Description of functional disability among younger stroke patients: Exploration of activity and participation and environmental factors

International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 124-131

  Snögren, Maria ^a,b   Sunnerhagen, Katharina Stibrant ^b,c,d  

^a HALMSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^d SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Activity; Environment; International classification of functioning and health; Participation; Stroke; Stroke impact scale

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY; ENVIRONMENT; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING AND HEALTH; PARTICIPATION; STROKE; STROKE IMPACT SCALE;

INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION; SWITCHING CIRCUITS;

HEALTH;

ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; DISABILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; STROKE IMPACT SCALE; STROKE PATIENT;

ADULT; COMMUNICATION; COMORBIDITY; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SELF CARE; STROKE; SWEDEN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67650899475     PISSN: 03425282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328325a5be     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bjorkdahl A, Nilsson AL, Grimby G, Sunnerhagen KS (2006). Does a short period of rehabilitation in the home setting facilitate functioning after stroke? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 20:1038-1049. (Pubitemid 46128608)
2. Bonita R, Beaglehole R (1988). Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke 19:1497-1500.
3. Carlsson GE, Moller A, Blomstrand C (2003). Consequences of mild stroke in persons >75 years: a 1-year follow-up. Cerebrovasc Dis 16:383-388. (Pubitemid 37140428)
4. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G (2005). ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 37:212-218. (Pubitemid 41025328)
5. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Minlai S, Perera S (2003a). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:950-963.
6. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Bode RK, Perera S, Derosa J (2003b). Stroke Impact Scale-16: a brief assessment of physical function. Neurology 60:291-296. (Pubitemid 36152025)
7. Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, Dickson H, Frommelt P, Omar Z, et al. (2004a). ICF Core Sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med (44 suppl):135-141.
8. Geyh S, Kurt T, Brockow T, Cieza A, Ewert T, Omar Z, Resch KL (2004b). Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on stroke using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. J Rehabil Med (44 suppl):56-62. (Pubitemid 39307112)
9. Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, Avni N, Katz N (2007). Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disabil Rehabil 29: 559-566. (Pubitemid 46534746)
10. Hofgren C, Bjorkdahl A, Esbjornsson E, Stibrant-Sunnerhagen K (2007). Recovery after stroke: cognition, ADL function and return to work. Acta Neurol Scand 115:73-80. (Pubitemid 46018540)
11. Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S (2002). Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke 33:1840-1844. (Pubitemid 34761072)
12. Medin J, Barajas J, Ekberg K (2006). Stroke patients' experiences of return to work. Disabil Rehabil 28:1051-1060. (Pubitemid 44322641)
13. Pajalic Z, Karlsson S, Westergren A (2006). Functioning and subjective health among stroke survivors after discharge from hospital. J Adv Nurs 54:457-466.
14. Riks-stroke annual report (2005). http://www.riks-stroke.org/files/ contents.html.
15. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J, Bayley M (2005). Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil 27:507-528.
16. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN (2003). The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 49:156-163. (Pubitemid 36418272)
17. Schneidert M, Hurst R, Miller J, Ustun B (2003). The role of environment in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 25:588-595.
18. Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Ustun TB (2002). Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil 24:281-282. (Pubitemid 34428803)
19. Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A (2003). Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 25:628-634. (Pubitemid 36806197)
20. Teasell RW, Mcrae MP, Finestone HM (2000). Social issues in the rehabilitation of younger stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:205-209. (Pubitemid 30080680)
21. Tyson SF, Chillala J, Hanley M, Selley AB, Tallis RC (2006). Distribution of weakness in the upper and lower limbs post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil 28:715-719. (Pubitemid 43753526)
22. Van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, Van Gijn J (1988). Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 19:604-607. (Pubitemid 18126965)
23. Weigl M, Cieza A, Andersen C, Kollerits B, Amann E, Stucki G (2004). Identification of relevant ICF categories in patients with chronic health conditions: a Delphi exercise. J Rehabil Med (44 suppl):12-21. (Pubitemid 39307106)
24. WHO (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.
25. Wilson JT, Hareendran A, Hendry A, Potter J, Bone I, Muir KW (2005). Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview. Stroke 36:777-781. (Pubitemid 40490624)