Is text-to-speech synthesis ready for use in computer-assisted language learning?

Speech Communication

Volumn 51, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 906-919

  Handley, Zöe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CALL; Evaluation; Speech synthesis; TTS synthesis

Indexed keywords

CALL; COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING; EVALUATION; LANGUAGE LEARNING; ON-DEMAND; POTENTIAL BENEFITS; SPEECH MODELS; SPOKEN LANGUAGES; TEXT INPUT; TEXT TO SPEECH SYNTHESIS; TTS SYNTHESIS;

EDUCATION; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH SYNTHESIS;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 67650733073     PISSN: 01676393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2008.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Auralog, 2002. Talk to me: the conversation method (French). (Version 3.5) from Auralog .
2. Babel Technologies, 2003. BrightSpeech. Retrieved from .
3. Bailly, G., Campbell, N., Mobius, B., 2003. ISCA special session: hot topics in speech synthesis. In: Proceedings of the Eurospeech, Geneva, pp. 37-40.
4. Bennett, C., 2005. Large scale evaluation of corpus-based synthesizers: results and lessons from the blizzard challenge 2005. In: Proceedings of the INTERSPEECH, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 105-108.
5. Beutnagel, M., Conkie, A., Schroeter, J., Stylianou, Y., Syrdal, A., 1999. The AT&T next-gen TTS system. In: Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the ASA, EAA, and DAGA. Berlin, Germany.
6. Black, A., Lenzo, K., 2000. Limited domain synthesis. In: Proceedings of the ICSLP, Beijing, China.
7. Black, A., Taylor, P., 1994. CHATR: a generic speech synthesis system. In: Proceedings of the COLING 94, the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 983-986.
8. Black, A, Tokuda, K., 2005. The blizzard challenge - 2005: evaluating corpus-based speech synthesis on common datasets. In: Proceedings of the INTERSPEECH, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 77-80.
9. Campbell N., and Black A. Prosody and the selection of source units for concatenative synthesis. In: van Santen J., Sproat R., Olive J., and Hirschberg J. (Eds). Progress in Speech Synthesis (1997), Springer-Verlag, London 279-292
10. Campbell N., Hamza W., Höge H., Tao J., and Bailly G. Special section on expressive speech synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 14 4 (2006)
11. Chapelle C. Multimedia CALL: lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning and Technology 2 1 (1998) 22-34. Retrieved from:
12. Chapelle C. Innovative language learning: achieving the vision. ReCALL 23 10 (2001) 3-14
13. Chapelle C. Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition: Foundations for Teaching, Testing and Research (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
14. Cohen R. The use of a voice synthesizer in the discovery of the written language by young children. Computers in Educations. 21 1/2 (1993) 25-30
15. Conkie, A. (1999). Robust Unit Selection System for Speech Synthesis. In Procs. Joint meeting of ASA, EAA, and DAGA. Berlin. Germany.
16. de Pijper J. High-quality message-to-speech generation in a practical application. In: van Santen J., Sproat R., Olive J., and Hirschberg J. (Eds). Progress in Speech Synthesis (1997), Springer Verlag, London 575-588
17. de Saint-Exupéry A. Le Petit Prince (1999), Gallimard, Paris
18. Dutoit T. An Introduction to Text-to-Speech Synthesis (1997), Kluwer Academic Publishers, London
19. Edgington, M., 1997. Investigating the limitations of concatenative synthesis. In: Proceedings of the Eurospeech'97, Rhodes, Greece, pp. 1-4.
20. Egan B., and LaRocca S. Speech recognition in language learning: a must. Procs. InSTIL (2000), University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee, England 4-9
21. Ehsani B.K., and Knodt E. Speech technology in computer-aided language learning: strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm. Language Learning & Technology 2 1 (1998) 45-60. RetrievedJanuary31, 2005, from
22. ELSE (Evaluation in Language and Speech Engineering), 1999. A Blueprint for a General Infrastructure for Natural Language Processing Systems Evaluation using Semi-Automatic Quantitative Black Box Approach in a Multilingual Environment, Report No. D1.1.
23. Francis A., and Nusbaum H. Evaluating the quality of synthetic speech. In: Gardner-Bonneau D. (Ed). Human Factors and Voice Interactive Systems (1999), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 63-67
24. Hamel M.-J. Les outils de TALN dans SAFRAN [NLP tools in SAFRAN]. ReCALL 10 1 (1998) 79-85
25. Hamel, M.-J., 2003a. Re-using Natural Language Processing Tools in Computer Assisted Language Learning: The Experience of SAFRAN. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. UMIST, Manchester.
