Regulating recognition decisions through incremental reinforcement learning

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 469-474

  Han, Sanghoon ^a   Dobbins, Ian G ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LEARNING; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RECALL; RECOGNITION; REINFORCEMENT;

CULTURE; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); MENTAL RECALL; PROBABILITY LEARNING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 67650567289     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.3.469     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2005). Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 149-178.
2. Ashby, F. G., & O'Brien, J. B. (2007). The effects of positive versus negative feedback on information-integration category learning. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 865-878.
3. Azimian-Faridani, N., & Wilding, E. L. (2006). The influence of criterion shifts on electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1075-1086.
4. Butterfield, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2001). Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1491-1494.
5. Cincotta, C. M., & Seger, C. A. (2007). Dissociation between striatal regions while learning to categorize via feedback and via observation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 249-265.
6. Dorfman, D. D., & Biderman, M. (1971). A learning model for a continuum of sensory states. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 264-284.
7. Estes, W. K., & Maddox, W. T. (1995). Interactions of stimulus attributes, base rates, and feedback in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1075-1095.
8. Frank, M. J., & Kong, L. (2008). Learning to avoid in older age. Psychology & Aging, 23, 392-398.
9. Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988). Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 166-195.
10. Han, S., & Dobbins, I. G. (2008). Examining recognition criterion rigidity during testing using a biased-feedback technique: Evidence for adaptive criterion learning. Memory & Cognition, 36, 703-715.
11. Healy, A. F., & Kubovy, M. (1977). A comparison of recognition memory to numerical decision: How prior probabilities affect cutoff location. Memory & Cognition, 5, 3-9.
12. Hirshman, E. (1998). On the utility of the signal detection model of the remember-know paradigm. Consciousness & Cognition, 7, 103-107.
13. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
14. Knowlton, B. J., Mangels, J. A., & Squire, L. R. (1996). A neostriatal habit learning system in humans. Science, 273, 1399-1402.
15. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Mehta, R., & Williams, D. A. (2002). Elemental and configural processing of novel cues in deterministic and probabilistic tasks. Learning & Motivation, 33, 456-484.
17. Merikle, P. M., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 224-233.
18. Poldrack, R. A., Sabb, F. W., Foerde, K., Tom, S. M., Asarnow, R. F., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Knowlton, B. J. (2005). The neural correlates of motor skill automaticity. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 5356-5364.
19. Rhodes, M. G., & Jacoby, L. L. (2007). On the dynamic nature of response criterion in recognition memory: Effects of base rate, awareness, and feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 305-320.
20. Robinson, A. L., Heaton, R. K., Lehman, R. A. W., & Stilson, D. W. (1980). The utility of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in detecting and localizing frontal lobe lesions. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 48, 605-614.
21. Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., Reeder, J. A., & Wong, M. (2005). The remember response: Subject to bias, graded, and not a process-pure indicator of recollection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 865-873.
22. Rotello, C. M., Masson, M. E. J., & Verde, M. F. (2008). Type I error rates and power analyses for single-point sensitivity measures. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 389-401.
23. Saint-Cyr, J. A., Taylor, A. E., & Lang, A. E. (1988). Procedural learning and neostriatal dysfunction in man. Brain, 111, 941-959.
24. Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D. C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 352-359.
25. Schultz, W. (2000). Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1, 199-207.
26. Strack, F., & Förster, J. (1995). Reporting recollective experiences: Direct access to memory systems? Psychological Science, 6, 352-358.
27. Thomas, E. A. (1973). On a class of additive learning models: Error-correcting and probability matching. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 10, 241-264.
28. Unkelbach, C. (2006). The learned interpretation of cognitive fluency. Psychological Science, 17, 339-345.
29. Van Zandt, T. (2000). ROC curves and confidence judgments in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 582-600.
30. Verde, M. F., & Rotello, C. M. (2007). Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 35, 254-262.
31. Wixted, J. T., & Gaitan, S. C. (2002). Cognitive theories as reinforcement history surrogates: The case of likelihood ratio models of human recognition memory. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 289-305.
32. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.