Effects of prosodic familiarity on the automatic processing of words in the human brain

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 362-368

  Ylinen, Sari ^a,b   Strelnikov, Kuzma ^a,b,c   Huotilainen, Minna ^a,b   Näätänen, Risto ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b Helsinki Brain Research Center   (Finland)

^c Brain and Cognition Research Center in Toulouse   (France)

Author keywords

Event related potential (ERP); Familiarity; Mismatch negativity (MMN); Speech prosody; Word stress

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MEMORY; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STIMULUS; WORD RECOGNITION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67651067595     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Boersma P., and Weenink D. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (Version 4.2.17) [Computer Program] (2004). http://www.praat.org/ Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
2. Bond Z.S., and Small L.H. Voicing, vowel, and stress mispronunciations in continuous speech. Percept. Psychophys. 34 (1983) 470-474
3. Bonte M.L., Mitterer H., Zellagui N., Poelmans H., and Blomert L. Auditory cortical tuning to statistical regularities in phonology. Clin. Neurophysiol. 116 (2005) 2765-2774
4. Connine C.M., Mullennix J., Shernoff E., and Yelen J. Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 16 (1990) 1084-1096
5. Cutler A., and Clifton C. The use of prosodic information in word recognition. In: Bouma H., and Bouwhuis D.G. (Eds). Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes (1984), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London 183-196
6. Cutler A., Dahan D., and van Donselaar W. Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review. Lang. Speech 40 (1997) 141-201
7. Dehaene-Lambertz G. Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. NeuroReport 8 (1997) 919-924
8. Honbolygó F., Csépe V., and Ragó A. Suprasegmental speech cues are automatically processed by the human brain: a mismatch negativity study. Neurosci. Lett. 363 (2004) 84-88
9. Huotilainen M., Kujala A., and Alku P. Long-term memory traces facilitate short-term memory trace formation in audition in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 310 (2001) 133-136
10. Jacobsen T., Horvath J., Schröger E., Lattner S., Widmann A., and Winkler I. Pre-attentive auditory processing of lexicality. Brain Lang. 88 (2004) 54-67
11. Jusczyk P.W. How infants begin to extract words from speech. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3 (1999) 323-328
12. Kirmse, U., Jacobsen, T., Schröger, E., 2009. Familiarity affects environmental sound processing outside the focus of attention: an event-related potential study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 120, 887-896.
13. Kooijman V., Hagoort P., and Cutler A. Electrophysiological evidence for prelinguistic infants' word recognition in continuous speech. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 24 (2005) 109-116
14. Marslen-Wilson W. Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In: Altmann G.T.M. (Ed). Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 148-172
15. Näätänen R. The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 1-21
16. Näätänen R., Gaillard A.W., and Mäntysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol. 42 (1978) 313-329
17. Näätänen R., Lehtokoski A., Lennes M., Cheour M., Huotilainen M., Iivonen A., Vainio M., Alku P., Ilmoniemi R.J., Luuk A., Allik J., Sinkkonen J., and Alho K. Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature 385 (1997) 432-434
18. Paavilainen P., Arajärvi P., and Takegata R. Preattentive detection of nonsalient contingencies between auditory features. NeuroReport 18 (2007) 159-163
19. Phillips C., Pellathy T., Marantz A., Yellin E., Wexler K., Poeppel D., McGinnis M., and Roberts T. Auditory cortex accesses phonological categories: an MEG mismatch study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12 (2000) 1038-1055
20. Pulvermüller F., and Shtyrov Y. Language outside the focus of attention: the mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes. Prog. Neurobiol. 79 (2006) 49-71
21. Pulvermüller F., Kujala T., Shtyrov Y., Simola J., Tiitinen H., Alku P., Alho K., Martinkauppi S., Ilmoniemi R.J., and Näätänen R. Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity. NeuroImage 14 (2001) 607-616
22. Pulvermüller F., Shtyrov Y., Kujala T., and Näätänen R. Word-specific cortical activity as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 106-112
23. Saarinen J., Paavilainen P., Schröger E., Tervaniemi M., and Näätänen R. Representation of abstract attributes of auditory stimuli in the human brain. NeuroReport 3 (1992) 1149-1151
24. Schröger E. On the detection of auditory deviations: a pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology 34 (1997) 245-257
25. Shestakova A., Brattico E., Huotilainen M., Galunov V., Soloviev A., Sams M., Ilmoniemi R.J., and Näätänen R. Abstract phoneme representations in the left temporal cortex: magnetic mismatch negativity study. NeuroReport 13 (2002) 1813-1816
26. Shtyrov Y., and Pulvermüller F. Neurophysiological evidence of memory traces for words in the human brain. NeuroReport 13 (2002) 521-525
27. Soto-Faraco S., Sebastián-Gallés N., and Cutler A. Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. J. Mem. Lang. 45 (2001) 412-432
28. van Donselaar W., Koster M., and Cutler A. Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 58 (2005) 251-273
29. Weber C., Hahne A., Friedrich M., and Friederici A.D. Discrimination of word stress in early infant perception: electrophysiological evidence. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 18 (2004) 149-161
30. Winkler I., Karmos G., and Näätänen R. Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Brain Res. 742 (1996) 239-252
31. Winkler I., Schröger E., and Cowan N. The role of large-scale memory organization in the mismatch negativity event-related brain potential. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13 (2001) 59-71