Comparability of methods for LDL subfraction determination: A systematic review

Atherosclerosis

Volumn 205, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 342-348

  Chung, Mei ^a   Lichtenstein, Alice H ^a,b   Ip, Stanley ^a   Lau, Joseph ^a   Balk, Ethan M ^a  

^a TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical chemistry tests; LDL subfractions; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL CHEMISTRY; GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; GEL FILTRATION CHROMATOGRAPHY; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIPID ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; REFERENCE VALUE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ULTRACENTRIFUGATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CHEMISTRY, CLINICAL; CHOLESTEROL, LDL; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GEL; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; ELECTROPHORESIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 67650912351     PISSN: 00219150     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.12.011     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Balk E, Ip S, Chung M, Lau J, Lichtenstein A. Low Density Lipoprotein Subfractions: Systematic Review of Measurement Methods and Association with Cardiovascular Outcomes. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment (Prepared by Tufts Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center, under contract No. 290-02-0022). Rockville, MD. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; June 16, 2008. (http://www1.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewtechassess.asp?from2=viewtechassess.asp&where=index&tid=56&).
2. Expert Panel on Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486-97.
3. Krauss R.M. Dense low density lipoproteins and coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 75 (1995) 53B-57B
4. Krauss R.M. Dietary and genetic effects on low-density lipoprotein heterogeneity. Annu Rev Nutr 21 (2001) 283-295
5. Chapman M.J., Guerin M., and Bruckert E. Atherogenic, dense low-density lipoproteins. Pathophysiology and new therapeutic approaches. Eur Heart J 19 Suppl 30 (1998)
6. Berneis K.K., and Krauss R.M. Metabolic origins and clinical significance of LDL heterogeneity. J Lipid Res 43 (2002) 1363-1379
7. Scheffer P.G., Bakker S.J., Heine R.J., and Teerlink T. Measurement of low-density lipoprotein particle size by high-performance gel-filtration chromatography. Clin Chem 43 (1997) 1904-1912
8. Scheffer P.G., Bakker S.J., Heine R.J., and Teerlink T. Measurement of LDL particle size in whole plasma and serum by high performance gel-filtration chromatography using a fluorescent lipid probe. Clin Chem 44 (1998) 2148-2151
9. Hirany S.V., Othman Y., Kutscher P., Rainwater D.L., Jialal I., and Devaraj S. Comparison of low-density lipoprotein size by polyacrylamide tube gel electrophoresis and polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis. Am J Clin Pathol 119 (2003) 439-445
10. Jeyarajah E.J., Cromwell W.C., and Otvos J.D. Lipoprotein particle analysis by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Clin Lab Med 26 (2006) 847-870
11. Blake G.J., Otvos J.D., Rifai N., and Ridker P.M. Low-density lipoprotein particle concentration and size as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as predictors of cardiovascular disease in women. Circulation 106 (2002) 1930-1937
12. Witte D.R., Taskinen M.R., Perttunen-Nio H., van T.A., Livingstone S., and Colhoun H.M. Study of agreement between LDL size as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance and gradient gel electrophoresis. J Lipid Res 45 (2004) 1069-1076
13. Ensign W., Hill N., and Heward C.B. Disparate LDL phenotypic classification among 4 different methods assessing LDL particle characteristics. Clin Chem 52 (2006) 1722-1727
14. Hoefner D.M., Hodel S.D., O'Brien J.F., et al. Development of a rapid, quantitative method for LDL subfractionation with use of the Quantimetrix Lipoprint LDL System. Clin Chem 47 (2001) 266-274
15. Davy B.M., and Davy K.P. Comparison of assessment techniques: plasma lipid and lipoproteins related to the metabolic syndrome. Lipids Health Dis 5 (2006) 3
16. Dormans T.P., Swinkels D.W., de G.J., Hendriks J.C., Stalenhoef A.F., and Demacker P.N. Single-spin density-gradient ultracentrifugation vs gradient gel electrophoresis: two methods for detecting low-density-lipoprotein heterogeneity compared. Clin Chem 37 (1991) 853-858
17. O'Neal D., Harrip P., Dragicevic G., Rae D., and Best J.D. A comparison of LDL size determination using gradient gel electrophoresis and light-scattering methods. J Lipid Res 39 (1998) 2086-2090
18. Davies I.G., Graham J.M., and Griffin B.A. Rapid separation of LDL subclasses by iodixanol gradient ultracentrifugation. Clin Chem 49 (2003) 1865-1872
19. Fryback D.G., and Thornbury J.R. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 11 (1991) 88-94
20. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
21. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20 (1960) 37-46
22. Miller G.W., Myers G.L., and Rei R. Why commutability matters. Clin Chem 52 (2006) 553-554