Psychosocial adjustment and life satisfaction until 5 years after severe brain damage

International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 139-147

  Sörbo, Ann K ^a,b   Blomqvist, Maritha ^a,b   Emanuelsson, Ingrid M ^a,c   Rydenhag, Bertil ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b Båda Vid Enheten För Vårdhygien   (Sweden)

^c QUEEN SILVIA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Life satisfaction; Long term follow up; Psychosocial adjustment; Severe brain injury

Indexed keywords

BRAIN-INJURED PATIENTS; CLINICAL PRACTICES; EVALUATION CHARTS; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; GROUP LEVEL; HAEMORRHAGE; HEAD INJURIES; LIFE SATISFACTION; LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP; NEURO-INTENSIVE CARE; PSYCHOSOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; REHABILITATION PLANNING; SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE; SEVERE BRAIN INJURY; SMALL DATA SET; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES; VEGETATIVE STATE;

BRAIN;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HEAD INJURY EVALUATION CHART; HUMAN; LIFE SATISFACTION; LIFE SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BRAIN INJURIES; FEMALE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PERSONAL SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67650918322     PISSN: 03425282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328325a5d1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Asgeirsson B, Grände PO, Nordström CH (1994). A new therapy of post-trauma brain oedema based on haemodynamic principles for brain volume regulation. Intensive Care Med 20:260-267. (Pubitemid 24132365)
2. Bullock MR, Merchant RE, Choi SC, Gilman CB, Kreutzer JS, Marmarou A, Teasdale GM (2002). Outcome measures for clinical trials in neurotrauma. Neurosurg Focus 13:ECP1.
3. Corrigan JD, Bogner JA, Mysiw WJ, Clinchot D, Fugate L (2001). Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 16:543-555. (Pubitemid 34015359)
4. Cudmore S, Pentland B (1996). Early experience of the utility of the European head injury evaluation chart. Brain Inj 10:517-529. (Pubitemid 26232234)
5. Engberg AW, Teasdale TW (2004). Psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury in adults: a long-term population-based follow-up. Brain Inj 18:533-545. (Pubitemid 38584631)
6. Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM (1980). Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 6:1-9.
7. Fugel-Meyer AR, Fugl-Meyer KS (1988). The coping process after traumatic brain injury. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl 17:51-53. (Pubitemid 18141746)
8. Fugl-Meyer AR, Bränholm I-B, Fugl-Meyer KS (1991). Happiness and domainspecific life satisfaction in adult northern Swedes. Clin Rehabil 5:25-33.
9. Fugl-Meyer AR, Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS (2002). Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. J Rehabil Med 34:239-246.
10. Hammond FM, Grattan KD, Sasser H, Corrigan JD, Rosenthal M, Bushnik T, Shull W (2004). Five years after traumatic brain injury: a study of individual outcomes and predictors of change in function. NeuroRehabilitation 19:25-35. (Pubitemid 38241489)
11. Harradine PG,Winstanley JB, Tate R, Cameron ID, Baguley IJ, Harris RD (2004). Severe traumatic brain injury in New South Wales: comparable outcomes for rural and urban residents. Med J Aust 181:130-134. (Pubitemid 39137117)
12. Hawley CA (2001). Return to driving after head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 70:761-766.
13. Hop JW, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, Van Gijn J (1998). Quality of life in patients and partners after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 29:798-804. (Pubitemid 28173405)
14. Hunt WE, Hess RM (1968). Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 28:14-20.
15. Jennett B, Bond M (1975). Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1:480-484.
16. Kersel DA, Marsh NV, Havill JH, Sleigh JW (2001). Psychosocial functioning during the year following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 15:683-696. (Pubitemid 32754907)
17. Lapointe LL (1999). Quality of life with aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 20:5-16; quiz 16-17
18. Mailhan L, Azouvi P, Dazord A (2005). Life satisfaction and disability after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 19:227-238. (Pubitemid 40260097)
19. Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Van Berkum Clark M, Eisenberg H, Jane JA, et al. (1992). The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. J Neurotrauma 9 (Suppl 1):S287-S292.
20. Naredi S, Eden E, Zäll S, Stephensen H, Rydenhag B (1998). A standardized neurosurgical neurointensive therapy directed toward vasogenic edema after severe traumatic brain injury: clinical results. Intensive Care Med 24:446-451. (Pubitemid 28274156)
21. Naredi S, Lambert G, Eden E, Zäll S, Runnerstam M, Rydenhag B, Friberg P (2000). Increased sympathetic nervous activity in patients with nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 31:901-906. (Pubitemid 30198436)
22. Olver JH, Ponsford JL, Curran CA (1996). Outcome following traumatic brain injury: a comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Inj 10:841-848. (Pubitemid 26366441)
23. Pagulayan KF, Temkin NR, Machamer J, Dikmen SS (2006). A longitudinal study of health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:611-618.
24. Pavot W, Diener E, Colvin CR, Sandvik E (1991). Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. J Pers Assess 57:149-161.
25. Prigatano GP (2005). Disturbances of self-awareness and rehabilitation of patients with traumatic brain injury: a 20-year perspective. J Head Trauma Rehabil 20:19-29. (Pubitemid 40250683)
26. Rosenthal M, Griffith ER, Kreutzer JS, Pentland B (1999). Rehabilitation of the adult and child. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.
27. Starmark JE, Stalhammar D, Holmgren E, Rosander B (1988). A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Reaction Level Scale (RLS85). J Neurosurg 69:699-706. (Pubitemid 18258044)
28. Svensson E (1998). Ordinal invariant measures for individual and group changes in ordered categorical data. Stat Med 17:2923-2936.
29. Svensson E (2007). ROC. http://www.oru.se/templates/oruExtNormal.aspx?id= 9746
30. Svensson E, Starmark JE (2002). Evaluation of individual and group changes in social outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a long-term follow-up study. J Rehabil Med 34:251-259. (Pubitemid 35251982)
31. Sörbo A, Rydenhag B (2001). Well-integrated chain of care results in better prognosis in severe brain injury. Lakartidningen 98: 1244-1247. (Pubitemid 33741135)
32. Sörbo A, Rydenhag B, Sunnerhagen KS, Blomqvist M, Svensson S, Emanuelson I (2005). Outcome after severe brain damage, what makes the difference? Brain Inj 19:493-503.
33. Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2:81-84.
34. Teasdale GM, Pettigrew LE, Wilson JT, Murray G, Jennett B (1998). Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma 15:587-597. (Pubitemid 28413052)
35. Testa MA, Simonson DC (1996). Assesment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med 334:835-840.
36. Tyerman A, Humphrey M (1984). Changes in self-concept following severe head injury. Int J Rehabil Res 7:11-23. (Pubitemid 14104592)
37. WHO (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Geneva: WHO.
38. Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM (1998). Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 15:573-585.