Advances in drama theory for managing global hazards and disasters. Part I: Theoretical foundation

Group Decision and Negotiation

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 303-316

  Levy, Jason K ^a   Hipel, Keith W ^b   Howard, N ^c  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Climate change; Conflict resolution; Decision support; Disaster; Drama theory; Emergency

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650912534     PISSN: 09262644     EISSN: 15729907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-008-9145-7     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baan AN, Howard N, Tait A (2003) COM as Shooter-operational planning using C2 for confronting and collaborating. CCRTS Symposium 2003; available from http://www.dodccrp.org
2. C Bellavita 2008 Changing homeland security: what is homeland security? Homel Secur Aff 2 1 13
3. Bragg B (2007) Arctic Alaska villages caught in slow-motion disaster onslaught Anchorage Daily News. http://dwb.adn.com/front/v-printer/story/ 9398619p-9311989c.html. Accessed 22 Oct 2007
4. Bryant JW (2003) The six dilemmas of collaboration. Wiley, Chichester
5. Diamond J (2004) Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed. Viking Adult, New York
6. Fang L, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (1993) Interactive decision making: the graph model for conflict resolution. Wiley, New York
7. Fraser NM, Hipel KW (1984) Conflict analysis: models and resolution. North Holland Publishing Co., New York
8. Howard N (1971) Paradoxes of rationality: games, metagames and political behavior. MIT Press 1971, Available as MIT Classic
9. N Howard 1994 Drama theory and its relation to game theory. Part 1: dramatic resolution vs. rational solution Group Decis Negot 3 187 206 10.1007/BF01384354
10. N Howard 1994 Drama theory and its relation to game theory. Part 2: formal model of the resolution process Group Decis Negot 3 207 235 10.1007/BF01384355
11. N Howard 1998 n-Person 'Soft' games J Oper Res Soc 49 144 150
12. Howard N (1999) Confrontation analysis: how to win operations other than war. CCRP publications, Pentagon, Washington DC. Available from http://www.dodccrp.org
13. Howard N (2000) How to win peace operations: theory Vs practice. CCRTS Symposium, 2000. http://www.dodccrp.org
14. Howard N (2007) Resolving conflicts in a tree: drama theory in the extensive form. http://www.ima.org.uk/conflict/papers/Howard.pdf
15. N Howard PG Bennett JW Bryant M Bradley 1992 Manifesto for a theory of drama and irrational choice J Oper Res Soc 44 99 103
16. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) The Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) February, 2007 Working Group I, Summary for Policymakers (SPM) "Physical Science Basis of Climate Change." http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html
17. Murray-Jones P, Howard N (2001) Co-coordinated positions in a drama-theoretic confrontation: mathematical foundations for a PO decision support system. CCRTS Symposium, Annapolis MD. http://www.dodccrp.org/html4/ events-past.html
18. Murray-Jones P, Stubbs L, Howard N (2003) Confrontation and collaboration analysis: experimental and mathematical results. CCRTS Symposium, Washington DC. http://www.dodccrp.org/html4/events-past.html
19. A Obeidi KW Hipel 2005 Strategic and dilemma analysis of a water export conflict INFOR 43 3 247 270 (Pubitemid 41366848)
20. Osborne MJ, Rubinstein A (1994) A course in game theory. MIT Press, New York
21. H Rittel M Webber 1973 Dilemmas in a general theory of planning Policy Sci 4 155 169 10.1007/BF01405730
22. Rosenhead J (1989) Rational analysis for a problematic world (editor). Wiley, New York
23. Smith R, Howard N, Tait A (2001) Confrontations in war and peace. CCRTS Symposium, 2001. Available from http://www.dodccrp.org
24. Smith R, Howard N, Tait A (2002) Commanding anti-terrorist coalitions: a mid-east illustration. CCRTS Symposium, 2002. Available from http://www.dodccrp.org
25. Zinni T, Koltz T (2006) The battle for peace: a frontline vision of America's power and purpose. Palgrave Macmillan, New York