Estimating the Incidence of Autism

Epidemiology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 622-623

  Grinker, Roy Richard ^a   Leventhal, Bennett L ^b  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTISM; DATA BASE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGE FACTORS; AUTISTIC DISORDER; CALIFORNIA; EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH DESIGN; HUMANS;

EID: 67651055466     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a822b7     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Hertz-Picciotto I, Delwiche L. The rise of autism and the role of age at diagnosis. Epidemiology. 2009;20:84-90.
2. Croen LA, Grether JK, Hoogstrate J, Selvin S. The changing prevalence of autism in California. J Autism Dev Disord. 2002;32:207-215.
3. State of California Department of Developmental Services. Data Interpretation Considerations and Limitations [DDS web site]. n.d. Available at: http://www.dds.ca.gov/FactsStats/docs/CDER-QtrlyReport-Consideration- Limitations.pdf.
4. State of California Department of Developmental Services. Data Interpretation Considerations and Limitations [DDS web site]. n.d. Available at: http://www.dds.ca.gov/FactsStats/docs/CDER-QtrlyReport-Consideration- Limitations.pdf.
5. Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network. Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders-Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, Fourteen Sites, United States, 2002. MMWR. 2007;56(SS-1):12-29.
6. Bishop DV, Whitehouse AJ, Watt HJ, Line EA. Autism and diagnostic substitution: evidence from a study of adults with a history of developmental language disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:341-345.
7. Boulet SL, Correa-Villaseiior A, Hsia J, Atrash H. Feasability of using the national hospital discharge survey to estimate the prevalence of selected birth defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2006;76(Part A):757-761.
8. Strickland MJ, Riehle-Colarusso TJ, Jacobs JP, et al. The importance of nomenclature for congenital cardiac disease: implications for research and evaluation. Cardiol Young. 2008; 18(suppl 2):92-100.