Nestling begging increases predation risk, regardless of spectral characteristics or avian mobbing

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 821-829

  McDonald, Paul G ^a   Wilson, David R ^a   Evans, Christopher S ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Costs of signals; Parent offspring conflict; Predator prey interactions; Signal design

Indexed keywords

BEGGING BEHAVIOR; MOBBING; NEST PREDATION; NESTLING; PARENT-OFFSPRING INTERACTION; PARENTAL CARE; PASSERINE; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

AVES; MANORINA MELANOPHRYS; RODENTIA;

EID: 67651111902     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arp066     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bell MB. 2008. Strategic adjustment of begging effort by banded mongoose pups. Proc R Soc Lond B. 275:1313-1319.
2. Beruldsen G. 1980. A field guide to nests and eggs of Australian birds. Adelaide (Australia): Rigby Publishers Limited.
3. Brilot BO, Johnstone RA. 2003. The limits to cost-free signalling of need between relatives. Proc R Soc Lond B. 270:1055-1060.
4. Briskie JV, Martin PR, Martin TE. 1999. Nest predation and the evolution of nestling begging calls. Proc R Soc Lond B. 266:2153-2159.
5. Briskie JV, Naugler CG, Leech SM. 1994. Begging intensity of nestling birds varies with sibling relatedness. Proc R Soc Lond B. 258:73-78.
6. Budden AE, Wright J. 2001. Falling on deaf ears: the adaptive significance of begging in the absence of a parent. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 49:474-481.
7. Bulmer E, Celis P, Gil D. 2008. Parent-absent begging: evidence for sibling honesty and cooperation in the spotless starling (Sturnus unicolor). Behav Ecol. 19:279-284.
8. Chappell MA, Bachman GC. 2002. Energetic costs of begging behaviour. In: Wright J, Leonard ML, editors. The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and conflict. Dordrecht (the Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 143-162.
9. Clarke MF, Fitz-Gerald GF. 1994. Spatial organisation of the cooperatively breeding bell miner Manorina melanophrys. Emu. 94:96-105.
10. Cotton PA, Kacelnik A, Wright J. 1996. Chick begging as a signal: are nestlings honest? Behav Ecol. 7:178-182.
11. Davies NB, Madden JR, Butchart SHM. 2004. Learning fine-tunes a specific response of nestlings to the parental alarm calls of their own species. Proc R Soc Lond B. 271:2297-2304.
12. Dearborn DC. 1999. Brown-headed cowbird nestling vocalizations and risk of nest predation. Auk. 116:448-457.
13. Eggers S, Griesser M, Ekman J. 2008. Predator-induced reductions in nest visitation rates are modified by forest cover and food availability. Behav Ecol. 19:1056-1062.
14. Furlow FB. 1997. Human neonatal cry quality as an honest signal of fitness. Evol Human Behav. 18:175-193.
15. Gaunt AS, Nowicki S. 1998. Sound production in birds: acoustics and physiology revisited. In: Hopp SL, Owren MJ, Evans CS, editors. Animal acoustic communication: sound analysis and research methods. Berlin: Springer. p. 291-322.
16. Godfray HCJ. 1991. Signalling of need by offspring to their parents. Nature. 352:328-330.
17. Haskell DG. 1994. Experimental evidence that nestling begging behavior incurs a cost due to nest predation. Proc R Soc Lond B. 257: 161-164.
18. Haskell DG. 1999. The effect of predation on begging-call evolution in nestling wood warblers. Anim Behav. 57:893-901.
19. Haskell DG. 2002. Begging behaviour and nest predation. In: Wright J, Leonard ML, editors. The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and conflict. Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 163-172.
20. Hatchwell BJ. 1999. Investment strategies of breeders in avian cooperative breeding systems. Am Nat. 154:205-219.
21. Heinsohn RG, Legge S. 1999. The cost of helping. TREE. 14:53-57.
22. Hertz-Picciotto I, Rockhill B. 1997. Validity and efficiency of approximation methods for tied survival times in Cox regression. Biometrics. 53:1151-1156.
23. Higgins PJ, Peter JM, Steele WK. 2001. Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds. Vol. 5: Tyrant-flycatchers to chats. Melbourne (Australia): Oxford University Press.
24. Johnstone RA, Godfray HCJ. 2002. Models of begging as a signal of need. In: Wright J, Leonard ML, editors. The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and conflict. Dordrect (the Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 1-20.
25. Kilner RM. 2001. A growth cost of begging in captive canary chicks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 98:11394-11398.
26. Kilner RM, Johnstone RA. 1997. Begging the question: are offspring solicitation behaviours signals of need? TREE. 12:11-15.
27. Krams I, Krama T, Igaune K, Mand R. 2007. Long-lasting mobbing of the pied flycatcher increases the risk of nest predation. Behav Ecol. 18:1082-1084.
28. Kruuk H. 1964. Predators and anti-predator behaviour of the blackheaded gull (Larus ridibundus L.). Behav Supp. 11:1-129.
