66:906-910 (Pubitemid 43739768)
2. Williams GR, Jiang JG, Matchar DB, Samsa GP. Incidence and occurrence of total (first-ever and recurrent) stroke. Stroke 1999;30:2523-2528
3. Rossi PW, Kheyfets S, Reding MJ. Fresnel prisms improve visual perception in stroke patients with homonymous hemianopia or unilateral visual neglect. Neurology 1990;40:1597-1599 (Pubitemid 20351357)
4. Zhang X, Kedar S, Lynn MJ, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Natural history of homonymous hemianopia. Neurology 2006;66:901-905
5. Kerkhoff G, Munssinger U, Haaf E, Eberlestrauss G, Stogerer E. Rehabilitation of homonymous scotomas in patients with postgeniculate damage of the visual system: saccadic compensation training. Restor Neurol Neurosci 1992;4:245-254
6. Kerkhoff G, Munssinger U, Meier EK. Neurovisual rehabilitation in cerebral blindness. Arch Neurol 1994;51:474-481
7. Zihl J. Eye movement patterns in hemianopic dyslexia. Brain 1995; 118(Pt 4):891-912.
8. Pambakian AL, Kennard C. Can visual function be restored in patients with homonymous hemianopia? Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:324-328
9. Kasten E, Wust S, Behrens-Baumann W, Sabel BA. Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness. Nat Med 1998;4:1083-1087 (Pubitemid 28417345)
10. Cohen JM, Waiss B, Visual field remediation. In: Cole RG, Rosenthal BP, eds. Remediation and Management of Low Vision. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996:1-25.
11. Gottlieb DD, Allen CH, Eikenberry J, Ingall-Woodruff S, Johnson M. Living with Vision Loss. Atlanta, GA: St. Barthelemy Press, Ltd.; 1996.
12. Gottlieb DD, Fuhr A, Hatch WV, Wright KD. Neuro-optometric facilitation of vision recovery after acquired brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 1998;11:175-199 (Pubitemid 28519976)
13. Peli E. Field expansion for homonymous hemianopia by optically induced peripheral exotropia. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:453-464 (Pubitemid 30727754)
14. Szlyk JP, Seiple W, Stelmack J, McMahon T. Use of prisms for navigation and driving in hemianopic patients. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005;25:128-135 (Pubitemid 41702455)
15. Kohler I. The formation and transformation of the visual world. Psychol Issues 1964;3:1-173.
16. Haynes B. Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it? BMJ 1999;319: 652-653
17. Demer JL, Goldberg J, Porter FI, Schmidt K. Validation of physiologic predictors of successful telescopic spectacle use in low vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:2826-2834
18. Back A, Grant T, Hine N. Comparative visual performance of three presbyopic contact lens corrections. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:474-480
19. Back AP, Holden BA, Hine NA. Correction of presbyopia with contact lenses: comparative success rates with three systems. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66:518-525
20. Gauthier CA, Holden BA, Grant T, Chong MS. Interest of presbyopes in contact lens correction and their success with monovision. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:858-862 (Pubitemid 23011133)
21. Greene HA, Pekar J, Beadles R, Gottlob LL. The development of the Ocutech VES-autofocus telescope and a future binocular version. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:297-303. (Pubitemid 32493432)
22. Leat SJ, Fryer A, Rumney NJ. Outcome of low vision aid provision: the effectiveness of a low vision clinic. Optom Vis Sci 1994;71:199-206. (Pubitemid 24092362)
23. Lowe JB, Rubinstein MP. Distance telescopes: a survey of user success. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:260-269 (Pubitemid 30337693)
24. Verezen CA, Meulendijks CF, Hoyng CB, Klevering BJ. Long-term evaluation of eccentric viewing spectacles in patients with bilateral central scotomas. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:88-95.
25. Zhu SH, Anderson CM, Tedeschi GJ, Rosbrook B, Johnson CE, Byrd M, Gutierrez-Terrell E. Evidence of real-world effectiveness of a telephone quitline for smokers. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1087-1093
26. Hamalainen H, Paalosmaa-Puusa P, Seppanen R, Rastas M, Knuts LR, Voipio-Pulkki LM. Feasibility of, and success in adopting a lowfat diet in coronary patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 2000;32:180-186 (Pubitemid 32015780)
27. Vanier M, Gauthier L, Lambert J, Pepin EP, Robillard A, Dubouloz CJ, Gagnon R, Joannette Y. Evaluation of left visuospatial neglect: norms and discrimination power of two tests. Neurophysiology 1990; 4:87-96.
28. Schenkenberg T, Bradford DC, Ajax ET. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology 1980;30:509-517 (Pubitemid 10112805)
29. Van Deusen J. Normative data for ninety-three elderly persons on the Schenkenberg Line Bisection Test. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 1984; 3:49-54. (Pubitemid 14092306)
30. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive status of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-198
31. Korner-Bitensky NA, Sofer S, Gelinas I, Mazer BL. Evaluating driving potential in persons with stroke: a survey of occupational therapy practices. Am J Occup Ther 1998;52:916-919 (Pubitemid 128452531)
32. Jamara RJ, Van De Velde F, Peli E. Scanning eye movements in homonymous hemianopia documented by scanning laser ophthalmoscope retinal perimetry. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:495-504. (Pubitemid 36870546)
33. Halligan PW, Marshall JC, The history and clinical presentation of neglect. In: Robertson IH, Marshall JC, eds. Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies. Hove, UK: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1993:3-26.
34. Welch RB, Bridgeman B, Anand S, Browman KE. Alternating prism exposure causes dual adaptation and generalization to a novel displacement. Percept Psychophys 1993;54:195-204.
35. Pick HL, Hay JC, Martin R. Adaptation to split-field wedge prism spectacles. J Exp Psychol 1969;80:125-132
36. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1050-1058 (Pubitemid 32652197)
37. Massof RW, Rubin GS. Visual function assessment questionnaires. Surv Ophthalmol 2001;45:531-548
38. Stelmack JA, Stelmack TR, Massof RW. Measuring low-vision rehabilitation outcomes with the NEI VFQ-25. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:2859-2868
39. Turano KA, Geruschat DR, Stahl JW, Massof RW. Perceived visual ability for independent mobility in persons with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:865-877
40. Massof RW. A systems model for low vision rehabilitation. II. Measurement of vision disabilities. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:349-373
41. Bowers AR, Keeney K, Peli E. Community-based trial of a peripheral prism visual field expansion device for hemianopia. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:657-664 (Pubitemid 351679561)