The effect of performance feedback and client importance on auditors' self- and public-focused ethical judgments

Managerial Auditing Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 455-474

  Cianci, Anna M ^a   Bierstaker, James Lloyd ^b  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditors; Ethics; Feedback; Performance appraisal

Indexed keywords

EID: 67651091618     PISSN: 02686902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02686900910956810     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Abdolmohammadi, M.J., Read, W.J. and Scarbrough, D.P. (2003), Does selection socialization help to explain accountants' weak ethical reasoning?, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 71-81.
2. Accounting Office Management and Administrative Report (2006), How performance management can build productivity, retain staff and save money, Accounting Office Management and Administrative Report, Vol. 6, pp. 1-6.
3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (2000), Code of Professional Conduct, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York, NY.
4. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (2004), Code of Professional Conduct, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York, NY.
5. Anderson, T.N. Jr and Koonce, L. (1995), Explanation as a method for evaluating client-suggested causes in analytical procedures, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 14, pp. 124-32.
6. Asare, S., Cohen, J. and Trompeter, G. (2005), The effect of non-audit services on client risk, acceptance and staffing decisions, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 489-520.
7. Ashton, A.H. and Ashton, R.H. (1988), Sequential belief revision in auditing, The Accounting Review, Vol. 63 No. 4, pp. 623-41.
8. Ashton, R.H. and Ashton, A.H. (1990), Evidence-responsiveness in professional judgment: effects of positive versus negative evidence and presentation mode, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 1-19.
9. Bazerman, M.H., Loewenstein, G. and Moore, D.A. (2002), Why good accountants do bad audits, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80 No. 11, pp. 96-103.
10. Beasley, M., Clune, R. and Hermanson, D.R. (2005), Enterprise risk management: an empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 24, pp. 521-31.
11. Bernardi, R.A. and Arnold, D.F. Sr (2004), Testing the 'inverted-U' phenomenon in moral development on recently promoted senior managers and partners, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 353-67.
12. Bierstaker, J. and Wright, A. (2001), The effects of fee pressure and partner pressure on audit planning decisions, Advances in Accounting, Vol. 18, pp. 25-46.
13. Bird, E. and Gandz, J. (1991), Good Management: Business Ethics in Action, Prentice-Hall, Scarborough.
14. Bonner, S. (2007), Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting, Pearson/Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
15. Braun, K.W. (2001), The disposition of audit detected misstatements: an examination of risk and reward factors and aggregation effects, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 18, pp. 71-99.
16. Braun, R. (2000), The effect of time pressure on auditor attention to qualitative aspects of misstatements indicative of potential fraudulent financial reporting, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 243-59.
17. Brown, D.S. and Porter, T. (2006), Enhance individual, team and firm performance by creating a feedback culture, CPA Practice Management Forum, Vol. 2, pp. 14-15.
18. Buckless, F.A. and Ravenscroft, S.P. (1990), Constrast coding: a refinement of ANOVA in behavioral analysis, The Accounting Review, Vol. 65, pp. 933-45.
19. Bu-Peow Ng, T. (2007), Auditors' decisions on audit differences that affect significant earnings thresholds, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, May, pp. 71-90.
20. Byrnes, N., McNamee, M., Brady, D. and Lavelle, L. (2002), Accounting in crisis: reform is urgent. Here's what needs to be done, BusinessWeek, January 28, pp. 44-8.
21. Caldwell, C. and Karri, R. (2005), Organizational governance and ethical systems: a covenantal approach to building trust, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 58 Nos 1/3, pp. 249-59.
22. Caplan, D.H. and Kirschenheiter, M. (2000), Outsourcing and audit risk for internal audit services, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 387-428.
23. Chia, A. and Mee, L.S. (2000), The effects of issue characteristics on the recognition of moral issues, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 27, pp. 255-69.
24. Chung, H. and Kallapur, S. (2003), Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals, The Accounting Review, Vol. 78 No. 4, pp. 931-55.
25. Cohen, J.R. and Bennie, N.M. (2006), The applicability of a contingent factors model to accounting ethics research, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 68, pp. 1-18.
26. Cohen, J.R. and Trompeter, G.M. (1998), An examination of factors affecting audit practice, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 15, pp. 481-504.
27. Coram, P., Ng, J. and Woodliff, D. (2004), The effects of risk of misstatement on the propensity to commit reduced audit quality acts, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 23, pp. 159-67.
