Sacred Value Measure (SVM): Construction and validation of an instrument to assess sacred values;Geschützte Werte Skala (GWS): Konstruktion und Validierung eines Messinstrumentes

Diagnostica

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 174-183

  Tanner, Carmen ^a   Ryf, Bettina ^a   Hanselmann, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Decision making; Protected values; Sacred values; Validity; Values

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650739700     PISSN: 00121924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924.55.3.174     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Andre, J. (1992). Blocked exchanges: A taxonomy. Ethics. 103, 29-47.
2. Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W. & Weiber, R. (2006). Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung (11. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.
3. Bandilla, W., Bosnjak, M. & Altdorfer, P. (2003). Survey Administration Effects? A Comparison of Web-Based and Traditional Written Self-Administered Surveys Using the ISSP Environment Module. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 2, 235-243.
4. Baron, J. & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1-16.
5. Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.). Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
6. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Feather, N. (1995). Values, valences, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 68, 1135-1151.
8. Foa, U. G., Converse, J., Jr., Törnblom. K. Y. & Foa, E. B. (Eds.). (1993). Resource theory: Explorations and applications. San Diego: Academic Press.
9. Graumann, C. F. & Willig, R. (1983). Wert, Wertung. Werterhaltung. In H. Thomae (Hrsg.), Theorien und Formen der Motivation (pp. 312-396). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
10. Gregory, R. & Lichtenstein, S. (1994). A hint of risk: Tradeoffs between quantitative and qualitative risk factors. Risk Analysis, 14, 199-206.
11. Hanselmann. M. & Tanner, C. (2008). Taboos and conflicts in decision making: Sacred values, decision difficulty, and emotions. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 51-63.
12. Hirsch Hadorn, G. (1999). Nachhaltige Entwicklung und der Wert der Natur. Gaia, 8, 269-274.
13. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt. Brace & World.
14. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
15. Hudson, D., Seah. L.-H., Hite, D. & Haab, T. (2004). Telephone presurveys, self-selection, and non-response bias to mail and Internet surveys in economic research. Applied Economic-Letters, 11, 237-240.
16. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Lichtenstein, S., Gregory, R. & Irwin, J. (2007). What's bad is easy: Taboo values, affect, and cognition. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 169-188.
18. MacGregor, D. & Slovic, P. (1986). Perceived acceptance of risk analysis as a decision-making approach. Risk Analysis. 6, 245-256.
19. McGraw, A. P. & Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Taboo Trade-offs, relational framing, and the acceptability of exchanges. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 2-15.
20. Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Pomerantz, E. M., Chaiken, S. & Tordesillas, R. S. (1995). Attitude strength and resistance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 408-419.
22. Ritov, I. & Baron, J. (1999). Protected values and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 79-94.
23. Rohan, M. M. (2000). A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 255-277.
24. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
25. Scholl-Schaaf, M. (1975). Werterhaltung und Wertsystem. Ein Plädoyer für die Verwendung des Wertkonzepts in der Sozialpsychologie. Grundmann: Bonn.
26. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). New York: Academic Press.
27. Skitka, L. J. (2002). Do the means always justify the ends, or do the ends sometimes justify the means? A value model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 588-597.
28. Skitka, L. J., Bauman. C. W. & Sargis, E. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 895-917.
29. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: A. Strahan & T. Cadell.
30. Tanner, C. (2008). Zur Rolle von Geschützten Werten bei Entscheidungen. In E. H. Witte (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie und Werte (Beiträge des 23. Hamburger Symposiums zur Methodologie der Sozialpsychologie, S. 172-188). Lengerich: Pabst.
31. Tanner, C. & Medin, D. L. (2004). Protected values: No omission bias and no framing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 185-191.
32. Taylor, P. W. (1981). The ethics of respect for nature. Environmental Ethics, 3, 197-218.
33. Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 320-324.
34. Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B. Lerner, J. S. & Green, M. C. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853-870.
35. Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.