Quantitative prediction of body surface potentials from myocardial action potentials using a summed dipole model

Cardiovascular Engineering

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 59-71

  Babbs, Charles F ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action potential; Body surface potential mapping; Electrocardiography; Forward problem; Infarction; Injury; Ioniccurrents; Transmembrane potential; Vector

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE POTENTIAL; DIPOLE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; HEART DEPOLARIZATION; HEART MUSCLE CELL; HEART MUSCLE FIBER MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; HEART MUSCLE POTENTIAL; HEART REPOLARIZATION; HUMAN; P WAVE; QRS COMPLEX; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; R WAVE; ST SEGMENT; T WAVE;

ACTION POTENTIALS; BODY SURFACE POTENTIAL MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART CONDUCTION SYSTEM; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR;

EID: 67650587295     PISSN: 15678822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10558-009-9075-2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barr RC, Pilkington TC, Boineau JP, Spach MS. Determining surface potentials from current dipoles, with application to electrocardiography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1966;BME-13:88-92. doi: 10.1109/TBME.1966.4502411.
2. Boron WF, Boulpaep EL. Medical physiology. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005. p. 1319.
3. Clark J, Plonsey R. The extracellular potential field of the single active nerve fiber in a volume conductor. Biophys J. 1968;8:842-64. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(68)86524-5.
4. De Ambroggi L, Bertoni T, Locati E, Stramba-Badiale M, Schwartz PJ. Mapping of body surface potentials in patients with the idiopathic long QT syndrome. Circulation. 1986;74:1334-45.
5. diFiori MSH. Atlas of human histology. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1981. p. 267.
6. Downar E, Janse MJ, Durrer D. The effect of acute coronary artery occlusion on subepicardial transmembrane potentials in the intact porcine heart. Circulation. 1977;56:217-24.
7. Faes TJ, van der Meij HA, de Munck JC, Heethaar RM. The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): A meta-analysis of review studies. Physiol Meas. 1999;20:R1-10. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/20/4/201.
8. Friedman SM, Friedman CL, Nakashima M. Sodium gradient and renoprival hypertension in the rat. Circ Res. 1959;7:917-25.
9. Geddes LA, Baker LE. Prinicples of applied biomedical instrumentation. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1975.
10. Gelernter HL, Swihart JCA. Mathematical-Physical model of the genesis of the electrocardiogram. Biophys J. 1964;4:285-301. doi: 10.1016/ S0006-3495(64)86783-7.
11. Gentet LJ, Stuart GJ, Clements JD. Direct measurement of specific membrane capacitance in neurons. Biophys J. 2000;79:314-20. doi: 10.1016/ S0006-3495(00)76293-X.
12. Geselowitz DB. On the theory of the electrocardiogram. Proc IEEE. 1989;77:857-76. doi: 10.1109/5.29327.
13. Grant RPRP. Grant's clinical electrocardiography: The spatial vector approach. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1957.
14. Gulrajani RM. The forward problem of electrocardiography: From heart models to body surface potentials. Proceedings 19th international conference IEEE/EMBS. 1997. p. 2604-2609.
15. Hanninen H, Takala P, Rantonen J, et al. ST-T integral and T-wave amplitude in detection of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia evaluated with body surface potential mapping. J Electrocardiol. 2003;36:89-98. doi: 10.1054/jelc.2003.50013.
16. Hoff HE, Nahum LH. The electrocardiographic localization of myocardial infarcts by injury currents and ventricular extrasystoles. Am J Physiol. 1945;143:720-3.
17. Kip AF. Fundamentals of electricity and magnetism. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1969. p. 630.
18. Klug D, Ferracci A, Molin F, et al. Body surface potential distributions during idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1995;91:2002-9.
19. Lines GT, Buist ML, Grottum P, Pullan AJ, Sundnes J, Tveito A. Mathematical models and numerical methods for the forward problem in cardiac electrophysiology. Comput Visualization Sci. 2003;5:215-39. doi: 10.1007/s00791-003-0101-4.
20. Miller WT, Geselowitz DB. Simulation studies of the electrocardiogram. I. The normal heart. Circ Res. 1978;43:301-15.
21. Myerburg RJ, Gelband H, Nilsson K, Castellanos A, Morales AR, Bassett AL. The role of canine superficial ventricular muscle fibers in endocardial impulse distribution. Circ Res. 1978;42:27-35.
22. Rudy Y, Plonsey R. A comparison of volume conductor and source geometry effects on body surface and epicardial potentials. Circ Res. 1980;46:283-91.
23. Selby SM. CRC standard mathematical tables. Cleveland; 1975. p. 756.
24. Selvester RH, Solomon JC, Gillespie TL. Digital computer model of a total body ECG surface map: Adult male torso simulation with lungs. UCLA Forum Med Sci. 1970;10:369-76.
25. + channels in guinea pig ventricular cells and its modulation by glycolysis. Cardiovasc Res. 1997;35:273-82. doi: 10.1016/ S0008-6363(97)00092-8.
26. Taccardi B. Distribution of heart potentials on the thoracic surface of normal human subjects. Circ Res. 1963;12:341-52.
27. Wilde AA, Escande D, Schumacher CA, et al. Potassium accumulation in the globally ischemic mammalian heart. A role for the ATP-sensitive potassium channel. Circ Res. 1990;67:835-43.
28. + loss, reduction in repolarization time, and tissue ATP levels during myocardial hypoxia and ischemia. Circ Res. 1993;72:560-70.