28. Covaleski, M.A., Dirsmith, M.W., Heian, J.B. and Samuel, S. (1998), The calculated and the avowed: techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six accounting firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 43, pp. 293-327.
29. DeAngelo, L. (1981), Auditor size and audit quality, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 183-99.
30. DeZoort, F.T. and Lord, A.T. (1997), A review and synthesis of pressure effects research in accounting, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 16, pp. 28-85.
31. DeZoort, T., Harrison, P. and Taylor, M. (2006), Accountability and auditors materiality judgments: the effects of differential pressure strength on conservatism, variability, and effort, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 31 Nos 4/5, pp. 373-90.
32. Dirsmith, M.W. and Covaleski, M.A. (1985), Informal communications, nonformal communications and mentoring in public accounting firms, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 19, pp. 149-70.
33. Emby, C. and Etherington, L.D. (1996), Performance evaluation of auditors: role perceptions of superior and subordinates, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 15, pp. 99-109.
34. Flory, S.M., Phillips, T.J., Reidenbach, R.E. and Robin, D.P. (1992), A multidimensional analysis of selected ethical issues in accounting, The Accounting Review, Vol. 67 No. 2, pp. 284-303.
35. Geva, A. (2006), A typology of moral problems in business: a framework for ethical management, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 69 No. 2, pp. 133-47.
36. Gregson, T. (1990), Communication satisfaction: a path analytic study of accountants affiliated with CPA firms, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 2, pp. 32-49.
37. Hackenbrack, K. and Nelson, M. (1996), Auditors' incentives and their application of financial accounting standards, Accounting Review, Vol. 71, pp. 43-59.
38. Hooks, K., Cheramy, S.J. and Terry, L.S. (1994), Methods used by Big 6 partners in practice development, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 13, pp. 101-14.
39. Houston, R.W. (1999), The effects of fee pressure and client risk on audit seniors' time budget decisions, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 18, pp. 70-86.
40. Hunt, A.K. and Lulseged, A. (2007), Client importance and non-Big 5 auditors' reporting decisions, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 212-48.
41. Imhoff, E.A. (2003), Accounting quality, auditing, and corporate governance, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 17, pp. 117-28.
42. Johnstone, K.M. (2000), Client-acceptance decisions: simultaneous effects of client business risk, audit risk, auditor business risk, and risk adaptation, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 19, pp. 1-26.
43. Johnstone, K.M., Bedard, J.C. and Biggs, S.F. (2002), Aggressive client reporting: factors affecting auditors' generation of financial reporting alternatives, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 47-65.
44. Jones, J., Massey, D. and Thorne, L. (2003), Auditors' ethical reasoning: insights from past research and implications for the future, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 22, pp. 45-104.
45. Jones, T.M. (1991), Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue - contingent model, Academy of Management, Vol. 16, pp. 366-95.
46. Kadous, K., Kennedy, S.J. and Peecher, M.E. (2003), The effect of quality assessment and directional goal commitment on auditors' acceptance of client-preferred accounting methods, The Accounting Review, Vol. 3, pp. 759-78.
47. Kaplan, S.E. and Whitecotton, S.M. (2001), An examination of auditors' reporting intentions when another auditor is offered client employment, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 45-63.
48. Kelly, T. and Margheim, L. (1990), The impact of time budget pressure, personality, and leadership variables on dysfunctional auditor behavior, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 9, pp. 21-42.
49. Kluger, A.N. and DeNisi, A. (1996), Effects of feedback intervention on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 119, pp. 254-84.
50. Lemon, W.M. and Wallace, W.A. (2000), Ethical issues facing internal auditors and their profession, Research on Accounting Ethics, Vol. 6, pp. 189-203.
51. Libby, R. and Kinney, W.R. (2000), Does mandated audit communication reduce opportunistic corrections to manage earnings to forecasts?, The Accounting Review, Vol. 75 No. 4, pp. 383-404.
52. Lord, A.T. and DeZoort, F.T. (2001), The impact of commitment and moral reasoning on auditors' responses to social influence pressure, Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 26, pp. 215-35.
53. McCarthy, E. (2004), Tips for the Sarbanes-Oxley learning curve, Journal of Accountancy, June, pp. 36-44.
54. McDaniel, L.S. (1990), The effects of time pressure and audit program structure on audit performance, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 28, pp. 267-85.
55. McMahon, J.M. and Harvey, R.J. (2007), The effect of moral intensity on ethical judgment, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 72, pp. 335-57.
