Acoustic emission monitoring and 3D visualization of polymerization-induced damage of acrylic polymer materials

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 90 B, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 223-228

  Mavrogordato, Mark ^a   Taylor, Mark ^a   Taylor, Andrew ^b   Browne, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b Finsbury Development Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acrylic; Bone cement; Joint replacement; PMMA; Polymerization

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC EMISSION TESTING; ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS; ACOUSTICS; BONE; CEMENTS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CONCRETE MIXING; HIP PROSTHESES; INSPECTION; MEDICAL IMAGING; POLYMERIZATION; POLYMERS; SHRINKAGE; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; TOMOGRAPHY;

3D VISUALIZATION; ACOUSTIC EMISSION MONITORING; ACOUSTIC EMISSION TECHNIQUES; ACRYLIC POLYMERS; CEMENT MANTLE; CEMENT SHRINKAGE; DAMAGE INITIATION; DOMINANT FACTOR; EXOTHERM; EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE; INDUCED DAMAGE; INSPECTION METHODS; JOINT REPLACEMENT; MICRO CT; MICROCOMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION TECHNIQUES; PEAK TEMPERATURES; PMMA; POST-POLYMERIZATION; PRELOAD; REAL TIME; SERIAL SECTIONING; THERMAL CONTRACTION; TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS; VACUUM MIXING; VOLUMETRIC SHRINKAGE;

BONE CEMENT;

DYE; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ARTICLE; DESTRUCTION; FIELD EMISSION; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; POLYMERIZATION; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ACOUSTICS; ACRYLATES; POLYMERS;

EID: 67650831903     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31276     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Dunne N, Orr J. Influence of mixing techniques on the physical properties of acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 2001;22: 1819-1826. (Pubitemid 32564971)
2. James S, Schmalzried T, McGarry F, Harris W. Extensive porosity at the cement-femoral prosthesis interface: A preliminary study. J Biomed Mater Res 2004;27:71-78.
3. Wixson R, Lautenschlager E, Novak M. Vacuum mixing of acrylic bone cement. J Arthroplasty 1987;2:141-149. (Pubitemid 17133525)
4. Messick K, Miller M, Damron L, Race A, Clarke MT, Mann KA. Vacuum-mixing cement does not decrease overall porosity in cemented femoral stems an in vitro laboratory investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:1115-1121. (Pubitemid 47492811)
5. Muller S, Green S, McCaskie A. The dynamic volume changes of polymerising polymethyl methacrylate bone cement. Acta Orthop Scand 2002;73:684-687. (Pubitemid 36020915)
6. Kwong F, Power R. A comparison of the shrinkage of commercial bone cements when mixed under vacuum. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:120-122. (Pubitemid 43125327)
7. Li C, Wang Y, Mason J. The effects of curing history on residual stresses in bone cement during hip arthroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res B 2004;70:30-36. (Pubitemid 38849987)
8. Lennon A, Prendergast P. Residual stress due to curing can initiate damage in porous bone cement: Experimental and theoretical evidence. J Biomech 2002;35:311-321. (Pubitemid 34150175)
9. Gilbert J, Hasenwinkel J, Wixson R, Lautenschlager E. A theoretical and experimental analysis of polymerization shrinkage of bone cement: A potential major source of porosity. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;52:210-218. (Pubitemid 30490999)
10. Orr J, Dunne N, Quinn J. Shrinkage stresses in bone cement. Biomaterials 2003;24:2933-2940.
11. Race A, Miller M, Ayers D, Mann K. Early cement damage around a femoral stem is concentrated at the cement/bone interface. J Biomech 2003;36:489-496. (Pubitemid 36207579)
12. Roques A, Browne M, Taylor A, New A, Baker D. Quantitative measurement of the stresses induced during polymerisation of bone cement. Biomaterials 2004;25:4415-4424. (Pubitemid 38388601)
13. Vadivelu R, Baker A, Chetwynd D. Mechanical testing of the wire clamping characteristics of the FixclipTM internal fixation system. J Eng Med 2002;216:347-351.
14. http://www.ndt.net/article/az/ae/hsunielsensource.htm.
15. Liu C, Green S, Wakins N, Gregg P, McCaskie A. Some failure modes of four clinical bone cements. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2001;215:359-366.
16. www.kulzer-technik.de.
17. Kwong F, Power R. Comparison of bone cement shrinkage between different polymethylmethacrylate commercial preparations in use. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(SUPP-II): 237.
18. Wang J, Franzén H, Toksvig-Larsen S, Lidgren L. Does vacuum mixing of bone cement affect heat generation? Analysis of four cement brands. J Appl Biomater 2004;6:105-108.
19. Baliga B, Rose P, Ahmed A. Thermal modelling of polymerizing polymethylmethacrylate, considering temperature dependent heat generation. J Biomech Eng 1992;114:251-259.
20. Starke G, Birnie C, van den Blink P. Numerical modelling of cement polymerisation and thermal bone necrosis. In: Middleton J, Jones M, Pande G, editors. London: Gordon and Breach; 1997. pp 163-172.
21. Roques A, Browne M, Thompson J, Rowland C, Taylor A. Investigation of fatigue crack growth in acrylic bone cement using the acoustic emission technique. Biomaterials 2004;25: 769-778. (Pubitemid 37371986)
22. Bishop N, Ferguson S, Tepic S. Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:349-356. (Pubitemid 26158817)
23. Iesaka K, Jaffe W, Kummer F. Effects of preheating of hip prostheses on the stem-cement interface. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:421-427. (Pubitemid 36538745)