The publication activity of Region Västra Götaland: A bibliometric study of an administrative and political Swedish region during the period 1998-2006

Information Research

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Jarneving, Bo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BORÅS   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650599557     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aksnes, D. W. & Sivertsen, G. (2004). The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators. Scientometrics, 59(2), 213-224
2. Altvater-Mackensen, N., Balicki, G., Bestakowa, L., Bocatius, B, Braun, J., Brehmer, L. and others. (2005). Science and technology in the region: the output of regional science and technology, its strengths and its leading institutions. Scientometrics, 63(3), 463-529
3. Bondemark, L. & Lilja-Karlander L. (2004). A systematic review of Swedish research in orthodontics during the past decade. ACTA Odontologica Scandinavica, 62(1),46-50
4. Chalmers University of Technology. (2009). Research. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology. Retrieved 18 February, 2009 from http://www.chalmers.se/en/sections/research (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5efxZ5pGq)
5. European Commission. (2003). Appendix: Extended technical annex to chapter 5. In Third European Report on Science & Technology Indicators. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
6. Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. Oxford: Routledge.
7. Glänzel, W. (1996). The need for standards in bibliometric research and technology. Scientometrics, 35(2), 167-176
8. Glänzel, W. (2000). Science in Scandinavia: a bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 48(2), 121-150
9. Glänzel, W., Danell, R. & Persson, O. (2003). The decline in Swedish neuroscience: decomposing a bibliometric national science indicator. Scientometrics, 57(2), 197-213
10. Glänzel, W. & Schubert, A. (2004). Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel and U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257-276.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. & Czerwon, H.J. (1999). An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in multidisciplinary and general journals using reference analysis. Scientometrics, 44(3), 427-439
12. Gauffriau, M., Olesen Larsen, P., Maye, I., Roulin-Perriard, A. & Von Ins, M. (2007). Publication, cooperation and productivity measures in scientific research. Scientometrics, 73(2), 175-214
13. Hansen, H.K., Vang, J. & Asheim, B.T. (2005). The creative class and regional growth: towards a knowledge based approach. Paper presented at the Regional Growth Agendas International Conference, University of Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark 28th-31st May 2005. Seaford, UK: Regional Studies Association. Retrieved 18 February, 2009 from http://www.regional-studies-assoc.ac.uk/events/aalborg05/hansen.pdf (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5efyBL1T3)
14. Hicks, D. & Katz, J.S. (1996). Science policy for a highly collaborative science system. Science and Public Policy, 23(1), 39-44
15. Kyvik, S. (2003). Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000. Scientometrics, 58(1), 35-48
16. Marx, W., Schier, H. & Wanitschek, M. (2001). Citation analysis using online databases: feasibilities and shortcomings. Scientometrics, 52(1), 59-82
17. Melin, G. & Persson, O. (1998). Hotel cosmopolitan: a bibliometric study of collaboration at some European universities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(1), 43-48
18. Moed, H.F. (2002). The impact factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits: towards a critical, informative, accurate and policy-relevant bibliometrics. Nature, 415(6873), 731-732
19. Moed, H.F., de Bruin, R.E. & van Leeuwen, T.N. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33(3), 381-422
20. National Science Foundation (2007). Expanding and fixed journal sets. In Changing U.S. output of scientific articles: 1988-2003. Retrieved 18 February, 2009 from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf07320/content.cfm?pub_id=1878&id=3#expanding (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5efyOACRg)
21. Persson, O. & Danell, R. (2004). Decomposing national trends in activity and impact. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. (pp. 515-528.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
22. Rousseau, R. & Van Hecke, P. (1999). Measuring biodiversity. Acta Biotheoretica, 47(1), 1-5
23. Rousseau, R. (2000). Concentration and evenness measures as macro-level scientometric indicators. Paper presented at the Second International Seminar on Quantitative Evaluation of Research Performance. Shanghai, 23-25 October, 2000.
24. Sandström, A., Pettersson, I.& Nilsson, A. (2000). Knowledge production and knowledge flows in the Swedish biotechnology innovation system. Scientometrics, 48(2), 179-201
25. Schubert, A., Glänzel, W. & Braun, T. (1988). Against absolute methods: Relative scientometric indicators and relational charts. In A.J.F. van Raan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology (pp. 137-176.). Amsterdam: North Holland.
26. Schubert, A., Glänzel, W. & Braun, T. (1989). Scientometric datafiles. Scientometrics, 16(1-6), 1-478
27. Schubert, A. & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9(5/6), 281-291
28. Thomson Reuters. (2009). Product information. Retrieved 18 February, 2009 from http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/scientific/Science_Citation_Index_Expanded (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5eg2edNLg)
29. Tsipouri, L. (1999). Evaluation at the regional level - science and technology in structural funds. Scientometrics, 45(3), 509-515
30. Tuzi, F. (2005). The scientific specialization of the Italian regions. Scientometrics, 62(1), 87-111
31. University of Gothenburg. (2009). Leading edge research at the Sahlgrenska Academy. Retrieved February, 2009 from http://www.sahlgrenska.gu.se/english/research/ (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5eg4NfGzP)
32. van Raan, A.F.J. (2004). Measuring science. In H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 19-50.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33. Weingart, P., Sehringer, R. & Winterhager, M. (1988). Bibliometric indicators for assessing strengths and weaknesses of West German science. In A.J.F. van Raan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology. (pp. 391-430.). Amsterdam: North Holland