Embodiment and prosthetics

Psychoprosthetics

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 119-129

  Murray, Craig D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67651118209     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84628-980-4_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Cutson TM, Bongiorni DR. Rehabilitation of the older lower limb amputee: a brief review. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996;44(11):1388-1393.
2. Heidegger M. Being and Time. New York: Harper and Row, 1962. [Translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson].
3. Ihde D. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington, In: Indiana University, 1990.
4. Merleau-Ponty M. The Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970. [Translated by C. Smith].
5. Schilder P. The Image and Appearance of the Human Body. New York: International Press, 1935/1950.
6. Leder D. The Absent Body. London: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
7. Kujundzic N, Buschert W. Instruments and the Body: Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. Res Phenomenol 1994;24:206-215.
8. Scarry E. The merging of bodies and artifacts in the social contract. In: Bender G, Druckery T, eds. Culture on the Brink: Ideologies of Technology. Seattle: Bay Press, 1994:85-97.
9. Fraser C. Does an artificial limb become part of the user? Br J Occup Ther 1984;47(2):43-45.
10. McDonnell PM. Developmental response to limb deficiency and limb replacement. Can J Psychol 1988;42(2):120-143.
11. McDonnell PM, Scott R, Dickerson J, Theriault R, Wood B. Do artificial limbs become part of the user? New evidence. J Rehabil Res Dev 1989;26(2):17-24.
12. Murray CD. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26(16):963-973.
13. Churcher J. Implications and applications of Piaget's sensorimotor concepts. In: Selfridge OG, Rissland EL, Arbib MA, eds. Adaptive Control of Ill-Defined Systems. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1984:289-304.
14. Waters R, Perry J, Antonelli D, Hislop H. Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. J Bone Joint Surg 1976;58A(pt 1):42-46.
15. Millstein SG, Heger H, Hunter GA. Prosthetic use in adult and upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1986;10:27-34.
16. Murray CD. The social meanings of prosthesis use. J Health Psychol 2005;10(3):425-441.
17. Dise-Lewis JE. Psychological adaptation to limb loss. In: Atkins DJ, Meyer RH, eds. Comprehensive Management of the Upper-Limb Amputee. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989:165-172.
18. Synnott A. The Body Social: Symbolism, Self and Society. London: Routledge, 1993.
19. Kashani JH, Frank RG, Kashani SR, Wonderlich SA. Depression among amputees. J Clin Psychiatry 1983;44:256-258.
20. Bradway JK, Malone JM, Racy J, Leal JM, Pool J. Psychological adaptation to amputation: an overview. Orthot Prosthet 1984;38(3):46-50.
21. Rybarczyk BD, Nyenhuis DL, Nicholas JJ, Schulz R, Alioto RJ, Blair C. Social discomfort and depression in a sample of adults with leg amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73(12):1169-1173.
22. Dunn DS. Well-being following amputation: salutary effects of positive meaning, optimism and control. Rehabil Psychol 1996;41(4):285.
23. Murray CD. Technologising the body: embodiment and phenomenologies of prosthesis use. Unpublished PhD thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, 2003.
24. Murray CD, Sixsmith J. The corporeal body in virtual reality. Ethos 1999;27(3):315-343.
25. Young I. Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1990.
26. Kaiser SB, Freeman CM, Wingate SB. Stigmata and negotiated outcomes: management of appearance by persons with physical disabilities. Deviant Behav 1985;6(2):205-224.
27. Kaiser SB, Wingate SB, Freeman CM, Chandler JL. Acceptance of physical disability and attitudes toward personal appearance. Rehabil Psychol 1987;32(1):51-58.
28. Kurzman SL. Cultural attitudes towards prostheses: an anthropological approach. Capabilities: Communicating the Science of Prosthetics and Orthotics 1997;6(4):3-5, 8.
29. Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
30. French L. The political economy of injury and compassion: Amputees on the Thai-Cambodia border. In: Csordas TJ, ed. Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994:69-99.
31. Herschbach L. Prosthetic reconstructions: making the industry, re-making the body, modelling the nation. History Workshop J 1997;44:23-57.
32. Frank G. Life history model of adaptation to disability: the case of a "congenital amputee." Soc Sci Med 1984;19(6):639-645.
33. Frank G. On embodiment: a case of congenital limb deficiency in American culture. Culture Med Psychiatry 1986;10:189-219.
34. Frank G. Beyond stigma: visibility and self-empowerment of persons with congenital limb deficiencies. J Social Issues 1988;44(1):95-115.
35. Feinglass J, Rucker-Whitaker C, Lindquist L, McCarthy WJ, Pearce WH. Racial differences in primary and repeat lower extremity amputation: results from a multihospital study. J Vasc Surg 2005;41(5):823-829.
36. Young BA, Maynard C, Reiber G, Boyko EG. Effects of ethnicity and nephropathy on lowerextremity amputation risk among diabetic veterans. Diabetes Care 2003;26(2):495-501.
37. Dolezal JM, Vernick SH, Khan N, Lutz D, Tyndall C. Factors associated with use and nonuse of an AK prosthesis in a rural, southern, geriatric population. Int J Rehabil Health 1998;4(4):245-251.
38. Vernon A. The dialectics of multiple identities and the disabled people's movement. Disabil Soc 1999;14(3):385-398. 39.
39. Brough G, Miller I. Black amputee told: we only do feet in pink. Daily Mirror August 25, 2003