Attachment and growth behaviour of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium and zirconia ceramic surfaces

Biomedical Materials

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Pae, Ahran ^a   Lee, Heesu ^b   Kim, Hyeong Seob ^a   Kwon, Yong Dae ^a   Woo, Yi Hyung ^a  

^a Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^b Gangneung Wonju National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL CULTURE; CELL MEMBRANES; CELL PROLIFERATION; CERAMIC MATERIALS; FIBROBLASTS; GENE EXPRESSION; TISSUE; TITANIUM; YTTRIUM; YTTRIUM ALLOYS;

BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; CELL MORPHOLOGY; GENETIC EFFECTS; GROWTH BEHAVIOUR; HUMAN GINGIVAL FIBROBLASTS; INTEGRIN; LAMININ; MACHINED SURFACE; MRNA EXPRESSION; MTT ASSAYS; OPTICAL DENSITY VALUES; PROLIFERATION ACTIVITY; SEM; SEM IMAGE; SMOOTH SURFACE; TETRAGONAL ZIRCONIA POLYCRYSTAL; TITANIUM DISCS; TITANIUM SURFACES; ZIRCONIA CERAMIC;

ZIRCONIA;

3 (4,5 DIMETHYL 2 THIAZOLYL) 2,5 DIPHENYLTETRAZOLIUM BROMIDE; BETA1 INTEGRIN; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; COLLAGEN TYPE 2; FIBRONECTIN; LAMININ; MESSENGER RNA; TITANIUM; YTTRIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE; BIOMATERIAL; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL ASSAY; CELL CULTURE; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL; FIBROBLAST; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GINGIVA; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; OPTICAL DENSITY; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; METABOLISM; TIME;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; CERAMICS; FIBROBLASTS; GINGIVA; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 67650708735     PISSN: 17486041     EISSN: 1748605X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/4/2/025005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kasemo B and Lausmaa J 1988 Biomaterial and implant surfaces: a surface science approach Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 3 247-59
2. Brunette D M 1996 Effects of surface topography of implant materials on cell behavior in vitro and in vivo Nanofabrication and Biosystems ed H C Hoch (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press)
3. 2 particles. A scanning electron microscopic and histomorphometric analysis Clin. Oral Implants Res. 9 195-207
4. Yoshinari M, Matsuzaka K, Inoue T, Oda Y and Shimono M 2003 Effects of multigrooved surfaces on fibroblasts behavior J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 65 A 359-68
5. 4 surfaces on osteoblastic cell behavior Biomaterials 21 1567-77
6. 72 osteoblast-like cells cultured on zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies Clin. Oral Implants Res. 18 53-9
7. Heydecke G, Kohal R and Galser R 1999 Optimal esthetics in single-tooth replacement with the re-implant system: a case report Int. J. Prosthodont. 12 184-9
8. Piconi C and Maccauro G 1999 Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial Biomaterials 20 1-25
9. Garvie R C, Hannink R H and R T 1975 Ceramic steel? Nature 258 703-4
10. Manicone P F, Rossi Iommetti P and Raffaelli L 2007 An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications J. Dent. 35 819-26
11. Manicone P F, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L, Paolantonio M, Rossi G, Berardi D and Perfetti G 2007 Biological considerations on the use of zirconia for dental devices Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 20 ((Suppl. 1)) 9-12
12. Ichikawa Y, Akagawa Y, Nikai H and Tsuru H 1992 Tissue compatibility and stability of a new zirconia ceramic in vivo J. Prosthet. Dent. 68 322-6
13. Josset Y, Oum'Hamed Z, Zarrinpour A, Lorenzato M, Adnet J J and Laurent Maquin D 1999 In vitro reactions of human osteoblasts in culture with zirconia and alumina ceramics J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 47 481-93
14. Scarano A, Piatelli M, Caputi S, Favero G A and Piatelli A 2004 Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study J. Periodontol. 75 292-6
15. Rimondini L, Cerroni L, Carrassi A and Torricelli P 2002 Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 17 793-8
