Developing Core Sets for persons following amputation based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a way to specify functioning

Prosthetics and Orthotics International

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 117-129

  Kohler, Friedbert ^a   Cieza, Alarcos ^b   Stucki, Gerold ^b,c   Geertzen, Jan ^d   Burger, Helena ^e   Dillon, Michael P ^f   Schiappacasse, Carolina ^g   Esquenazi, Alberto ^h   Kistenberg, Robert Steven ⁱ   Kostanjsek, Nenad ^j  

^a Braeside Hospital   (Australia)

^b DIMDI   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^e IR RS   (Slovenia)

^f LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^g International Society for Prosthetic and Orthotics   (Argentina)

^h MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

ⁱ GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^j WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

more..

Author keywords

Disability; International Classification of Functioning Functioning; Rehabilitation; Rehabilitation of amputees

Indexed keywords

AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; DISABLED PERSON; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION CARE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; ARM; CLASSIFICATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; LEG; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AMPUTATION; ARM; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; LEG; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 67650596835     PISSN: 03093646     EISSN: 17461553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03093640802652029     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ephraim PL, Dillingham TR, Sector M, Pezzin LE, Mackenzie EJ. Epidemiology of limb loss and congenital limb deficiency: A review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(5):747-761.
2. Lower Extremity Amputation Study Group. Comparing the incidence of lower extremity amputations across the world: The Global Lower Extremity Amputation Study. Diabetes Med 1995;12:14-18.
3. Spichler ERS, Spichler D, Lessa I, Costa e Forti A, Franco LJ, LaPorte RE. Capture-recapture method to estimate lower extremity amputation rates in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev Panam Salud Publica/Pan Am J Public Health 2001;10(5):334-340.
4. Rayman G, Krishnan STM, Baker NR, Wareham AM, Rayman A. Are we underestimating diabetes-related lower-extremity amputation rates? Results and benefits of the first prospective study. Diabetes Care 2004;27(8):1892-1896.
5. Thanni LOA TA. Extremity amputation in Nigeria - a review of indications and mortality. The Surgeon 2007;5(4):213-218.
6. Cumming JCO, Barr S, Howe TE. Prosthetic rehabilitation for older dysvascular people following a unilateral transfemoral amputation. Cochrane Data System Rev 2006(4):CD005260.
7. Global Lower Extremity Amputation Group. Epidemiology of lower extremity amputation in centres in Europe, North America and East Asia. Br J Surg 2000;87(3):328-337.
8. Tentolouris N, AlSabbagh S, Walker MG, Boulton AJM, Jude EB. Mortality in diabetic and nondiabetic patients after amputations performed from 1990 to 1995: A 5-year follow-up study. Diabetes Care 2004;27(7):1598-1604.
9. Walsh NE, Walsh WS. Rehabilitation of landmine victims - the ultimate challenge. Bull WHO 2003;81:665-670.
10. Taylor SM, Kalbaugh CA, Blackhurst DW, Hamontree SE, Cull DL, Messich HS, Robertson RT, Langan EM, York JW, et al. Preoperative clinical factors predict postoperative functional outcomes after major lower limb amputation: An analysis of 553 consecutive patients. J Vasc Surg 2005;42:227-235.
11. Nehler MR, Coll JR, Hiatt WR. Regensteiner JG, Schnickel GT, Klenke WA, Strecker PK, Anderson MW, Jones DN, et al. Functional outcome in a contemporary series of major lower extremity amputations. J Vasc Surg 2003;38:7-14.
12. Davies B, Datta D. Mobility outcome following unilateral lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2003;27:186-190.
13. Esquenazi A, Meier RH 3rd. Rehabilitation in limb deficiency. 4. Limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77(3 Suppl.):S18-28.
14. Jensen MP, Chodroff MJ, Dworkin RH. The impact of neuropathic pain on health-related quality of life: Review and implications. Neurolpgy 2007;Apr 10;68(15):1178-1182.
15. Kooijman CM, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB, Elzinga A, Van Der Schans CP. Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: An epidemiological study. Pain 2000;87:33-41.
16. Lee RY, Turner-Smith A. The influence of the length of lower-limb prosthesis on spinal kinematics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(9):1357-1362.
17. Ephraim PL, Wegener ST, MacKenzie EJ, Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE. Phantom pain, residual limb pain, and back pain in amputees: Results of a national survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(10):1910-1919.
18. Isakov E, Burger H, Gregoric M, Marincek C. Isokinetic and isometric strength of the thigh muscles in belowknee amputees. Clin Biomech 1996;11(4):233-235.
19. Desmond D, MacLachlan M. Psychological issues in prosthetic and orthotic practice: A 25 year review of psychology in Prosthetics and Orthotics International. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002;26(3):182-188.
20. Burger H, Marincek C. Functional testing of elderly subjects after lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001;25(2):102-107.
21. Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, de Vries J, Göeken LNH, Eisma WH. Employment status, job characteristics, and work-related health experience of people with a lower limb amputation in The Netherlands. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82(2):239-245.
