On the Logistics of Interpretive Radiology Reporting: Moving Beyond Procrustes

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 6, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 544-546

  Brenner, R James ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL IMAGING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RECORD; NOMENCLATURE; STANDARDIZATION;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DOCUMENTATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RADIOLOGY; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 67651024083     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Radiologic Society of North America. RadLex: a lexicon for uniform indexing and retrieval of radiology information resources. http://micr.rsna.org/radlex/service Accessed February 14, 2009.
2. Brenner R.J., and Westenberg L. Film management and custody: current and future medicolegal issues. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167 (1996) 1371-1375
3. Gunderman R.B. Patient communication: what to teach radiology residents. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177 (2001) 41-43
4. Armas R.R. Qualities of a good radiology report. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170 (1998) 1110
5. Brenner R.J., and Bartholomew L. Communication errors in radiology: a liability cost analysis. J Am Coll Radiol 2 (2005) 428-431
6. Thorwarth W.T. Get paid for what you do: dictation patterns and impact on billing accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol 2 (2005) 665-669
7. Mammography Quality Standards Reauthorization Act of 1998, Pub L No 105-248 (1998).
8. Berg W.A., Campassi C., Langenberg P., and Sexton M.J. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 (2000) 1769-1777
9. Geller B.M., Barlow W.E., Ballard-Barbash R., et al. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease. Radiology 222 (2002) 536-542
10. Taplin S.H., Ichikawa L.E., Kelikowske K., et al. Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology 222 (2002) 529-535
11. Kundel H.L., Nodine C.F., Conant E.F., and Weinstein S.P. Holistic component of image perceptionin mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study. Radiology 242 (2007) 396-402
12. Saslow D., Boetes C., Burke W., et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57 (2007) 75-89
13. Skettington v Bradley, 366 Mich 552, 115 NW 2D 303 (1962).
14. Dang P.A., Kaira M.K., Blake M.A., et al. Extraction of recommendation features in radiology with natural language processing: exploratory study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191 (2008) 313-320
15. Phillips v Good Samaritan Hospital, 416 NE 2D 640 (Ohio) (1979).
16. Berk R.N., and Whalen G. Impediments to clarity: an annotated glossary of rhetoricals pratfalls and pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentegenol 159 (1992) 1115-1119