Hysterosalpingography: Technique and Applications

Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 199-205

  Chalazonitis, Athanasios ^a   Tzovara, Ioanna ^b   Laspas, Fotios ^b   Porfyridis, Petros ^a   Ptohis, Nikos ^a   Tsimitselis, Georgios ^c  

^a KAT HOSPITAL   (Greece)

^b IASO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF LARISSA   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DOXYCYCLINE; IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; METRONIDAZOLE;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; BACTERIAL INFECTION; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COLIC; CONTRAST MEDIUM EXTRAVASATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; ENDOMETRIOSIS; ENDOMETRIUM HYPERPLASIA; ENDOMETRIUM POLYP; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FLUOROSCOPY; GRANULOMA; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; HYDROSALPINX; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KIDNEY DISEASE; LEIOMYOMA; PREDICTION; PREGNANCY; RADIOLOGIST; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SALPINGITIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYNCOPE; UTERINE TUBE DISEASE; UTERUS BLEEDING; UTERUS CANCER; UTERUS CAVITY; UTERUS DISEASE; UTERUS MALFORMATION; UTERUS PERFORATION; UTERUS RUPTURE; UTERUS SYNECHIA; VAGINA BLEEDING;

FALLOPIAN TUBE DISEASES; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; LEIOMYOMA; SALPINGITIS; UTERINE DISEASES; UTERINE NEOPLASMS; UTERUS;

EID: 67650744768     PISSN: 03630188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2008.02.003     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Baramki T.A. Hysterosalpingography. Mod Trends 83 (2005) 1595
2. Schwabe M.G., Shapiro S.S., and Haning Jr. R.V. Hysterosalpingography with oil contrast medium enhances fertility in patients with infertility of unknown etiology. Fertil Steril 40 (1983) 604-606
3. Livsey R. Hysterosalpingography. Australas Radiol 45 (2001) 98-99
4. Simpson W., Beitia L.G., and Mester J. Hysterosalpingography: A reemerging study. Radiographics 26 (2006) 419-431
5. Eng C.W., Tang P.H., and Ong C.L. Hysterosalpingography: Current applications. Singapore Med J 48 (2007) 368-373
6. American College of Radiology. ACR standard for the performance of hysterosalpingography. ACR Standards (2001), ACR, Reston, VA 183-186
7. Soares S.R., Reis M.M.B.B., and Camargos A.F. Diagnostic accuracy of soundhysterosalpingography, transvaginal sonography and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity disorders. Fertil Steril 73 (2000) 406-411
8. Lees W.R., and Highman S.H. Gynecological imaging. In: Sutton D. (Ed). Textbook of Radiology and Imaging (1988), Churchill Livingstone, New York 1235-1272
9. Crofton M., and Jenkins P.R.J. Hysterosalpingography. In: Sutton D. (Ed). Textbook of Radiology and Imaging. 7th edition (2003), Churchill Livingstone, New York 1085-1086
10. Dhaliwal L.K., Gupta U.R., and Aggarwall N. Is hysterosalpingography an important tool in modern gynecological practice?. Int J Fertil Womens Med 44 (1999) 212-215
11. Meschan I. Analysis of Roentgen signs. Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol 3 (1983), WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA 1896-1907
12. Thurmond A.S., Jones M.K., Cohen D.L., et al. Procedures for diagnosis and treatment of infertility. In: Gynecologic, Obstetric and Breast Radiology (1996), Blackwell Science, Cambridge p. 114-34
13. Steiner A.Z., Meyer W.R., Clark R.L., et al. Oil-soluble contrast during hysterosalpingography in women with proven tubal potency. Obstec Gynecol 101 (2003) 109-113
14. Ramsuen F., Lindequist S., Larsen C., et al. Therapeutic effects of hysterosalpingography: oil- versus water-soluble contrast media-A randomized prospective study. Radiology 179 (1991) 75-78
15. Spring D.B., Barkan H.E., and Pruyn S.C. Potential therapeutic effects of contrast materials in hysterosalpingography: A prospective randomised clinical trial. Radiology 214 (2000) 53-57
16. Chalazonitis A.N., Tzovara J., and Tsimitselis G. Hysterosalpingography. A Pictorial Review. From: 91th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America. Feb 10-12 (2005) Chicago, IL
17. Measday B. An analysis of the complications of hysterosalpingography. J Obstet Gynecol Br Emp 67 (1960) 663
18. Siegler A.M. Dangers of hysterosalpingography. Obstet Gynecol Surg 22 (1967) 284
19. Dahnert W. Obstetric and gynaecological disorders. Radiology Review Manual (1996), Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD 763-4
20. Trolano R.M., and McCarthy S.M. Mullerian duct anomalies: Imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 233 (2004) 19-34
21. Stampe Sorensen S. Estimated prevalence of mullerian duct anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 67 (1998) 441-445
22. Stray-Pedersen B., and Stray-Pedersen S. Etiologic factors and subsequent reproductive performance in 195 couples with a prior history of habitual abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 148 (1984) 140-146
23. Raga F., Bauset C., Remohl J., et al. Reproductive impact of congenital mullerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 12 (1997) 2277-2281
24. Golan A., Lnger R., Bukovsky I., et al. Congenital anomalies of the mullerian system. Fertil Steril 51 (1989) 747-755
25. Heinonen P.K., Saarikoski S., and Psysynen P. Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies: An evaluation of 182 cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 61 (1983) 157-162
26. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tube obstruction, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49 (1988) 944-955
27. Chavhan G.B., Hira P., Rathod K., et al. Female genital tuberculosis: Hysterosalpingographic appearances. BJR 77 (2004) 164-169