Event-related potentials for interaural time differences and spectral cues

NeuroReport

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 951-956

  Hautus, Michael J ^a   Johnson, Blake W ^b   Colling, Lincoln J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Auditory segregation; Auditory evoked potential; Dichotic pitch; Interaural time difference

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DICHOTIC LISTENING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MONAURAL HEARING; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIME PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PITCH PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; SOUND LOCALIZATION; TIME FACTORS; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67651089613     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832c92bf     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Alain C, Arnott SR, Picton TW. Bottom-up and top-down influences on auditory scene analysis: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2001; 27:1072-1089. (Pubitemid 33596610)
2. Alain C, Schuler BM, McDonald KL. Neural activity associated with distinguishing concurrent auditory objects. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111:990-995. (Pubitemid 34127479)
3. Alain C. Breaking the wave: effects of attention and learning on concurrent sound perception. Hear Res 2007; 229:225-236. (Pubitemid 46920881)
4. Clapp WC, Johnson BW, Hautus MJ. Graded cue information in dichotic pitch: effects on event-related potentials. Neuroreport 2007; 18:365-368.
5. Hautus MJ, Johnson BW. Object-related brain potentials associated with the perceptual segregation of a dichotically embedded pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117:275-280.
6. Johnson BW, Hautus M, Clapp WC. Neural activity associated with binaural processes for the perceptual segregation of pitch. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114:2245-2250. (Pubitemid 37494922)
7. Johnson BW, Hautus MJ, Duff DJ, Clapp WC. Sequential processing of interaural timing differences for sound source segregation and spatial localization: evidence from event-related cortical potentials. Psychophysiology 2007; 44:541-551.
8. Johnson BW, Hautus MJ, Hayns AL, Fitzgibbon BM. Differential cortical processing of location and pitch changes in dichotic pitch. Neuroreport 2006; 17:389-393.
9. Johnson BW, Muthukumaraswamy SD, Hautus MJ, Gaetz WC, Cheyne DO. Neuromagnetic responses associated with perceptual segregation of pitch. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol [electronic resource]: NCN 2004; 2004:33.
10. Dougherty RF, Cynader MS, Bjornson BH, Edgell D, Giaschi DE. Dichotic pitch: a new stimulus distinguishes normal and dyslexic auditory function. Neuroreport 1998; 9:3001-3005.
11. Ferree TC, Luu P, Russell GS, Tucker DM. Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112:536-544. (Pubitemid 32166936)
12. Jervis BW, Nichols MJ, Allen EM. The assessment of two methods for removing eye movement artefact from the EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 61:444-452.
13. Alarcon G, Guy CN, Binnie CD. A simple algorithm for a digital three-pole Butterworth filter of arbitrary cut-off frequency: application to digital electroencephalography. J Neurosci Methods 2000; 104:35-44. (Pubitemid 32037161)
14. Macmillan NA, Kaplan HL. Detection theory analysis of group data. Estimating sensitivity from average hit and false-alarm rates. Psychol Bull 1985; 98:185-199.
15. Oostenveld R, Praamstra P. The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112:713-719. (Pubitemid 32245646)