Are there sex-related differences in responses to repetitive olfactory/trigeminal stimuli?

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Volumn 266, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1323-1326

  Scheibe, M ^a   Opatz, O ^a,b   Hummel, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DRESDEN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b Trauma Center   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Gender; Habituation; Irritation; Olfaction; Smell

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; PHENETHYL ALCOHOL;

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OLFACTOMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMELLING; TRIGEMINAL NERVE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CARBON DIOXIDE; DISINFECTANTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OLFACTORY NERVE; PHENYLETHYL ALCOHOL; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SEX FACTORS; SMELL; STIMULATION, CHEMICAL; TRIGEMINAL NERVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67650727058     PISSN: 09374477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0860-0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. E Bailey E Powell 1884 Preliminary notes on the delicacy of special senses NY Med 40 325
2. E Becker T Hummel E Piel E Pauli G Kobal M Hautzinger 1993 Olfactory event-related potentials in psychosis-prone subjects Int J Psychol 15 51 58 (Pubitemid 23229822)
3. WS Cain 1977 Bilateral interaction in olfaction Nature 268 50 53 10.1038/268050a0
4. WS Cain JC Stevens CM Nickou A Giles I Johnston MR Garcia-Medina 1995 Life-span development of odor identification, learning, and olfactory sensitivity Perception 24 1457 1472 10.1068/p241457
5. P Dalton D Dilks T Hummel 2006 Effects of long-term exposure to volatile irritants on sensory thresholds, negative mucosal potentials, and event-related potentials Behav Neurosci 120 180 187 10.1037/0735-7044.120.1.180
6. P Dalton T Hummel 2000 Chemosensory function and response in idiopathic environmental intolerance Occup Med 15 539 556
7. RL Doty P Shaman M Dann 1984 Development of the University of Pennsylvania smell identification test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function Physiol Behav 32 489 502 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90269-5
8. CS Elsberg ED Brewer I Levy 1935 The sense of smell. IV. Concerning conditions which may temporarily alter normal olfactory acuity Bull Neurol Inst NY 4 31 34
9. T Hummel M Gruber E Pauli G Kobal 1994 Event-related potentials in response to repetitive painful stimulation Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92 426 432 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90020-5
10. T Hummel M Knecht G Kobal 1996 Peripherally obtained electrophysiological responses to olfactory stimulation in man: electro-olfactograms exhibit a smaller degree of desensitization compared with subjective intensity estimates Brain Res 717 160 164 10.1016/0006-8993(96)00094-7
11. T Hummel G Kobal 1999 Chemosensory event-related potentials to trigeminal stimuli change in relation to the interval between repetitive stimulation of the nasal mucosa Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 256 16 21 10.1007/s004050050115
12. Hummel T, Kobal G (2001) Olfactory event-related potentials. In: Simon SA, Nicolelis MAL (eds) Methods and frontiers in chemosensory research. CRC press, Boca Raton, pp 429-464
13. T Hummel R von Mering R Huch N Kolble 2002 Olfactory modulation of nausea during early pregnancy? BJOG 109 1394 1397 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2002.02287.x
14. Kobal G (1981) Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen des menschlichen Geruchssinns. Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart
15. G Kobal L Klimek M Wolfensberger H Gudziol A Temmel CM Owen H Seeber E Pauli T Hummel 2000 Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257 205 211 10.1007/s004050050223
16. HS Koelega EP Köster 1974 Some experiments on sex differences in odor perception Ann N Y Acad Sci 237 234 246 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb49859.x
17. EP Köster 1965 Adaptation, recovery and specificity of olfactory receptors Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 86 880 894
18. Köster EP, de Wijk RA (1991) Olfactory adaptation. In: Laing DG, Doty RL, Breipohl W (eds) The human sense of smell. Springer, Berlin, pp 199-215
19. JN Lundstrom J Frasnelli M Larsson T Hummel 2005 Sex differentiated responses to intranasal trigeminal stimuli Int J Psychophysiol 57 181 186 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.01.003
20. JDJ Pierce CJ Wysocki EV Aronov JB Webb RM Boden 1996 The role of perceptual and structural similarity in cross-adaptation Chem Senses 21 223 237 10.1093/chemse/21.2.223
21. A Poellinger R Thomas P Lio A Lee N Makris BR Rosen KK Kwong 2001 Activation and habituation in olfaction-an fMRI study Neuroimage 13 547 560 10.1006/nimg.2000.0713
22. RA Schneider S Wolf 1955 Olfactory perception thresholds for citral utilizing a new type olfactorium J Appl Physiol 8 337 342
23. A Soiffer RL Doty T Hummel 1998 Lateralized vs. bilateral measurement of olfactory thresholds: comparison of two methods Chem Senses 22 799
24. BA Stuck S Frey C Freiburg K Hörmann T Zahnert T Hummel 2006 Chemosensory event-related potentials in relation to side of stimulation, age, sex, and stimulus concentration Clin Neurophysiol 117 1367 1375 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.03.004
25. CJ Wysocki AN Gilbert 1989 National Geographic Smell Survey: effects of age are heterogenous Ann N Y Scad Sci 26 12 2
26. DM Yousem J Maldjian F Siddiqi T Hummel D Alsop RJ Geckle WB Bilker RL Doty 1998 Gender-effects on odor-stimulated functional magnetic resonance imaging Brain Res 818 480 487 10.1016/S0006-8993(98)01276-1