Architectural mismatch: Why reuse is still so hard

IEEE Software

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 66-69

  Garlan, David ^a   Allen, Robert ^b   Ockerbloom, John ^c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b IBM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Architecture mismatch; Component based systems; Computer architecture; Computer science; Data mining; Libraries; Probability density function; Software; Software architecture; Software engineering; Standards

Indexed keywords

COMPONENT-BASED SYSTEMS; NATURE OF SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE;

ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; COMPUTERS; LIBRARIES; MINING; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; STANDARDS;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 67650506997     PISSN: 07407459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MS.2009.86     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. D. Garlan, R. Allen, and J. Ockerbloom, "Architectural Mismatch: Why Reuse Is So Hard," IEEE Software, Nov./Dec. 1995, pp. 17-26.
2. D. Garlan, R. Allen, and J. Ockerbloom, "Architectural Mismatch, or, Why It's Hard to Build Systems Out of Existing Parts," Proc. 17th Int'l Conf. Software Eng. (ICSE 95), IEEE CS Press, 1995, pp. 179-185.
3. M. Shaw and D. Garlan, Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline, Prentice Hall, 1996.
4. F. Buschman et al., Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A System of Patterns, Vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
5. P. Clements et al., Documenting Software Architectures: Views and Beyond, Addison-Wesley, 2003.
6. Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems: ANSI/IEEE Std 1471 :: ISO/IEC 42010, IEEE, 2009; www.iso-architecture.org/ieee-1471.