26. Hamel, M.-J., 2003b. FreeText: a "Smart" multimedia web-based computer assisted language learning environment for learners of French. In: Proceedings of the m-ICTE2003, Vol. III, Badajoz, Spain, pp. 1661-1665.
27. Handley, Z., 2006. Evaluating Text-To-Speech (TTS) Synthesis for use in Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL). Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. The University of Manchester.
28. Handley Z., and Hamel M.-J. Establishing a methodology for benchmarking speech synthesis for computer-assisted language learning (CALL). Language Learning and Technology Journal 9 3 (2005) 99-119. Retrieved from:
29. Henton C. Challenges and rewards in using parametric or concatenative speech synthesis. International Journal of Speech Technology 5 (2002) 117-131
30. Hincks R. Speech synthesis for teaching lexical stress. TMH-QPSR 44 (2002) 153-165
31. Huang X., Acero X., and Hon H.-W. Spoken Language Processing: A Guide to Theory, Algorithm, and System Development (2001), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
32. Johnson, W., Narayanan, S., Whitney, R., Das, R., Bulut, M., LaBore, C., 2002. Limited domain synthesis of expressive military speech for animated characters. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Denver, Colorado, USA.
33. Keller E., and Zellner-Keller B. Speech synthesis in language learning: challenges and opportunities. Procs. InSTIL (2000), University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee, England 109-116
34. Mercier G., Guyomard M., Siroux J., Bramoullé A., Gourmelon H., Guillou A., and Lavannant P. Courseware for breton spelling pronunciation and intonation learning. Procs. InSTIL (2000), University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee, England 145-148
35. Multitel, 2005. eLite Documentation. Retrieved from .
36. Pisoni D. Some measures of intelligibility and comprehension. In: Allen J., Hunnicutt M.S., Klatt D., Armstrong R.C., and Pisoni D.B. (Eds). From Text to Speech: The MITalk System (1978/9), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 151-171 1987
37. Polkosky M., and Lewis J. Expanding the MOS: development and psychometric evaluation of the MOS-R and MOS-X. International Journal of Speech Technology 6 (2003) 161-182
38. Raux, A., Eskenazi, M., 2004. Using task-oriented spoken dialogues for language learning: Potential, practical application and challenges. In: Delmonte, R., Delcloque, P., Tonelli, S.(Eds.), Proceedings of the InSTIL/ICALL 2004 Symposium, Venice, Italy, pp. 147-150.
39. Rodman R. Computer Speech Technology (1999), Artech House, London
40. Santiago-Oriola, C., 1999. Vocal synthesis in a computerized dictation exercise. In: Proceedings of EUROSPEECH'99, Vol. 1, Budapest, pp. 191-194.
41. Schmidt-Nielsen A. Intelligibility and acceptability testing for speech technology. In: Syrdal A., Bennett R., and Greenspan S. (Eds). Applied Speech Technology (1995), CRC, Boca Raton 195-231
42. Schroeter, J., Conkie, A., Syrdal, A., Beutnagel, M., Juka, M., Strom, V., Kim, M.-J., Kang, H.-G., Kapllow, D., 2002. A perspective on the next challenges for TTS research. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2002 Workshop on Speech Synthesis, Santa Monica, California, pp. 211-214.
43. Seneff, S., Wang, C., Zhang, J., 2004. Spoken conversational interaction for language learning. In: Proceedings of the InSTIL/ICALL 2004 - NLP and Speech Technologies in Language Learning Systems, Venice, Italy, pp. 151-154.
44. Sherwood B. Speech synthesis applied to language teaching. Studies in Language Learning. 3 (1981) 175-181
45. Sobkowiak W. Speech in EFL CALL. In: Cameron K. (Ed). Multimedia CALL: Theory and Practice (1998), Elm Bank, Exeter
46. Sparck Jones K., and Galliers J.R. Evaluating Natural Language Processing Systems: An Analysis and Review (1996), Springer, London
47. Stevens V. A direction for CALL: from behaviouristic to humanistic courseware. In: Pennington M. (Ed). Teaching Languages With Computers: The Sate of the Art (1989), Athelstan, La Jolla, CA 31-43
48. Stratil M., Burkhardt D., Jarratt P., and Yandle J. Computer-aided language learning with speech synthesis: user reactions. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 24 4 (1987) 309-316
49. Stratil M., Weston G., and Burkhardt D. Exploration of foreign language speech synthesis. Literary and Linguistic Computing 2 2 (1987) 116-119
50. TMA Associates, 2003. Nuance: US English. Retrieved from .
51. van Bezooijen R., and van Heuven V. Assessment of synthesis systems. In: Gibbon D., Moore R., and Winski R. (Eds). Handbook of Standards and Resources for Spoke Language Systems (1997), Walter de Gruyter Publishers, New York 481-563