Intravascular neural interface with nanowire electrode

Electronics and Communications in Japan

Volumn 92, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 29-37

  Watanabe, Hirobumi ^a   Takahashi, Hirokazu ^b   Nakao, Masayuki ^c   Walton, Kerry ^a   Llinás, Rodolfo R ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Brain computer interface; Catheter; Neural interface; Vessel; Wollaston wire

Indexed keywords

BRAIN AREAS; BRAIN MACHINE INTERFACE; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEMS; ELECTRICAL RECORDING; EX-VIVO; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS; FABRICATION METHOD; INTRAVASCULAR; MINIMALLY INVASIVE; MULTIPLE NEURONS; NEURAL INTERFACE; NEURAL INTERFACES; PLATINUM WIRE; POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS; SPINAL CORDS; SUBMICRON SCALE; VASCULAR SYSTEM; VESSEL; WOLLASTON WIRE; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

CATHETERS; ELECTRIC WIRE; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NANOWIRES; NEURONS; OPTICAL SENSORS; PLATINUM; SAILING VESSELS; WIRE;

INTERFACES (COMPUTER);

EID: 67650829085     PISSN: 19429533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ecj.10058     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Llinás R, Makarov V. Brain machine interface via a neurovascular approach. In Roco M, Bainbridge WS (editors). Converging technologies for improving human performance. Springer Academic Press; 2004. p 244-251.
2. Llinás R, Walton KD, Nakao M, Hunter IW, Anquetil PA. Neurovascular central nervous recording/stimulating system using nanotechnology probes. J Nanopart Res 2005;7(2-3):111-121.
3. Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MA. Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci 2006;29:536-546.
4. Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, McFarland DJ, Pfurtscheller G, Vaughan TM. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:767-791.
5. Kauhanen L, Nykopp T, Sams M. Classification of single MEG trials related to left and right index finger movements. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:430-439.
6. Kamitani Y, Tong F. Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nature Neurosci 2005;8:679-685.
7. Maynard EM, Nordhausen CT, Normann RA. The Utah Intracortical Electrode Array: a recording structure for potential brain-computer interfaces. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1997;102:228-239.
8. Wessberg J, Stambaugh CR, Kralik JD, Beck PD, Laubach M, Chapin JK, Kim J, Biggs SJ, Srinivasan MA, Nicolelis MAL. Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates. Nature 2000;408:361-365.
9. Santhanam G, Ryu SI, Yu BM, Afshar A, Shenoy KV. A high-performance brain-computer interface. Nature 2006;442:195-198.
10. Hochberg LR, Serruya MD, Friehs GM, Mukand JA, Saleh M, Caplan AH, Branner A, Chen D, Penn RD, Donoghue JP. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature 2006;442:164-171.
11. Levine SP, Huggins JE, BeMent SL, Kushwaha RK, Schuh LA, Rohde MM, Passaro EA, Ross DA, Elisevich KV, Smith BJ. A direct brain interface based on event-related potentials. IEEE Trans Rehab Eng 2006;8:180-185.
12. Mehring C, Rickert J, Vaadia E, de Oliveira SC, Aertsen A, Rotter S. Inference of hand movements from local field potentials in monkey motor cortex. Nature Neurosci 2003;6:1253-1254.
13. Nishino K. Flow field measurement of micro flows. Nagare 2001;20:83-91.
14. Walter FB, Emile LB. In: Medical physiology. Saunders; 2003. p 449.
15. Duvernoy HM, Delon S, Vannson JL. Cortical blood vessels of the human brain. Brain Res Bull 1981;7:519-579.
16. Okada S, Schraufnagel DE. Microvasculature of the olfactory organ in the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata fuscata). Microsc Microanal 2002;8:159-169.
17. Tanaka E, Tanaka A, Sekka T, Shinozaki Y, Hyogo K, Umetani K, Mori H. Digitized cerebral synchrotron radiation angiography: Quantitative evaluation of the canine circle of Willis and its large and small branches. Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:801-806.
18. Sarnelli A, Nemoz C, Elleaume H, Esteve F, Bertrand B, Bravin A. Quantitative analysis of synchrotron radiation intravenous angiographic images. Phys Med Biol 2005;50:725-740.
19. Hoi Y, Meng H, Woodward SH, Bendok BR, Hanel RA, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Effects of arterial geometry on aneurysm growth: three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics study. J Neurosurg 2004;101:676-681.
20. Ruddy B, Watanabe H, Hunter I, Llinás R. Production of conducting polymer nanowires for use as intravascular neural recording electrodes. Technical Proceedings of the 2006 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show 2:808-811.
21. Takahashi H, Suzurikawa J, Nakao M, Mase F, Kaga K. Easy-to-prepare assembly array of tungsten microelectrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005;52: 952-956.
22. Norena A, Eggermont JJ. Comparison between local field potentials and unit cluster activity in primary auditory cortex and anterior auditory field in the cat. Hear Res 2002;166:202-213.
23. Gray CM, Maldonado PE, Wilson M, McNaughton B. Tetrodes markedly improve the reliability and yield of multiple single-unit isolation from multi-unit recordings in cat striate cortex. J Neurosci Method 1995;63:43-54.
24. Frien A, Eckhorn R. Functional coupling shows stronger stimulus dependency for fast oscillations than for low-frequency components in striate cortex of awake monkey. Eur J Neurosci 2000;12:1466-1478.