Variance owing to observer, repeat imaging, and fundus camera type on cup-to-disc ratio estimates by stereo planimetry

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 305-310

  Kwon, Young H ^a   Adix, Michael ^a   Zimmerman, M Bridget ^b   Piette, Scott ^a   Greenlee, Emily C ^a,c   Alward, Wallace L M ^a   Abràmoff, Michael D ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Automatic segmentation of stereo fundus photographs; CAP; Computer assisted planimetry; Cup to disc ratio; DAP; Digital automated planimetry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED PLANIMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL AUTOMATED PLANIMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINEAR CUP TO DISC RATIO; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; OBSERVER VARIATION; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC DISK CUP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; FUNDUS OCULI; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 67651146471     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318181545e     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Kwon YH, Kim YI, Pereira ML, et al. Rate of optic disc cup progression in treated primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2003;12:409-416.
2. Abrà moff MD, Alward WL, Greenlee EC, et al. Automated segmentation of the optic nerve head from stereo color photographs using physiologically plausible feature detectors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1665-1673.
3. Varma R, Steinmann WC, Scott IU. Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1992; 99:215-221.
4. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:350-356. (Pubitemid 18075767)
5. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Wollstein G, et al. Interand intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg retina tomograph and computer assisted planimetry. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:664-669. (Pubitemid 29261653)
6. Shuttleworth GN, Khong CH, Diamond JP. A new digital optic disc stereo camera: intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of optic disc measurements. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:403-407.
7. Boes DA, Spaeth GL, Mills RP, et al. Relative optic cup depth assessments using three stereo photograph viewing methods. J Glaucoma. 1996;5:9-14.
8. Rosenthal AR, Kottler MS, Donaldson DD, et al. Comparative reproducibility of the digital photogrammetric procedure utilizing three methods of stereophotography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1977;16:54-60.
9. Krohn MA, Keltner JL, Johnson CA. Comparison of photographic techniques and films used in stereophotogrammetry of the optic disk. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979;88:859-863.
10. Abrà moff MD, Niemeijer M, Suttorp-Schulten MS, et al. Evaluation of a system for automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy from color fundus photographs in a large population of patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008;31: 193-198.
11. Chrastek R, Wolf M, Donath K, et al. Automated segmentation of the optic nerve head for diagnosis of glaucoma. Med Image Anal. 2005;9:297-314. (Pubitemid 40812565)
12. Qian N, Zhu Y. Physiological computation of binocular disparity. Vision Res. 1997;37:1811-1827.
13. Leon Ortega JE, Sakata LM, Kakati B, et al. Effect of glaucomatous damage on repeatability of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, scanning laser polarimetry, and optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48: 1156-1163. (Pubitemid 351261410)