Thermal processing of waste organic substrates: Developing and applying an integrated framework for feasibility assessment in developing countries

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 2156-2162

  Karagiannidis, A ^a   Wittmaier, M ^b   Langer, S ^b   Bilitewski, B ^c   Malamakis, A ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b HOCHSCHULE BREMEN   (Germany)

^c Institute of Waste Management and Contaminated Site Treatment   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomass; Decentralized electricity; Developing countries

Indexed keywords

BIOGAS PLANTS; DATA COLLECTION; DECENTRALIZED ELECTRICITY; ENERGY GENERATIONS; FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGES; INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS; INTEGRATED FRAMEWORKS; ORGANIC SUBSTRATE; ORGANIC WASTES; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY SECTOR; TARGET GROUP; THERMAL PROCESSING; VIET NAM;

BIOGAS; BIOMASS; CLIMATE CHANGE; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; FOSSIL FUELS; PLANNING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SEWAGE;

ENERGY CONVERSION;

EID: 67650754177     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.035     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Klass D. Biomass for RE and fuels. Encyclop Energy 1 (2004) 193
2. United Nations. Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change; 1998.
3. Kaltschmitt M., Thrän D., and Smith K. Renewable energy from biomass. Encyclop Phys Sci Technol (2004) 203-228
4. Liu X. The monetary compensation mechanism: an alternative to the clean development mechanism. Ecol Econ 66 (2008) 289-297
5. United Nations Climate Change Secretariat. Framework convention on climate change; 2007.
6. Swinton J.R., and Sarkar Z.A. The benefits of the Kyoto Protocol to developing countries. Environ Dev Sustain 10 (2008) 731-743
7. 2 trading: a familiar problem. Report 42. Cambridge: Joint program on the science and policy of global change; 1998.
8. Ramanathan R. Successful transfer of environmentally sound technologies for greenhouse gas mitigation: a framework for matching the needs of developing countries. Ecol Econ J 42 (2002) 117-129
9. Parikh J.K., and Kathuria V.K. Technology transfer for GHG reduction: a framework and case studies for India. STAP Workshop. Amsterdam, The Netherlands (January 1997)
10. Diaz L., Savage G., and Eggerth L. Solid waste management. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2005) 1
11. Mitchell C., Bridgewater A., Stevens D., Toft A., and Watters M. Technoeconomic assessment of biomass to energy. Biomass Bioenergy 9 (1995) 205-226
12. McCormick K., and Kåberger T. Key barriers for bioenergy in Europe: economic conditions, know-how and institutional capacity, and supply chain co-ordination. Biomass Bioenergy 31 7 (2007) 443-452
13. Quyhn D. Phu Quoc's framework conditions for the implementation of RE (electricity and heat) from compost and biogas. RENEW project workshop, Phu Quoc, Vietnam; December 2005.
14. Dalheimer F, Heerenklage J, Stegmann R. A multichamber anaerobic dry fermentation plant for the pretreatment of MSW. In: Cossu, Christensen, Stegmann, editors. Proceedings of Sardinia'99, International symposium, vol. I, Cagliari, Italy, pp. 443-6.
15. Kottner M. Dry fermentation-a new method for biological treatment (2005), International Biogas and Bioenergy Centre of Competence, Jagst, Germany p. 16