A prospective randomized study of clinical outcomes in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy treated with open-door or french-door laminoplasty

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1119-1126

  Okada, Motohiro ^a   Minamide, Akihito ^a   Endo, Toru ^a   Yoshida, Munehito ^a   Kawakami, Mamoru ^a   Ando, Muneharu ^a   Hashizume, Hiroshi ^a   Nakagawa, Yukihiro ^a   Maio, Kazuhiro ^a  

^a WAKAYAMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Axial pain; Cervical spine; French door laminoplasty; Open door laminoplasty; Prospective study

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CERVICOBRACHIAL NEURALGIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAMINOPLASTY; LORDOSIS; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SHOULDER PAIN; SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67650480192     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c3b61     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y. Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:956-61.
2. Baba H, Furusawa N, Chen Q, et al. Cervical laminoplasty in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments. Paraplegia 1995;33: 25-9.
3. Cheng WC, Chang CN, Lui TN, et al. Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. Surg Neurol 1994; 41:90-7.
4. Saruhashi Y, Hukuda S, Katsuura A, et al. A long-term follow-up study of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by "French window" laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 1999;12:99-101.
5. HirabayashiK, ToyamaY, Chiba K. Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossificationof the longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;359: 35-48.
6. Yoshida M, Tamaki T, Kawakami M, et al. Indication and clinical results of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy caused by disc herniation with developmental canal stenosis. Spine 1998;23:2391-7.
7. Heller JG, Edwards CC II, Murakami H, et al. Laminoplasty versus laminec-tomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis. Spine 2001;26:1330-6.
8. Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, et al. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 2001;26:479-87.
9. Tanaka J, Seki N, Tokimura F, et al. Operative results of canal-expansive laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in elderly patients. Spine 1999;24:2308-12.
10. Iwasaki M, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T, et al. Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years follow up. J Neurosurg 2002;96(suppl 2):180-9.
11. Ogawa Y, Toyama Y, Chiba K, et al. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine 2004;1:168-74.
12. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, et al. Long-term outcome of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to disc herniation: a comparative study of lamin-oplasty and anterior spinal fusion. Spine 2005;30:756-9.
13. Wang MY, Shah S, Green BA. Clinical outcomes following cervical lamin-oplasty for 204 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 2004;62:487-92.
14. Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K, et al. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy-average 14-year follow-up study. Spine 2006;31:2998-3005.
15. Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T, et al. Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 1994; 19:507-10.
16. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, et al. Minimum 10-year follow-up after en block cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop 2003;411:129-39.
17. Satomi K, Ogawa J, Ishii Y, et al. Short-term complications and long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopa-thy. Spine J 2001;1:26-30.
18. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Ishihara H, et al. Axial symptoms after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 1999;12:392-5.
19. HosonoN,Yonenobu K,Ono K.Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty: a noticeable complication. Spine 1996;21:1969-73.
20. Tsuji H. Laminoplasty for patients with compressive myelopathy due to so-called spinal canal stenosis in cervical and thoracic regions. Spine 1982; 7:28-34.
21. Kurokawa T, Tsuyama N, Tanaka H, et al. Enlargement of spinal canal by sagittal splitting of the spinal processes [in Japanese]. Bessatsu Seikeigeka 1982;2:234-40.
22. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, et al. Expansive open-door lamin-oplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 1983;8:693-9.
23. Koyama T, Iwasaki K, Watanabe K, et al. Osteoplastic laminectomy using hydroxyapatite ceramic implants [in Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 1986;14: 151-9.
24. Kawai S, Sunago K, Doi K, et al. Cervical laminoplasty (Hattori's method). Procedure and follow-up results. Spine 1988;13:1245-50.
25. Yoshida M, Otani K, Shibasaki K, et al. Expansive laminoplasty with reat-tachment of spinous process and extensor musculature for cervical myelop-athy. Spine 1992;17:491-7.
26. MochidaJ,NomuraT,ChibaM, etal. Modified expansive open-door lamin-oplasty in cervical myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 1999;12:386-91.
27. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Toribatake Y, et al. Expansive midline T-saw laminoplasty (modified spinous process-splitting) for the management of cervical myelopathy. Spine 1998;23:32-7.
28. Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, et al. Tension-band laminoplasty of the cervical spine. Int Orthop 1996;20:275-84.
29. Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, et al. En bloc laminoplasty without dissection of paraspinal muscles. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;3:29-33.
30. NakamaS, Nitanai K, Oohashi Y, et al. Cervical muscle strength after lamin-oplasty. J Orthop Sci 2003;8:36-40.
31. Takeuchi T, Shono Y. Importance of preserving the C7 spinous process and attached nuchal ligament in French-door laminoplasty to reduce postoperative axial symptoms. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1417-22.
32. Liu J, Ebraheim NA, Sanford CG Jr, et al. Preservation of the spinous process-ligament-muscle complex to prevent kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty. Spine J 2007;7:159-64.
33. Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, et al. The source of axial pain after cervical laminoplasty-C7 is more crucial than deep extensor muscles. Spine 2007;32: 2985-8.
34. Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, et al. C3-6 laminoplasty takes over C3-7 laminoplasty with significantly lower incidence of axial neck pain. Eur Spine J 2006;15:1375-9.
35. Yoshida M, Tamaki T, Kawakami M, et al. Does reconstruction of posterior ligamentous complex with extensor musculature decrease axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty? Spine 2002;13:1414-8.