Short-term outcome after posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty - A randomized clinical trial

European Journal of Medical Research

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 256-263

  Witzleb, Wolf Christoph ^a,b,d   Stephan, L ^a   Krummenauer, F ^a   Neuke, A ^c   Gunther K P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

^b Hospital St Joseph Stift   (Germany)

^c Bavaria Klinik Kreischa   (Germany)

^d Forum Gesundheit Dresden   (Germany)

Author keywords

Functional result; Hip replacement; Short term result; Surgical approach

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DIRECT LATERAL SURGICAL APPROACH; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTERIOR SURGICAL APPROACH; PSYCHOMETRY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SHORT FORM 36; SURGICAL APPROACH; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67651015268     PISSN: 09492321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2047-783x-14-6-256     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baker AS, Bitounis VC. Abductor function after total hip replacement. An electromyographic and clinical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71(1):47-50.
2. Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S, Oberthaler W. The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1979;95(1-2):47-49.
3. Bellamy N. The WOMAC Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Indices: development, validation, globalization and influence on the development of the AUSCAN Hand Osteoarthritis Indices. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(5 Suppl 39):S148-153.
4. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH, Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55(8):1629-1632.
5. Bystrom S, Espehaug B, Fumes O, Havelin LI. Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74(5):514-524.
6. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972;54(1):61-76.
7. Comstock C, Imrie S, Goodman SB. A clinical and radiographic study of the "safe area" using the direct lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9(5):527-531.
8. Crowe JF, Mani VJ, Ranawat CS. Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(1):15-23.
9. Downing ND, Clark DI, Hutchinson JW, Colclough K, Howard PW. Hip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(3):215-220.
10. Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64(1):17-19.
11. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(4):737-755.
12. Jolles BM, Bogoch ER. Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD003828.
13. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(4):494-502.
14. Kenny P, O'Brien CP, Synnott K, Walsh MG. Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after two different approaches to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(6):979-981.
15. Kwon MS, Kuskowski M, Mulhall KJ, Macaulay W, Brown TE, Saleh KJ. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:34-38.
16. Li E, Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. The natural history of a posteriorly dislocated total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14(8):964-968.
17. Moore A. T. In: Surgeons AAoO, ed. Intructional course lectures. Vol 16. St. louis: CV Mosby; 1959.
18. Mulliken BD, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Nayak N. A modified direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13(7):737-747.
19. Pascarel X, Dumont D, Nehme B, Dudreuilh JP, Honton JL. [Total hip arthroplasty using the Hardinge approach. Clinical results in 63 cases]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1989;75(2):98-103.
20. Paterno SA, Lachicwicz PF, Kelley SS. The influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(8):1202-1210.
21. Ramesh M, O'Byrne JM, McCarthy N, Jarvis A, Mahalingham K, Cashman WF. Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after the Hardinge approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(6):903-906.
22. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985(198):43-49.
23. Ware JE, Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-483.