Influence of electromagnetic fields on bone fracture in rats: Role of CAPE

Biomedical and Environmental Sciences

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 157-160

  Cicek, Ekrem ^a   Gokalp, Osman ^b   Varol, Remzi ^c   Cesur, Gokhan ^d  

^a MEHMET AKIF ERSOY UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Department of Pharmacology ^*

^c Faculty of Engineering

^d SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Biomechanical study; Caffeic acid phenethyl ester; Mobile phone

Indexed keywords

RATTUS;

EID: 67650829094     PISSN: 08953988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-3988(09)60039-8     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Savitz A D, Loomis P (1995). Magnetic Fields exposure inrelation to leukemia and brain cancer mortality among Electric utility workers. Am J Epidemiol 141 (2), 123-134.
2. Barnothy J M (1964). Development of young mice. In: Barnothy MF (ed). Biological effects of magnetic fields. New York, Plenum Press pp. 93-99.
3. Coelho A M, Roger W R Jr, Smith H D (1995). Effects of current exposure to 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields on thesocial behavior of baboons. Bioelectromagnetics Supplement 3, 71-92.
4. Rothman K J, Loughlin J E, Funch D P, et al. (1996). Overall mortality of cellular telephone customers. Epidemiology 7, 303-305.
5. Tabrah F L, Ross P, Hoffmeier M, et al. (1998). Clinical report on long-term bone density after short-term EMF application. Bioelectromagnetics 19, 75-78.
6. Knave B (2001). Electromagnetic fields and health outcomes. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 30 (5), 489-493.
7. Becker R O (1978). Electrical osteogenesis-Pro end Co. Calcif Tissue Res 26, 93-97.
8. Bassett C A L, Pawluk R J, Pilla A A (1974). Augmentation of bone repair by inductively coupled electromagnetic fields. Science 184, 575-577.
9. Archer C, Ratcliffe N (1981). The effects of pulsed magnetic fields on bone and cartilage in vitro. Trans Bioelec Rep Rowth Soc 1, 1.
10. Jamsa T, Tuukkanen J, Jalovaara P (1998). Femoral neck strength of mouse in two loading configurations: method evaluation and fracture characteristics. Journal of Biomechnics 31, 723-729.
11. Jamsa T, Jalovaara P, Peng Z, et al. (1998). Comparison of Three-Point Bending Test and Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography Analysis in the evaluation of the Strength of Mouse Femur and Tibia. Bone 3 (2), 155-161.
12. Reiter J R (1998). Melatonin in the context of the reported bioeffects of environmental electromagnetic fields. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics 47, 135-142.
13. Heikkinen P, Kosma V M, Alhonen L, et al. (2003). Effects of mobile phone radiation on UV-induced skin tumourigenesis in ornithine decarboxylase transgenic and non-transgenic mice. Int J Radiat Biol 79 (4), 221-233.
14. Aday W R, Lawrence A F (1984). Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems. New York: Plenum.
15. Riggs B L, Melton L J (1986). III Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 314, 1676-1686.
16. Giavaresi G, Frni M, Gnudi S, et al. (1999). Effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on ovariectomized rats. Electro-Magnetobiol 18, 119-131.
17. McElhaney J H, Stalnaker R, Bullard R (1968). Electric fields and bone loss of disuse. J Biomech 1, 47-52.
18. Orban Z, Mitsiades N, Burke T R Jr, et al. (2000). Caffeic acid phenethyl ester induces leukocyte apoptosis, modulates nuclear factor-kappa B and suppresses acute inflammation. Neuroimmunomodul 7, 99-105.
19. Fitzpatrick L R, Wang J, Le T (2001). Caffeic acid phenethyl ester, an inhibitor of nuclear factor-KB, attenuates bacterial peptidoglycan polysaccharide-induced colitis in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 299, 915-920.
20. Repacholi M H (2001). Health risks from the use of mobile phones. Toxicol Lett 120 (1-3), 323-331.
21. Yildiz M, Cicek E, Cerci S, et al. (2006). Influence of electromagnetic fields and protective effect of CAPE on bone mineral density in rats. Arch Med Res 37 (7), 818-821.