29. Leech SM, Leonard ML. 1997. Begging and the risk of predation in nestling birds. Behav Ecol. 8:644-646.
30. Leonard ML, Horn AG. 2006. Age-related changes in signalling of need by nestling tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Ethol. 112: 1020-1026.
31. Leonard ML, Horn AG. 2008. Does ambient noise affect growth and begging call structure in nestling birds? Behav Ecol. 19:502-507.
32. Loyn RH, Runnalls RG, Forward GY. 1983. Territorial bell miners and other birds affecting populations of insect prey. Science. 221: 1411-1413.
33. Madden JR, Kilner RM, Davies NB. 2005. Nestling responses to adult food and alarm calls 2: Cowbirds and red-winged blackbirds reared by eastern phoebe hosts. Anim Behav. 70:629-637.
34. Major RE, Kendal CE. 1996. The contribution of artificial nest experiments to understanding avian reproductive success: a review of methods and conclusions. Ibis. 138:298-307.
35. Marler P. 1955. Characteristics of some animal calls. Nature. 176:6-8.
36. Martin TE, Scott J, Menge C. 2000. Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects. Proc R Soc Lond B. 267:2287-2293.
37. McDonald PG, Heathcote CF, Clarke MF, Wright J, Kazem AJN. 2007. Provisioning calls of the cooperatively breeding bell miner Manorina melanophrys encode sufficient information for individual discrimination. J Avian Biol. 38:113-121.
38. McDonald PG, Kazem AJN, Clarke MF, Wright J. 2008. Helping as a signal: does removal of potential audiences alter helper behavior in the bell miner? Behav Ecol. 19:1047-1055.
39. McDonald PG, Kazem AJN, Wright J. 2007. A critical analysis of 'falsefeeding' behaviour in a cooperatively breeding bird: disturbance effects, satiated nestlings or deception? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 61: 1623-1635.
40. McDonald PG, Kazem AJN, Wright J. 2009. Cooperative provisioning dynamics: fathers and unrelated helpers show similar responses to manipulations of begging. Anim Behav. 77:369-376.
41. McDonald PG, te Marvelde L, Kazem AJN, Wright J. 2008. Helping as a signal and the effect of a potential audience during provisioning visits in a cooperative bird. Anim Behav. 75:1319-1330.
42. McDonald PG, Wright J. 2008. Provisioning vocalizations in cooperative bell miners: more than a simple stimulus for nestling begging? Auk. 125:670-678.
43. McEntee D. 2007. Use of artificial nests to monitor predators in braided river systems (Masters). Christchurch: Lincoln University. Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ. 1988. Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q Rev Biol. 63:167-187.
44. Platzen D, Magrath RD. 2004. Parental alarm calls suppress nestling vocalization. Proc R Soc Lond B. 271:1271-1276.
45. Poiani A. 1993. Reproductive biology of the Bell Miner (Manorina melanophrys, Meliphagidae) at Healesville, South-eastern Victoria. Wild Res. 20:579-598.
46. Rauter CM, Moore AJ. 1999. Do honest signalling models of offspring solicitation apply to insects? Proc R Soc Lond B. 266:1691-1696.
47. Redondo T, Arias de Reyna L. 1988. Locatability of begging calls in nestling altricial birds. Anim Behav. 36:653-661.
48. Rodríguez-Gironés MA, Zúñiga JM, Redondo T. 2001. Effects of begging on growth rates of nestling chicks. Behav Ecol. 12:269-274.
49. te Marvelde L, McDonald PG, Kazem AJN, Wright J. 2009. Do helpers really help? Provisioning biomass and prey type effects on nestling growth in the cooperative bell miner. Anim Behav. 77:727-735.
50. Thompson FR III, Burhans DE. 2004. Differences in predators of artificial and real songbird nests: evidence of bias in artificial nest studies. Cons Biol. 18:373-380.
51. Wiklund CG, Andersson M. 1994. Natural selection of colony size in a passerine bird. J Anim Ecol. 63:765-774.
52. Wiley RH, Richards DG. 1982. Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, Ouellet H, editors. Acoustic communication in birds Vol. 1:Production, perception, and design features of sounds. New York: Academic Press. p. 131-181.
53. Wood SR, Sanderson KJ, Evans CS. 2000. Perception of terrestrial and aerial alarm calls by honeyeaters and falcons. Aust J Zool. 48:127-134.
54. Wright J. 1998. Helpers-at-the-nest have the same provisioning rule as parents: experimental evidence from play-backs of chick begging. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 42:423-429.
55. Wright J, Dingemanse NJ. 1999. Parents and helpers compensate for experimental changes in the provisioning effort of others in the Arabian babbler. Anim Behav. 58:345-350.
56. Wright J, Leonard ML, editors. 2002. The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Dordrecht (the Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Press.
57. Wright J, McDonald PG, te Marvelde L, Kazem AJN. (Forthcoming). Direct versus indirect fitness benefits: male and female helpers respond to begging for different reasons.
58. Zahavi A. 1977. Reliability in communication systems and the evolution of altruism. In: Stonehouse B, Perrins C, editors. Evolutionary ecology. London: Macmillan Press. p. 253-259.