Dual-source CT in heart transplant recipients: Quantification of global left ventricular function and mass

Journal of Thoracic Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 103-109

  Bastarrika, Gorka ^a   Arraiza, Maria ^a   De Cecco, Carlo Nicola ^b   Broncano, Jordi ^a   Mastrobuoni, Stefano ^a   Ubilla, Matias ^a   Pueyo, Jesus C ^a   Rábago, Gregorio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Heart function; Heart transplantation

Indexed keywords

IOMEPROL;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DUAL SOURCE COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART TRANSPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE;

ADULT; AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART TRANSPLANTATION; HUMANS; IOPAMIDOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; STROKE VOLUME; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 67651121620     PISSN: 08835993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e318190426d     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Globits S, De Marco T, Schwitter J, et al. Assessment of early left ventricular remodeling in orthotopic heart transplant recipients with cine magnetic resonance imaging: potential mechanisms. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997;16:504-510. (Pubitemid 27287780)
2. Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB, et al. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): consensus panel report. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:1940-1965. (Pubitemid 39452612)
3. Sandstede J, Lipke C, Beer M, et al. Age- and gender-specific differences in left and right ventricular cardiac function and mass determined by cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:438-442. (Pubitemid 30145755)
4. Natori S, Lai S, Finn JP, et al. Cardiovascular function in multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: normal values by age, sex, and ethnicity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(suppl 2): S357-S365. (Pubitemid 46105405)
5. Myerson SG, Bellenger NG, Pennell DJ. Assessment of left ventricular mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Hypertension. 2002;39:750-755. (Pubitemid 34252869)
6. Bellenger NG, Marcus NJ, Davies C, et al. Left ventricular function and mass after orthotopic heart transplantation: a comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with echocardiography. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2000;19:444-452. (Pubitemid 30249082)
7. Kronik G, Slany J, Mosslacher H. Comparative value of eight M-mode echocardiographic formulas for determining left ventricular stroke volume. A correlative study with thermodilution and left ventricular single-plane cineangiography. Circulation. 1979;60:1308-1316. (Pubitemid 10215876)
8. Allison JD, Flickinger FW, Wright JC, et al. Measurement of left ventricular mass in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using MRI: comparison with echocardiography. Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;11:329-334. (Pubitemid 23150520)
9. Sigurdsson G, Carrascosa P, Yamani MH, et al. Detection of transplant coronary artery disease using multidetector computed tomography with adaptative multisegment reconstruction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:772-778. (Pubitemid 44202580)
10. Romeo G, Houyel L, Angel CY, et al. Coronary stenosis detection by 16-slice computed tomography in heart transplant patients: comparison with conventional angiography and impact on clinical management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45: 1826-1831. (Pubitemid 40779864)
11. Ferencik M, Gregory SA, Butler J, et al. Analysis of cardiac dimensions, mass and function in heart transplant recipients using 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007;26:478-484. (Pubitemid 46602013)
12. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, et al. Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2006;16: 1409-1415. (Pubitemid 43871811)
13. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:2739-2747. (Pubitemid 44823927)
14. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography - initial experience. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57:331-335. (Pubitemid 43254911)
15. Busch S, Johnson TR, Wintersperger BJ, et al. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with dual-source CT in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial findings. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:570-575. (Pubitemid 351248185)
16. Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Koos R, et al. Automated vs. manual assessment of left ventricular function in cardiac multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1416-1423. (Pubitemid 43871812)
17. Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, et al. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2004;230: 403-410. (Pubitemid 38133798)
18. Muhlenbruch G, Das M, Hohl C, et al. Global left ventricular function in cardiac CT. Evaluation of an automated 3D region-growing segmentation algorithm. Eur Radiol. 2006;16: 1117-1123.
19. Flohr TG, Stierstorfer K, Ulzheimer S, et al. Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot. Med Phys. 2005;32:2536-2547. (Pubitemid 41197191)
20. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:256-268. (Pubitemid 43149624)
21. Gregory SA, Ferencik M, Achenbach S, et al. Comparison of sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography to coronary angiography with intravascular ultrasound for the detection of transplant vasculopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:877-884. (Pubitemid 44402254)
22. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
23. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45:255-268.
24. Schlosser T, Pagonidis K, Herborn CU, et al. Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:765-773. (Pubitemid 43899499)
25. Trabold T, Buchgeister M, Kuttner A, et al. Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating. Rofo. 2003;175:1051-1055. (Pubitemid 37059266)
26. Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kanao S, et al. Coronary angiography by 64-detector row computed tomography using low dose of contrast material with saline chaser: influence of total injection volume on vessel attenuation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:272-280. (Pubitemid 46573368)
27. Cademartiri F, Mollet N, van der Lugt A, et al. Non-invasive 16-row multislice CT coronary angiography: usefulness of saline chaser. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:178-183. (Pubitemid 38181073)
28. Gorcsan J III, Snow FR, Paulsen W, et al. Echocardiographic profile of the transplanted human heart in clinically well recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1992;11(Pt 1):80-89.
29. Puesken M, Fischbach R, Wenker M, et al. Global leftventricular function assessment using dual-source multidetector CT: effect of improved temporal resolution on ventricular volume measurement. Eur Radiol. 2008;1:1.