A comprehensive analysis of the structure-function relationship in proteins based on local structure similarity

PLoS ONE

Volumn 4, Issue 7, 2009, Pages

  Hvidsten, Torgeir R ^a,d   Lægreid, Astrid ^b   Kryshtafovych, Andriy ^c   Anderson, Gunnar ^a,e   Fidelis, Krzysztof ^c   Komorowski, Jan ^a,f  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e NATIONAL VETERINARY INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINOTRANSFERASE; AMYLASE; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; GLUTATHIONE TRANSFERASE; LYASE; METALLOPROTEINASE; OXIDOREDUCTASE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN DISULFIDE REDUCTASE (GLUTATHIONE); THROMBIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL GENOMICS; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOCATALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR GENETICS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOCATALYSIS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEINS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 67650669274     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006266     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-3402.
2. Kinoshita K, Nakamura H (2003) Protein informatics towards function identification. Curr Opin Struct Biol 13: 396-400.
3. Skolnick J, Fetrow JS (2000) From genes to protein structure and function: novel applications of computational approaches in the genomic era. Trends Biotechnol 18: 34-39.
4. Chandonia JM, Brenner SE (2006) The impact of structural genomics: expectations and outcomes. Science 311: 347-351.
5. Baker D, Sali A (2001) Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294: 93-96.
6. Kopp J, Bordoli L, Battey JN, Kiefer F, Schwede T (2007) Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template-based modeling targets. Proteins 69 Suppl 8: 38-56.
7. Zhang C, Kim SH (2003) Overview of structural genomics: from structure to function. Curr Opin Chem Biol 7: 28-32.
8. Murzin AG, Patthy L (1999) Sequences and topology: From sequence to structure to function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 9: 359-362.
9. Orengo CA, Todd AE, Thornton JM (1999) From protein structure to function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 9: 374-382.
10. Thornton JM, Todd AE, Milburn D, Borkakoti N, Orengo CA (2000) From structure to function: approaches and limitations. Nat Struct Biol 7 Suppl: 991-994.
11. Ouzounis CA, Coulson RM, Enright AJ, Kunin V, Pereira-Leal JB (2003) Classification schemes for protein structure and function. Nat Rev Genet 4: 508-519.
12. Lee D, Redfern O, Orengo C (2007) Predicting protein function from sequence and structure. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 995-1005.
13. Shakhnovich BE, Dokholyan NV, DeLisi C, Shakhnovich EI (2003) Functional fingerprints of folds: evidence for correlated structure-function evolution. J Mol Biol 326: 1-9.
14. Hegyi H, Gerstein M (1999) The relationship between protein structure and function: a comprehensive survey with application to the yeast genome. J Mol Biol 288: 147-164.
15. Pazos F, Sternberg MJ (2004) Automated prediction of protein function and detection of functional sites from structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 14754-14759.
16. Di Gennaro JA, Siew N, Hoffman BT, Zhang L, Skolnick J, et al. (2001) Enhanced functional annotation of protein sequences via the use of structural descriptors. J Struct Biol 134: 232-245.
17. Kasuya A, Thornton JM (1999) Three-dimensional structure analysis of PROSITE patterns. J Mol Biol 286: 1673-1691.
18. Jonassen I, Eidhammer I, Taylor WR (1999) Discovery of local packing motifs in protein structures. Proteins 34: 206-219.
19. Russell RB (1998) Detection of protein three-dimensional side-chain patterns: new examples of convergent evolution. J Mol Biol 279: 1211-1227.
20. Ferre F, Ausiello G, Zanzoni A, Helmer-Citterich M (2004) SURFACE: a database of protein surface regions for functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D240-244.
21. Polacco BJ, Babbitt PC (2006) Automated discovery of 3D motifs for protein function annotation. Bioinformatics 22: 723-730.
22. Laskowski RA, Watson JD, Thornton JM (2005) ProFunc: a server for predicting protein function from 3D structure. Nucleic Acids Res 33: W89-93.
23. Pal D, Eisenberg D (2005) Inference of protein function from protein structure. Structure 13: 121-130.
24. Watson JD, Sanderson S, Ezersky A, Savchenko A, Edwards A, et al. (2007) Towards fully automated structure-based function prediction in structural genomics: a case study. J Mol Biol 367: 1511-1522.
25. Hvidsten TR, Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K (2009) Local descriptors of protein structure: A systematic analysis of the sequence-structure relationship in proteins using short- and long-range interactions. Proteins 75: 870-884.
26. Hvidsten TR, Kryshtafovych A, Komorowski J, Fidelis K (2003) A novel approach to fold recognition using sequence-derived properties from sets of structurally similar local fragments of proteins. Bioinformatics 19 Suppl 2: II81-II91.
27. Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets: theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Theory and decision library Series D, System theory, knowledge engineering, and problem solving. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp 229.
28. Komorowski J, Øhrn A, Skowron A (2002) The ROSETTA Rough Set Software System. In: Klösgen W, Zytkow J, eds. Handbook of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Oxford University Press. pp 554-559.
29. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235-242.
30. Brenner SE, Koehl P, Levitt M (2000) The ASTRAL compendium for protein structure and sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 254-256.
31. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25: 25-29.
32. Camon E, Magrane M, Barrell D, Binns D, Fleischmann W, et al. (2003) The Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) project: implementation of GO in SWISSPROT, TrEMBL, and InterPro. Genome Res 13: 662-672.
33. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, et al. (1997) CATH-a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5: 1093-1108.
34. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143: 29-36.
35. Lægreid A, Hvidsten TR, Midelfart H, Komorowski J, Sandvik AK (2003) Predicting gene ontology biological process from temporal gene expression patterns. Genome Res 13: 965-979.
36. Eisenmesser EZ, Millet O, Labeikovsky W, Korzhnev DM, Wolf-Watz M, et al. (2005) Intrinsic dynamics of an enzyme underlies catalysis. Nature 438: 117-121.
37. Dunker AK, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Iakoucheva LM, Obradovic Z (2002) Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry 41: 6573-6582.
38. Lobley A, Swindells MB, Orengo CA, Jones DT (2007) Inferring function using patterns of native disorder in proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 3: e162.
39. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the False Discovery Rate: a Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 57: 289-300.
40. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T (1999) Docking of hydrophobic ligands with interaction-based matching algorithms. Bioinformatics 15: 243-250.
41. Hvidsten TR, Lægreid A, Komorowski J (2003) Learning rule-based models of biological process from gene expression time profiles using gene ontology. Bioinformatics 19: 1116-1123.
42. Holte RC (1993) Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets. Machine learning 11: 63-91.