Optimal interval for major maintenance actions in electricity distribution networks

International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems

Volumn 31, Issue 7-8, 2009, Pages 396-401

  Louit, Darko ^a   Pascual, Rodrigo ^a   Banjevic, Dragan ^b  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Asset management; Electricity network; Major maintenance actions

Indexed keywords

BEFORE AND AFTER; ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; ELECTRICITY NETWORK; ENERGY NETWORKS; FAILURE INTENSITY; FAILURE PROCESS; LONG TERM; MAINTENANCE ACTION; MAJOR MAINTENANCE ACTIONS; MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT; MODEL-BASED; MONOTONIC TREND; RELATIVE TIME; SEQUENTIAL EXECUTION; SIMPLE MODEL; TREE TRIMMINGS;

ASSET MANAGEMENT; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER NETWORKS; DISTRIBUTION OF GOODS; ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; NETWORK MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION; TIME MEASUREMENT;

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE;

EID: 67650632800     PISSN: 01420615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Barlow R.E., and Hunter L.C. Optimum preventive maintenance policies. Operat Res 8 (1960) 90-100
2. Baker R.D. Calculating the expected failure rate of complex equipment subject to hazardous repair. Int J Product Econ 67 (2000) 53-61
3. Billinton R., and Zhang W. Cost related reliability evaluation of bulk power systems. Electr Power Energ Syst 23 (2001) 99-112
4. Coetzee JL. Reliability degradation and the equipment replacement problem. ICOMS-96, paper 21; 1996.
5. Ebeling C.E. An introduction to reliability and maintainability engineering (1997), McGraw-Hill
6. Guobing S., Jiale S., and Yaozhong G. An accurate fault location algorithm for parallel transmission lines using one-terminal data. Electr Power Energ Syst 31 (2009) 124-129
7. Jardine A.K.S., and Tsang A. Maintenance, replacement and reliability (2006), Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton
8. Koonce A.M., Apostolakis G.E., and Cook B.K. Bulk power risk analysis: Ranking infrastructure elements according to their risk significance. Electr Power Energ Syst 30 (2008) 169-183
9. Kumar U., Klefsjö B., and Granholm S. Reliability investigation for a fleet of load haul dump machines in a Swedish mine. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 26 (1989) 341-361
10. Pascual R, Del Castillo G, Louit D, Knights P. Business-oriented prioritization: A novel graphical technique. Reliab Eng Syst Safety, in press.
11. Pulcini G. Modeling the failure data of a repairable equipment with bathtub type failure intensity. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 71 (2001) 209-218
12. Tatiésé T.T., Villeneuve P., Ndong E.P., and Kenfack F. Interruption modelling in medium voltage electrical networks. Electr Power Energ Syst 24 (2002) 859-865
13. Scarf P.A., Dwight R., and Al-Musrati A. On reliability criteria and the implied cost of failure for a maintained component. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 89 (2005) 199-207
14. Sherwin D.J. A simple general model for echelon overhaul and repair. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 51 (1996) 283-293
15. Sittithumwat A., Soudi F., and Tomsovic A. Optimal allocation of distribution maintenance resources with limited information. Electr Power Syst Res 68 (2004) 208-220
16. Su C.L., and Teng J.H. Outage costs quantification for benefit-cost analysis of distribution automation systems. Electr Power Energ Syst 29 (2007) 767-774
17. US-Canada. Final report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and recommendations. US-Canada power system outage task force, Governments of the US and Canada; April 2004.