22. Whyte AS, Carroll LJ. A preliminary examination of the relationship between employment, pain and disability in an amputee population. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24(9):462-470.
23. Wetterhahn KA, Hanson C, Levy CE. Effect of participation in physical activity on body image of amputees. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81(3):194.
24. Whiteneck GG, Harrison-Felix CL, Mellick DC, Brooks CA, Charlifue SB, Gerhart KA. Quantifying environmental factors: A measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(8):1324-1335.
25. Ephraim PL, MacKenzie EJ, Wegener ST, Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE. Environmental barriers experienced by amputees: The Craig Hospital inventory of environmental factors-short form. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87(3):328-333.
26. Fernández A, Isusi I, Gómez M. Factors conditioning the return to work of upper limb amputees in Asturias, Spain. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2000;24(2):143-147.
27. Kejlaa GH. The social and economic outcome after upper limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1992;16(1): 25-31.
28. Datta D, Selvarajah K, Davey N. Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency-acquired and congenital. Clin Rehabil 2004;18(2):172-177.
29. Gallagher P, Desmond D. Measuring quality of life in prosthetic practice: Benefits and challenges. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31(2):167-176.
30. Condie E, Scott H, Treweek S. Lower limb prosthetic outcome measures: A review of the literature from 1995 to 2005. J Prosthet Orthot 2006;18(1S):13-31.
31. Legro MW, Reiber GD, Smith DG, del Aguila M, Larsen J, Boone D. Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: Assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:931-938.
32. Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford P and Mayo NE. Physical Rehabilitation Outcome Measures: A guide to enhanced clinical decision making. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
33. Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ, Burgess AR. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma-related amputations: A long-term outcome study. Am J Phy Med Rehabil 2001; 80(8):563-571.
34. Brooks D, Parsons J, Hunter JP, Devlin M, Walker J. The 2-minute walk test as a measure of functional improvement in persons with lower limb amputation. Arch Phy Med Rehabil 2001;82(10):1478-1483.
35. Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, de Vries J, Göeken LNH, Eisma WH. The timed 'up and go' test: Reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(7):825-828.
36. Treweek SP, Condie ME. Three measures of functional outcome for lower limb amputees: A retrospective review. Prosthet Orthot Int 1998;22:178-185.
37. Panesar BS, Morrison P, Hunter J. A comparison of three measures of progress in early lower limb amputee rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2001;15(2):157-171.
38. Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Üstün TB. Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:281-282.
39. World Health Organisation. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
40. Cieza A, Ewert T, Üstün B, Chatterji S, Konstansjek N, Stucki G. Development of ICF core sets for patients with chronic conditions. J Rehabil Med 2004;Suppl. 44(3):9-11.
41. Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24(17):932-938.
42. Üstün B, Chatterji S, Konstansjek N. Comments from WHO for the Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine special supplement on ICF Core Sets. J Rehabil Med 2004;Suppl. 44(3):7-8.
43. Stucki G, Grimby G. Foreword: Applying the ICF in medicine. J Rehabil Med 2004;Suppl. 44(3):5-6.
44. Stucki G, Üstün BT, Melvin J. Applying the ICF for the acute hospital and early postacute facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(7/ 8):349-352.
45. Stucki G, Stier-Jarmer M, Grill E, Melvin J. Rationale and principles of early rehabilitation care after an acute injury or illness. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(7/8):353-360.
46. Grill E, Ewert T, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF Core Set development for the acute hospital and early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(7/8):361-366.
47. Cieza A, Hilfiker R, Boonen A, Van der Heijde D, Braun J, Stucki G. Towards an ICF-based clinical measure of functioning in people with ankylosing spondylitis: A methodological exploration. Disabil Rehabil in press. 12 June 2008. http://www.informaworld.com/10/1080/ 09638280802175475.
48. Grill E, Stucki G. Scales could be developed based on simple clinical ratings of ICF Core Set categories. J Clin Epidemiol in press. 11 July 2008. (10.1016/j.jclinepi2008.02.033).
49. Scheuringer M, Stucki G, Huber EO, Brach M, Schwarzkopf SR, Kostanjsek N, et al. ICF Core Set for patients with musculoskeletal conditions in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(7/ 8):405-410.
50. Stier-Jarmer M Grill E, Ewert T, Bartholomeyczik S, Finger M, Mokrusch T, et al. ICF Core Set for patients with neurological conditions in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(7/ 8):389-396.
51. Wildner M, Quittan M, Portenier L, Wilke S, Boldt C, Stucki G, et al. ICF Core Set for patients with cardiopulmonary conditions early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(7/ 8):397-404.
52. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, Üstün TB, Stucki G. Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Rehabil Med 2002;34(5):205-210.
53. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO; 2001.