Surface but not volumetric part structure mediates three-dimensional shape representation: Evidence from part-whole priming

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 814-830

  Leek, E Charles ^a   Reppa, Irene ^b   Rodriguez, Elly ^a   Arguin, Martin ^c  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c CENTRE DE RECHERCHE EN NEUROPSYCHOLOGIE ET COGNITION   (Canada)

Author keywords

Object recognition; Primitives; Shape representation; Surfaces

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67651024048     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210802303826     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arguin, M., & Saumier, D. (2004). Independent processing of parts and of their spatial organisation in complex visual objects. Psychological Science, 15, 629-633.
2. Barr, A. H. (1981). Superquadrics and angle-preserving transformations. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 1, 1-11.
3. Bergevin, R., & Levine, M. D. (1993). Generic object recognition: Building and matching course descriptions from line drawings. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15, 19-63.
4. Bertamini, M. (2001). The importance of being convex: An advantage for convexity when judging position. Perception, 30, 1295-1310.
5. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image interpretation. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
6. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. (1991). Priming contourdeleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
7. Brooks, R. (1981). Symbolic reasoning among 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional images. Artificial Intelligence, 17, 285-349.
8. Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89, 60-64.
9. Edelman, S. (1999). Representation and recognition in vision. London: MIT Press.
10. Fan, T.-J., Medioni, G., & Nevatia, R. (1989). Recognizing 3-D objects using surface descriptions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 1140-1157.
11. Faugeras, O. D. (1984). New steps towards a flexible 3-D vision system for robotics. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (pp. 796-805). North Holland: IEEE Computer Society Press.
12. Guzman, A. (1968). Decomposition of a visual scene into three-dimensional bodies. In AFIPS Proceedings of the Fall Joint Computer Conference (Vol. 33, pp. 291-304). San Fransisco, CA, USA.
13. Hoffman, D. D., & Richards, W. A. (1984). Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65-96.
14. Hummel, J. E. (2001). Complementary solutions to the binding problem in vision: Implications for shape perception and object recognition. Visual Cognition, 8, 489-517.
15. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
16. Leek, E. C., Reppa, I., & Arguin, M. (2005). The structure of 3D object shape representations: Evidence from whole-part matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 668-684.
17. Lowe, D. G. (2003). Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60, 91-110.
18. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B200, 269-294.
19. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1019-1025.
20. Vetter, T., Hurlbert, A., & Poggio, T. (1995). View-based models of object recognition: Invariance to imaging transformations. Cerebral Cortex, 3, 261-269.
21. Winston, P. (1975). Learning structural descriptions from examples. In P. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Zerroug, M., & Nevatia, R. (1999). Part-based 3D descriptions of complex objects from a single image. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21, 835-848.