56. Margheim, L. and Kelley, T. (1992), The perceived effects of fixed fee audit billing arrangements, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 6, pp. 62-75.
57. Massey, D.W. and Thorne, L. (2006), The impact of task information feedback on ethical reasoning, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 18, pp. 103-17.
58. Moore, D.A., Tetlock, P.E., Tanlu, L. and Bazerman, M.H. (2006), Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: moral seduction and strategic issue cycling, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, pp. 10-29.
59. Moreno, K. and Bhattacharjee, S. (2003), The impact of pressure from potential client business opportunities on the judgments of auditors across professional ranks, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 22, pp. 13-28.
60. Nelson, M., Elliott, J. and Tarpley, R. (2002), Evidence from auditors about managers' and auditors' earnings management decisions, The Accounting Review, Vol. 77, pp. 175-203.
61. Nelson, M.W. and Kinney, W.R. (1997), The effect of ambiguity on loss contingency reporting judgments, The Accounting Review, Vol. 72, pp. 257-74.
62. Paolillo, J.G.P. and Vitell, S. (2002), An empirical investigation of the influence of selected personal, organizational and moral intensity factors on ethical decision making, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 35, pp. 65-75.
63. Patten, D. (1995), Supervisory actions and job satisfaction: an analysis of differences between large and small public accounting firms, Accounting Horizons, June, pp. 17-28.
64. Ponemon, L.A. (1992), Auditor underreporting of time and moral reasoning: an experimental lab study, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 9, pp. 171-89.
65. Raghunandan, K., Read, W.J. and Rama, D.V. (2001), Audit committee characteristics 'gray'directors, and interaction with internal auditing, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 15, pp. 105-18.
66. Rich, J.S., Solomon, I. and Trotman, K.T. (1997a), Multi-auditor judgment/decision making research: a decade later, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 16, pp. 86-126.
67. Rich, J.S., Solomon, I. and Trotman, K.T. (1997b), The audit review process: a characterization from the persuasion perspective, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 22, pp. 481-505.
68. Salterio, S. and Koonce, L. (1997), The persuasiveness of audit evidence: the case of accounting policy decisions, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 22, pp. 573-87.
69. Scandura, T.E. and Viator, R.E. (1994), Mentoring in public accounting firms: an analysis of mentor-protégé relationships, mentorship functions, and protégé turnover intentions, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 19, pp. 717-34.
70. Scarbrough, P., Rama, D.V. and Raghunandan, K. (1998), Audit committees' interaction with internal auditing: Canadian evidence, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 12, pp. 51-62.
71. Schultz, J.J. Jr, Johnson, D.A., Morris, D. and Dyrnes, S. (1993), An investigation of the reporting of questionable acts in an international setting, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 31, pp. 75-103.
72. Shafer, W.E., Morris, R.E. and Ketchand, A.A. (1999), The effects of formal sanctions on auditor independence, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 18, pp. 113-5.
73. Shafer, W.E., Morris, R.E. and Ketchand, A.A. (2001), Effects of personal values on auditors' ethical decisions, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 14 No. 21, pp. 254-77.
74. Shah, A. (1996), Creative compliance in financial reporting, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21, pp. 23-41.
75. Singer, M.S. (1996), The role of moral intensity and fairness perception in judgments of ethicality: a comparison of managerial professionals and the general public, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 469-74.
76. Singer, M.S. and Singer, A.E. (1997), Observer judgments about moral agents, ethical decisions: the role of scope of justice and moral intensity, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 473-84.
77. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S.J. and Franke, G.R. (1999), Antecedents, consequences, and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 19-36.
78. SOX (2002), Public Law No. 107-204, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
79. Thorne, L. (2000), The development of two measures to assess accountants' prescriptive and deliberative moral reasoning, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 12, pp. 139-70.
80. Trompeter, G. (1994), The effect of partner compensation schemes and generally accepted accounting principles on audit partner judgment, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 13, pp. 56-68.
81. Vera-Munoz, S.C., Ho, J.L. and Chow, C.W. (2006), Enhancing knowledge sharing in public accounting firms, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 22, pp. 133-56.
82. Waters, J.A., Bird, F. and Chant, P.D. (1986), Everyday moral issues experienced by managers, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 5, pp. 373-85.
83. Wright, A. and Wright, S. (1997), An examination of factors affecting the decision to waive audit adjustments, Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, Vol. 12, pp. 15-36.