Does opening adoption records have an adverse social impact? Some lessons from the U.S., Great Britain, and Australia, 1953-2007

Adoption Quarterly

Volumn 10, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 29-52

  Carp, E Wayne ^a  

^a PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adoption; Adoption records; Adoptive parents; Birth mothers; Birth parents; Contact preference forms; Contact vetoes; Search

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650471332     PISSN: 10926755     EISSN: 1544452X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10926750802163188     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. (2000)
2. (1976)
3. Adoption Information Amendment Act (1995)
4. Adoption Information Disclosure Act (2005)
5. ALMA Soc'y, Inc (1979)
6. Associated Press (2000) La Grande man tracks down birth mother. Oregonian, p. E2.
7. Allan, L. (1980) Confirming the constitutionality of sealing adoption records. Brooklyn Law Review, 46, pp. 717-745.
8. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2005) Adoptions Australia 2004-05, AIHW, Canberra
9. Ball, C. (2002) Regulating inclusively: Reforming adoption law for the 21st century. Child and Family Social Work, 7, pp. 285-296.
10. Ball, C. (2005) The Adoption and Children Act 2002: A critical examination. Adoption and Fostering, 29:2, pp. 6-17.
11. Bridge, C. and Swindells, H. (2003) Adoption - The modern law, Family Law, Bristol
12. Cahn, N. and Singer, J. (1999) Adoption, identity, and the constitution: The case for opening closed records. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2, pp. 150-194.
13. Campbell, M. (2007) Ontario crafts new adoption bill to uphold privacy standards. Globe and Mail, p. A8.
14. Carp, E. W. (1998) Family matters: Secrecy and disclosure in the history of adoption, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
15. Carp, E. W. (2004) Adoption politics: Bastard Nation and Ballot Initiative 58, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
16. Carp, E. W. How tight was the seal? A reappraisal of adoption records in the United States, England, and New Zealand. International advances in adoption research for practice, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
17. v. Ontario, Cheskes (2007)
18. Child Welfare League of America (2000) Standards of excellence: CWLA standards of excellence for adoption services, CWLA, Washington, D.C.
19. Crane, A. (1986) Unsealing adoption records: The right to know versus the right to privacy. 1986 Annual Survey of American Law, pp. 645-666.
20. Day, C. (1980) General register office study. Access to birth records: The impact of section 26 of the Children Act 1975, pp. 21-33. Association of British Adoption and Fostering Agencies, London
21. Fisher, F. (1973) The search for Anna Fisher, Fawcett Crest, New York
22. Giddings, K. J. (1980) The current status of the right of adult adoptees to know the identity of their natural parents. Washington University Law Quarterly, 58, pp. 677-703.
23. Gloor, C. (1980) Breaking the seal: Constitutional and statutory approaches to adult adoptees' right to identity. Northwestern University Law Review, 75, pp. 316-344.
24. Graves, B. (2000) Fewer adoptees requests made. Oregonian, p. E1.
25. Graves, B. (2006) Adoptees' rights advocate returns to a quiet life in bay city. Oregonian, p. E1.
26. Great Britain (1972) Report of the departmental committee on the adoption of children, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London
27. Haimes, E. and Timms, N. (1983) Access to birth records and counselling of adopted persons under section 26 of the Children Act, 1975, Department of Health and Social Services, U.K.
28. Haimes, E. and Timms, N. (1985) Adoption, identity and social policy: The search for distant relatives, Gower Publishing House, Hants, U.K.
29. Hall, T. (1980) Introduction. Access to birth records: The impact of section 26 of the Children Act 1975, pp. 3-8. Association of British Adoption and Fostering Agencies, London
30. Hansard (2005) Official report of debates, Legislative Assembly of Ontario, Toronto
31. Hilborn, R. (2007) Opening adoption records: Success in Ontario
32. Hollinger, J. H. (2000) Aftermath of adoption: Legal and social consequences. Adoption law and practice, 2, Matthew Bender, New York
33. Howe, D. and Feast, J. (2003) Adoption, search and reunion. The long-term experience of adopted adults, British Association for Adoption and Fostering, London
34. Klauer, J. (1993) Open adoption records: A question of empowerment. Saskatchewan Law Review, 57, pp. 416-424.
35. Kuhns, J. (1994) The sealed adoption records controversy: Breaking down the walls of secrecy. Golden Gate University Law Review, 24:1, pp. 259-297.
36. Levin, M. A. (1979) The adoption trilemma: The adult adoptee's emerging search for his ancestral identity. University of Baltimore Law Review, 8, pp. 496-518.
37. Livingston, G. (2005) Adoption disclosure law could shatter lives: Privacy commissioner
38. Maine Revised Statute Amendment (2007)
39. Marshall, A. and McDonald, M. (2001) The many-sided triangle: Adoption in Australia, Melbourne University Press, Victoria
40. McPhee, G. and Webster, M. (1993) Exposing adoption myths: Access to information about origins in Victoria. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 28:2, pp. 143-157.
41. Nemy, E. (1972) Adopted children who wonder, What was mother like?
42. New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Standing Committee on Social Issues (2000) Releasing the past - Adoption practices 1950-1998, New South Wales, Australia
43. New South Wales Law Reform Commission (1992) Sydney, Australia
44. New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann (1932)
45. Oregon Department of Human Services, Center for Health Statistics (2005) Measure 58 Update Significant Dates and Events
46. Oregon Department of Human Services, Center for Health Statistics (2002) Measure 58 Update Significant Dates and Events
47. Poulin, D. D. (1987) The open adoption records movement: Constitutional cases and legislative compromise. Journal of Family Law, 26, pp. 395-418.
48. Samuels, E. J. (2001) The idea of adoption: An inquiry into the history of adult adoptee access to birth records. Rutgers Law Review, 53, pp. 367-436.
49. Swain, P. A. (1992) Adoption information services: Myths and realities. To search for self: The experience of access to adoption information, pp. 25-37. Federation Press, Annandale, NSW
50. Taylor, K. (2000) Nearly 2,400 adoptees have filed for records. Oregonian, p. A8.
51. Taylor, K. (2000) Birth certificate speeds reunion. Oregonian, p. B7.
52. Taylor, K. (2000) Reunion sends Oregon adoptee and her birth mother through the looking glass. Oregonian, p. D1.
53. Taylor, K. (2000) Closing the family circle. Oregonian, p. A1.
54. Triseliotis, J. (1973) In search of origins: The experience of adopted people, London, Routledge, Kegan
55. Triseliotis, J. (1979) The rights of adoptees, adoptive parents and natural parents. Proceedings of second Australian conference on adoption, pp. 28-46. Melbourne
56. Triseliotis, J. (1984) Obtaining birth certificates. Adoption: Essays in social policy, law, and sociology, pp. 39-53. Tavistock, London and New York
57. Triseliotis, J. P., Feast, J. and Kyle, F. (2005) The adoption triangle revisited: A study of adoption, search and reunion experiences, British Association for Adoption and Fostering, London
58. Turner, J. N. (1993) Review of the Adoption Information Act 1990 (NSW), July 1992. Monash University Law Review, 19, pp. 343-355.
59. U.S. House of Representatives (2000) Adoption reunion registries and screening of adults working with children, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
60. Verrier, N. N. (1993) The primal wound: Understanding the adopted child, Gateway Press, Baltimore, MD
61. Witmer, H. L. (1963) Independent adoptions: A follow-up study, Russell Sage Foundation, New York