A component framework for dynamic reconfiguration of distributed systems

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2370, Issue , 2002, Pages 82-96

  Chen, Xuejun ^a,b   Simons, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^b DAIMLER AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC MODELS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COMMUNICATION MECHANISMS; COMPONENT FRAMEWORK; CURRENT COMPONENT; DISTRIBUTED COMPONENTS; DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS; DYNAMIC RE-CONFIGURATION; TARGET COMPONENT; WIRED AND WIRELESS;

DYNAMICS;

EID: 67650690747     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45440-3_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Bachman, F. et al. Technical Concepts of Component-Based Software Engineering. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2000-TR-008, May 2000.
2. Bidan, Ch., Issarny, V., Saridakis, T., and Zarras, A. A Dynamic Reconfiguration Service for CORBA. In: Proceedings of the fourth International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems, pages 35-42, Maryland, 1998.
3. Holder, O., Ben-Shaul, I. and Gazit, H. Dynamic Layout of Distributed Applications in FarGo. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’99), Los Angeles, CA, USA, pages 163-173, 1999.
4. Holder, O., Ben-Shaul, I. and Gazit, H. System Support for Dynamic Layout of Distributed Applications. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’99), Austin, TX, USA, pages 403-411, 1999.
5. Kon, F. Automatic Configuration of Component-based Distributed Systems. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2000.
6. Kon, F. and Campbell, R. Dependence Management in Component-Based Distributed Systems. IEEE Concurrency, 8(1), pp. 26-36, January-March, 2000.
7. Kono, K. and Masuda, T. Efficient RMI: Dynamic Specialization of Object Serialization. The 20th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Taiwan, April, 2000.
8. Kramer, J. and Magee, J. The Evolving Philosophers Problem: Dynamic Change Management. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-16, 11, pages 1293-1306, 1990.
9. Microsoft, COM, http://www.microsoft.com/com.
10. Milojicic, D. Middleware’s role, today and tomorrow. IEEE Concurrency, pages 70-80, April-June 1999.
11. Muller, G., Marlet, R., Pu C., and Goel A. Fast, optimized Sun RPC using automatic program specialization. In Proc. of IEEE 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 240-249, 1998.
12. Nester, Ch., Philippsen, M., and Haumacher, B. A More Efficient RM for Java. ACM Java’99, pp.152-159, San Francisco, USA, 1999.
13. ObjectSpace. Voyager, http:www.objectspace.com, 2000.
14. OMG. CORBA, Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org, 1997
15. OMG. CORBA Component Model, Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org, 2000.
16. OSGi: Open Services Gateway Initiative. http://www.osgi.org, 2001.
17. Oueichek, I. and Rousset de P., S. Dynamic Configuration Management in the Guide Object-Oriented Distributed. In: Proceedings of the third International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems, pages 28-35, Maryland, 1996
18. Rosenberry, W., Kenney, D., and Fischer, G. Understanding DCE, O’Reilly&Associates, Sebastopol, Calif., 1992.
19. Silva M., Atokinson M., and Black A. Semantics for parameter passing in a type-complete persistent RPC. In Proc. IEEE 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 411-418, 1996.
20. Sun Microsystems. Enterprise JavaBeans, http://java.sun.com/products/ejb/index.html, 1999.
21. Sun Microsystems. Remote Method Invocation, http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/rmi/index.html, 1999.
22. Szyperski, C. Component Software - Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. Addison-Wesley / ACM Press, 1998.
23. Warren, I. and Sommerville, I. A Model for Dynamic Configuration which Preserves Application Integrity. In: Proceedings of the third International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems, pages 28-35, Maryland, 1996