16. Degidi M, Artese L, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Gehrke P and Piatelli A 2006 Inflammatory infiltrate, microvessel density, nitric oxide synthase expression, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, and proliferative activity in peri-implant soft tissues around titanium and zirconium oxide healing caps J. Periodontol. 77 73-80
17. Lalor P A, Revell P A, Gray A B, Wright S, Railton G T and Freeman M A 1991 Sensitivity to titanium. A cause of implant failure? J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 73 25-8
18. Yamauchi R, Morita A and Tsuji T 2000 Pacemaker dermatitis from titanium Contact Dermatitis 42 52-3
19. Weiss P 1945 Experiments on cell and axon orientation in vitro, the role of colloidal exudates in tissue organization J. Exp. Zool. 100 353-86
20. Matsuzaka K, Walboomers X F, Yoshinari M, Inoue T and Jansen J A 2003 The attachment and growth behavior of osteoblast-like cells on microtextured surfaces Biomaterials 24 2711-9
21. Larelle C L B 1981 Mucosal seal around endosseous dental implants J. Oral Implantol. 9 357-71
22. Walboomers X F and Jansen J A 2001 Cell and tissue behavior of micro-grooved surfaces Odontology 89 2-11
23. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz P O and Lindhe J 1998 The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study on dogs J. Clin. Periodontol. 25 721-7
24. Raffaelli L, Rossi Iommetti P, Piccioni E, Toesca A, Serini S, Resci F, Missori M, De Spirito M, Manicone P F and Calviello G 2008 Growth, viability, adhesion potential, and fibronectin expression in fibroblasts cultured on zirconia or feldspathic ceramics in vitro J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 86 959-68
25. Hormia M, Knnen M, Kivilahti J and Virtanen I 1991 Immunolocalization of proteins specific for adherents junctions in human gingival epithelial cells grown on differently processed titanium surfaces J. Periodontol. Res. 26 491-7
26. Guy S C, McQuade M J, Scheidt M J, McPherson J C, Rossmann J A and Van Dyke T E 1993 In vitro study of attachment of human gingival fibroblasts to endosseous implant materials J. Periodontol. 64 542-6
27. Cochran D L, Simpson J, Weber H P and Buser D 1988 Attachment and growth of periodontal cells on smooth and rough titanium Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 3 21-4
28. Bowers K T, Keller J C, Randolph B A, Wick D G and Michaels C M 1992 Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 7 302-10
29. 2-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2 77-84
30. Zitzmann N U, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T and Lindhe J 2002 Soft tissue reactions of plaque formation at implant abutments with different surface topography. An experimental study in dogs J. Clin. Periodontol. 29 456-61
31. Hunter A, Archer C W, Walker P S and Blunn G W 1995 Attachments and proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on biomaterials for orthopedic use Biomaterials 16 287-95
32. Ismail M, Rohanizadeh R, Atwa S, Mason R, Ruys A, Martin P and Bendavid A 2007 The influence of surface chemistry and topography on the contact guidance of MG63 osteoblast cells J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 18 705-14
33. Metlapally R, Jobling A I, Gentle A and McBrien N A 2006 Characterization of the integrin receptor subunit profile in the mammalian sclera Mol. Vis. 12 725-34
34. Inoue T, Cox J E, Pilliar R M and Melcher A H 1987 Effect of surface geometry of smooth and porous-coated titanium alloy on the orientation of fibroblasts in vitro J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 21 107-26
35. Knnen M, Hormia M, Kivilahti J, Hautaniemi J and Thesleff I 1992 Effect of surface processing on the attachment, orientation and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 26 1325-41
36. Yildrim M, Edelhoff D, Hanisch O and Spiekermann H 2000 Ceramic abutments-a new era in achieving optimal esthetics in implant dentistry Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 20 81-91
37. Gahert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H and Erhardt W 2007 Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs Clin. Oral Implants Res. 18 662-8