Prioritizing clinical preventive services: A review and framework with implications for community preventive services

Annual Review of Public Health

Volumn 30, Issue , 2009, Pages 341-355

  Maciosek, Michael V ^a   Coffield, Ashley B ^b   Edwards, Nichol M ^a   Flottemesch, Thomas J ^a   Solberg, Leif I ^a  

^a HEALTHPARTNERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

^b Partnership for Prevention   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost effectiveness; Prevention; Priority setting

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY CARE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; REVIEW; SOCIAL WELFARE; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; GOALS; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 67650751085     PISSN: 01637525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100253     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Adam T, Aikins M, Evans D. 2007. CostIt Software. http://www.who.int/choice/toolkit/Costit% 20UserGuide%20(version%204.5).pdf
2. Agency Healthc. Res. Quality. 2008. National healthcare disparities report. Rep. AHRQ Publication No. 08-0041, Agency Healthc. Res. Quality, Rockville, MD
3. Bryan S,Walsh P. 2004. Physical activity and obesity in Canadian women. BMC Womens Health 4(Suppl.1):S6
4. Carter R, Stone C, Vos T, Hocking J, Mihalopoulos C, et al. 2000. Trial of Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) to assist cancer control planning in Australia. Res. Rep. 19. PBMA Series No 5: Summ. Rep., Cent. Health Progr. Eval.,West Heidelberg, Aust.
5. Coffield AB, Maciosek MV,McGinnis JM, Harris JR, Caldwell MB, et al. 2001. Priorities among recommended clinical preventive services. Am. J. Prev. Med. 21:1-9
6. Dalziel K, Segal L. 2007. Time to give nutrition interventions a higher profile: cost-effectiveness of 10 nutrition interventions. Health Promot. Int. 22:271-83
7. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. 2005. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
8. Druss BG, Marcus SC, Olfson M, Pincus HA. 2002. The most expensive medical conditions in America. Health Aff. (Millwood ) 21:105-11
9. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Rusell LB,Weinstein MC. 1996. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
10. Gyrd-Hansen D. 1999. The relative economics of screening for colorectal cancer, breast cancer and cervical cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 32:133-44
11. Haby MM, Tonge B, Littlefield L, Carter R, Vos T. 2004. Cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for major depression in children and adolescents. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 38:579-91
12. Haby MM, Vos T, Carter R, Moodie M, Markwick A, et al. 2006. A new approach to assessing the health benefit from obesity interventions in children and adolescents: the assessing cost-effectiveness in obesity project. Int. J. Obes. (London) 30:1463-75
13. Haddix AC, Teutsch SM, Shaffer PA, Dũ net DO, eds. 1996. Prevention Effectiveness: A Guide to Decision Analysis and Economic Evaluation. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
14. HamC. 1997. Priority setting in health care: learning from international experience. Health Policy 42:49-66
15. Hauck K, Smith PC, Goddard M. 2004. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Washington, DC:World Bank
16. Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, et al. eds. 2006. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: Oxford Univ. Press/World Bank
17. Jones J, Hunter D. 1995. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 311:376-80
18. Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Edwards NM, Flottemesch TJ, Goodman MJ, Solberg LI. 2006. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis. Am. J. Prev. Med. 31:52-61
19. Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, McGinnis JM, Harris JR, Caldwell MB, et al. 2001. Methods for priority setting among clinical preventive services. Am. J. Prev. Med. 21:10-19
20. Maciosek MV, Edwards NM, Coffield AB, Flottemesch TJ, Nelson WW, et al. 2006. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: methods. Am. J. Prev. Med. 31:90-96
21. Maxwell RJ, ed. 1995. Br. Med. Bull. Ser. Expert Rev. Ration. Health Care 51 [4]. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone
22. McGinnis JM, Foege WH. 1993. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA 270:2207-12
23. Mihalopoulos C, Cadilhac DA, Moodie ML, Dewey HM, Thrift AG, et al. 2005. Development and application of Model of Resource Utilization, Costs, and Outcomes for Stroke (MORUCOS): an Australian economic model for stroke. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 21:499-505
24. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. 2004. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA 291:1238-45
25. Moodie ML, Carter R, Mihalopoulos C, Thrift AG, Chambers BR, et al. 2004. Trial application of a Model of Resource Utilization, Costs, and Outcomes for Stroke (MORUCOS) to assist priority setting in stroke. Stroke 35:1041-46
26. Mortimer D, Segal L. 2005. Economic evaluation of interventions for problem drinking and alcohol dependence: cost per QALY estimates. Alcohol. Alcohol. 40:549-55
27. Natl. Comm. Prev. Prior. 2007. Preventive Care: A National Profile on Use, Disparities, and Health Benefits. Washington, DC: Partnersh. Prev. http://www.prevent.org/images/stories/2007/ ncpp/ ncpp%20preventive%20care%20report.pdf
28. Natl. Inst. Health Res. 2008. Health Technology Assessment programme. http://www.hta.ac.uk/research/ index.shtml
29. Or.Health Serv. Comm. 2007. Prioritization of Health Services. A Report to the Governor and the 74th Oregon Legislative Assembly. http://www.oregon.gov/OHPPR/HSC/docs/07HSCBiennialReport.pdf
30. Partnersh. Prev. 2001. What Policymakers Need to Know about Cost Effectiveness. Washington, DC: Partnersh. Prev. http://www.prevent.org/ images/stories/Files/publications/Cost Effectivness.pdf
31. Pinkerton SD, Johnson-Masotti AP, Holtgrave DR, Farnham PG. 2001. Using cost-effectiveness league tables to compare interventions to prevent sexual transmission of HIV. AIDS 15:917-28
32. Sabik LM, Lie RK. 2008. Priority setting in health care: lessons from the experiences of eight countries. Int. J. Equity Health 7:4
33. Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Dong FB, Chattopadhyay SK, Nadel MR, et al. 2004. Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States? Gastroenterology 127:1661-69
34. Seeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, Nadel MR, Manninen DL, et al. 2004. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology 127:1670-77
35. Cochrane Libr. 2008. The Cochrane Library. http://www3. interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/ mrwhome/106568753/HOME?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
36. Task Force Community Prev. Serv. 2008. The Community Guide. http://www.thecommunityguide.org
37. Thorpe KE, Florence CS, Joski P. 2004. Which medical conditions account for the rise in health care spending? Health Aff. (Millwood) Suppl.Web Exclus.:W4-437-45
38. U.S. Prev. Serv. Task Force. 2008. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm
39. Vernon SW. 1997. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 89:1406-22
40. Vos T,HabyMM,Magnus A, Mihalopoulos C, Andrews G, Carter R. 2005. Assessing cost-effectiveness in mental health: helping policy-makers prioritize and plan health services. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 39:701-12
41. Wen L, Badgett R, Cornell J. 2005. Number needed to treat: a descriptor for weighing therapeutic options. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 62:2031-36
42. World Bank. 1993. World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
43. World Health Organ. 2008. CHOosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE). http://www.who.int/choice/en/