Structural integrity of enamel: experimental and/modeling

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 529-533

  Xie, Z ^a,b   Swain, M V ^c   Hoffman, M J ^d  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Contact damage resistance; Crystal orientation angle; Stress strain behaviour; Structural integrity; Tooth enamel

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CARE; ELASTICITY; ENAMEL; HARDNESS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SHEAR STRENGTH; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

BICUSPID; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; HARDNESS; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SHEAR STRENGTH;

EID: 67650733831     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022034509337130     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Baldassarri M, Margolis HC, Beniash E (2008). Compositional determinants of mechanical properties of enamel. J Dent Res 87:645-649.
2. Chen H, Tang Z, Liu J, Sun K, Chang SR, Peters MC, et al. (2006). Acellular synthesis of a human enamel-like microstructure. Advanced Mater 18:1846-1851.
3. Daculsi G, Mentanteau J, Kerebel LM, Mitre D (1984). Length and shape of enamel crystals. Calcif Tissue Int 36:550-555.
4. Fan Y, Sun Z, Wang RZ, Abbott C, Moradian-Oldak J (2007). Enamel inspired nanocomposite fabrication through amelogenin supramolecu-lar assembly. Biomaterials 28:3034-3042.
5. Fantner GE, Hassenkam T, Kindt JS, Weaver JC, Birkedal H, Pechenik L, et al. (2005). Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture. Nat Mater 4: 612-616.
6. Hacker CH, Wagner WC, Razzoog ME (1996). An in vitro investigation of the wear of enamel on porcelain and gold in saliva. J Prosthet Dent 75:14-17.
7. Hayasaki H, Okamoto A, Iwase Y, Yamasaki Y, Nakata M (2004). Occlusal contact area of mandibular teeth during lateral excursion. Int J Prosthodont 17:72-76.
8. He LH, Swain MV (2007a). Contact induced deformation of enamel. Appl Phys Lett 90:171916.
9. He LH, Swain MV (2007b). Enamel-a "metallic-like" deformable biocom-posite. J Dent 35:431-437.
10. He LH, Swain MV (2007c). Nanoindentation derived stress-strain properties of dental materials. Dent Mater 23:814-821.
11. He LH, Fujisawa N, Swain MV (2006). Elastic modulus and stressstrain response of human enamel by nanoindentation. Biomaterials 27:4388-4398.
12. Hudson JD, Goldstein GR, Georgescu M (1995). Enamel wear caused by three different restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 74:647-654.
13. Imbeni V, Kruzic JJ, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Ritchie RO (2005). The dentin-enamel junction and the fracture of human teeth. Nat Mater 4:229-232.
14. Jones RM (1999). Mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edition, Philadelphia, PA: Taylor &Francis, Inc., pp. 74-85.
15. Liu B, Zhang LX, Gao HJ (2006). Poisson ratio can play a crucial role in mechanical properties of biocomposites. Mechanics of Materials 38:1128-1142.
16. Nanci A (2003). Ten Cate's oral histology: development, structure, and function. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Inc. (Elsevier Health Sciences).
17. Ramp MH, Suzuki S, Cox CF, Lacefield WR, Koth DL (1997). Evaluation of wear: enamel opposing three ceramic materials and a gold alloy. J Prosthet Dent 77:523-530.
18. Schneider GA, He LH, Swain MV (2008). Viscous flow model of creep in enamel. J Appl Phys 103:014701.
19. Shimizu D, Macho GA, Spears IR (2005). The effect of prism orientation and loading direction on contact stresses in prismatic enamel: implications for interpreting wear patterns. Am J Phys Anthropol 126:427-434.
20. Spears IR (1997). A three-dimensional finite element model of prismatic enamel: a re-appraisal of the data on the Young's modulus of enamel. J Dent Res 76:1690-1697.
21. Staines M, Robinson WH, Hood JAA (1981). Spherical indentation of tooth enamel. J Mater Sci 16:2551-2556.
22. Termine JD, Torchia DA, Conn KM (1979). Enamel matrix: structural proteins. J Dent Res 58(Spec Iss B):773-781.
23. Thompson JB, Kindt JH, Drake B, Hansma HG, Morse DE, Hansma PK (2001). Bone indentation recovery time correlates with bond reforming time. Nature 414:773-776.
24. Waltimo A, Könönen M (1995). Maximal bite force and its associations with signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorders in young Finnish non-patients. Acta Odontol Scand 53:254-258.
25. White SN, Luo W, Paine ML, Fong H, Sarikaya M, Snead ML (2001). Biological organization of hydroxyapatite crystallites into a fibrous continuum toughens and controls anisotropy in human enamel. J Dent Res 80:321-326.
26. Xie Z, Kilpatrick NM, Swain MV, Munroe P, Hoffman M (2008a). Transmission electron microscope characterisation of molar-incisor- hypomineralisation. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 19:3187-3192.
27. Xie Z, Swain M, Munroe P, Hoffman M (2008b). On the critical parameters that regulate the mechanical behaviour of tooth enamel. Biomaterials 29:2697-2703.
28. Xie ZH, Hoffman M, Munroe P, Bendavid A, Martin P (2008c). Deformation mechanisms of TiN multilayer coatings alternated by ductile or stiff interlayers. Acta Mater 56:852-861.
29. Xu HHK, Smith DT, Jahanmir S, Romberg E, Kelly JR, Thompson VP, et al. (1998). Indentation damage and mechanical properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 77:472-480.
30. Yamagishi K, Onuma K, Suzuki T, Okada F, Tagami J, Otsuki M, et al. (2005). A synthetic enamel for rapid tooth repair. Nature 433:819.
31. Zhou J, Hsiung LL (2006). Biomolecular origin of the rate-dependent deformation of prismatic enamel. Appl Phys Lett 89:051904.