What's wrong with hazard-ranking stems? An expository note: Perspectives

Risk Analysis

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 940-948

  Cox Jr , Louis Anthony ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Homeland security; Portfolio optimization; Risk management priorities; Risk matrices; Risk rating; Risk scoring; Superfund; Vulnerability assessment

Indexed keywords

HOMELAND SECURITY; PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION; RISK RATING; RISK SCORING; SUPERFUND; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT;

FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING; OPTIMIZATION; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SECURITY OF DATA; SECURITY SYSTEMS;

DECISION MAKING;

BUSINESS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; SECURITY; TERRORISM; VULNERABILITY;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEM; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK REDUCTION; SCORING SYSTEM; TERRORISM;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;

EID: 67650465763     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01209.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Cox LA Jr. What's wrong with risk matrices? Risk Analysis 2008a 28 (2 497 512.
2. Cox LA Jr. Some limitations of "Risk = Threat × Vulnerability × Consequence" for risk analysis of terrorist attacks. Risk Analysis, 2008b 28 (6 1749 1762.
3. Doctor JN, Bleichrodt H, Miyamoto J, Temkin NR, Dikmen S. A new and more robust test of QALYs. Journal of Health Economics, 2004 23 (2 353 367. (Pubitemid 38333031)
4. Dyer JS, Jia J. Preference conditions for utility models: A risk-value perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 1998 80 (1 167 182. Available at : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.39.5480, Accessed March 14, 2009.
5. Dyer JS, Sarin RK. Measurable multiattribute value functions. Operations Research 1979 27 (4 810 822.
6. Hazen, G., Sounderpandian J. Lottery acquisition versus information acquisition: Price and preference reversals. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1999 18 (2 125 136.
7. Infanger G. Dynamic asset allocation strategies using a stochastic dynamic programming approach. Pp. 200-205 in Zenios SA, Ziemba WT (eds). Handbook of Assets and Liability Management, Vol. 1. New York : North Holland, 2006.
8. Jones P, Edmonds Y. Risk-based strategies for allocating resources in a constrained environment. Journal of Homeland Security, 2008. http://www.homelandsecurity.org/newjournal/Articles/displayArticle2.asp?article= 171, Accessed March 14, 2009.
9. Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. New York : Wiley, 1976.
10. MacIntyre CR, Seccull A, Lane JM, Plant A. Development of a risk-priority score for category A bioterrorism agents as an aid for public health policy. Military Medicine, 2006 171 (7 589 594. (Pubitemid 44061561)
11. Mitchell C, Decker C. Applying risk-based decision-making methods and tools to U.S. navy antiterrorism capabilities. Journal of Homeland Security, 2004. http://www.homelandsecurity.org/journal/Articles/Mitchell-Decker.html