-
1
-
-
33645120943
-
Measuring the quality of endoscopy . Gastrointest Endosc
-
63S1-2
-
Bjorkman DJ, Popp JW Jr. Measuring the quality of endoscopy . Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63S1-2.
-
(2006)
-
-
Bjorkman, D.J.1
Popp Jr., J.W.2
-
2
-
-
0032760227
-
Unsedated small-caliber esophagogas-troduodenoscopy (EGD) vs. conventional EGD: A comparative study
-
Sorbi D, Gostout CJ, Henry J et al. Unsedated small-caliber esophagogas-troduodenoscopy (EGD) vs. conventional EGD: a comparative study . Gastroenterology 1999;117:1301-7.
-
(1999)
Gastroenterology
, vol.117
, pp. 1301-1307
-
-
Sorbi, D.1
Gostout, C.J.2
Henry, J.3
-
3
-
-
0344197111
-
Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD: A multicenter randomized trial
-
Garcia RT, Cello JP, Nguyen MH et al. Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD: a multicenter randomized trial . Gastroenterology 2003 ; 125 : 1606-12.
-
(2003)
Gastroenterology
, vol.125
, pp. 1606-1612
-
-
Garcia, R.T.1
Cello, J.P.2
Nguyen, M.H.3
-
4
-
-
0348072194
-
-
Sorbi D, Chak A. Unsedated EGD . Gastrointest Endosc 2003 ; 58 : 102-10.
-
Sorbi D, Chak A. Unsedated EGD . Gastrointest Endosc 2003 ; 58 : 102-10.
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
0032975835
-
A randomized trial of peroral vs. tran-snasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope
-
Zaman A, Hahn M, Hapke R et al. A randomized trial of peroral vs. tran-snasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope . Gastrointest Endosc 1999 ; 49 : 279-84.
-
(1999)
Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.49
, pp. 279-284
-
-
Zaman, A.1
Hahn, M.2
Hapke, R.3
-
6
-
-
33751420996
-
Unsedated ultrathin EGD by using a 5.2-mm-diameter videoscope: Evaluation of acceptability and diagnostic accuracy
-
Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y. Unsedated ultrathin EGD by using a 5.2-mm-diameter videoscope: evaluation of acceptability and diagnostic accuracy . Gastrointest Endosc 2006 ; 64 : 868-73.
-
(2006)
Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.64
, pp. 868-873
-
-
Horiuchi, A.1
Nakayama, Y.2
-
7
-
-
0042388507
-
A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin vs. standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: Does it work better through the nose?
-
Birkner B, Fritz N, Schatke W et al. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin vs. standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose? Endoscopy 2003;35:647-51.
-
(2003)
Endoscopy
, vol.35
, pp. 647-651
-
-
Birkner, B.1
Fritz, N.2
Schatke, W.3
-
8
-
-
3042709616
-
Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: A prospective study using low dose propofol, meperidine/fenta-nyl, and midazolam
-
Cohen LB, Hightower CD, Wood DA et al. Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: a prospective study using low dose propofol, meperidine/fenta-nyl, and midazolam . Gastrointest Endosc 2004 ; 59 : 795-803.
-
(2004)
Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.59
, pp. 795-803
-
-
Cohen, L.B.1
Hightower, C.D.2
Wood, D.A.3
-
9
-
-
50549095131
-
Propofol sedation for endoscopic procedures in patients 90 years of age and older
-
Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Tanaka N et al. Propofol sedation for endoscopic procedures in patients 90 years of age and older . Digestion 2008 ; 78 : 20-3.
-
(2008)
Digestion
, vol.78
, pp. 20-23
-
-
Horiuchi, A.1
Nakayama, Y.2
Tanaka, N.3
-
10
-
-
57649124396
-
Safety and driving ability following low-dose propofol sedation
-
Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Katsuyama Y et al. Safety and driving ability following low-dose propofol sedation . Digestion 2008 ; 78 : 190-4.
-
(2008)
Digestion
, vol.78
, pp. 190-194
-
-
Horiuchi, A.1
Nakayama, Y.2
Katsuyama, Y.3
-
11
-
-
0034080387
-
Propofol vs. midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy
-
Koshy G, Nair S, Norkus EP et al. Propofol vs. midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy . Am J Gastroenterol 2000 ; 95 : 1476-9.
-
(2000)
Am J Gastroenterol
, vol.95
, pp. 1476-1479
-
-
Koshy, G.1
Nair, S.2
Norkus, E.P.3
-
12
-
-
0036616768
-
Propofol vs. midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: Administration by nurses supervised by endo-scopists
-
Sipe BW, Rex DK, Latinovich D et al. Propofol vs. midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endo-scopists . Gastrointest Endosc 2002 ; 55 : 815-25.
-
(2002)
Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.55
, pp. 815-825
-
-
Sipe, B.W.1
Rex, D.K.2
Latinovich, D.3
-
13
-
-
0036245555
-
Safety of propofol administered by registered nurses with gastroenterologist supervision in 2000 endoscopic cases
-
Rex DK, Overley C, Kinser K et al. Safety of propofol administered by registered nurses with gastroenterologist supervision in 2000 endoscopic cases . Am J Gastroenterol 2002 ; 97 : 1159-63.
-
(2002)
Am J Gastroenterol
, vol.97
, pp. 1159-1163
-
-
Rex, D.K.1
Overley, C.2
Kinser, K.3
-
14
-
-
0043074854
-
Nurse-administered propofol sedation without anesthesia specialists in 9152 endoscopic cases in an ambulatory surgery center
-
Walker JA, McIntyre RD, Schleinitz PF et al. Nurse-administered propofol sedation without anesthesia specialists in 9152 endoscopic cases in an ambulatory surgery center . Am J Gastroenterol 2003 ; 98 : 1744-50.
-
(2003)
Am J Gastroenterol
, vol.98
, pp. 1744-1750
-
-
Walker, J.A.1
McIntyre, R.D.2
Schleinitz, P.F.3
-
15
-
-
0038107241
-
Risk stratifcation and safe administration of propofol by registered nurses supervised by the gastroenterologist: A prospective observational study of more than 2000 cases
-
Heuss LT, Schnieper P, Drewe J et al. Risk stratifcation and safe administration of propofol by registered nurses supervised by the gastroenterologist: a prospective observational study of more than 2000 cases . Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:664-71.
-
(2003)
Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.57
, pp. 664-671
-
-
Heuss, L.T.1
Schnieper, P.2
Drewe, J.3
-
16
-
-
0042574162
-
Safety of propofol for conscious sedation during endoscopic procedures in high-risk patients - a prospective, controlled study
-
Heuss LT, Schnieper P, Drewe J et al. Safety of propofol for conscious sedation during endoscopic procedures in high-risk patients - a prospective, controlled study . Am J Gastroenterol 2003 ; 98 : 1751-7.
-
(2003)
Am J Gastroenterol
, vol.98
, pp. 1751-1757
-
-
Heuss, L.T.1
Schnieper, P.2
Drewe, J.3
-
17
-
-
0042388525
-
Safety of nonanesthetist sedation with propofol for outpatient colonoscopy and esophago-gastroduodenos- copy
-
Külling D, Rothenbühler R, Inauen W Safety of nonanesthetist sedation with propofol for outpatient colonoscopy and esophago-gastroduodenos- copy. Endoscopy 2003;35:679-82.
-
(2003)
Endoscopy
, vol.35
, pp. 679-682
-
-
Külling, D.1
Rothenbühler, R.2
Inauen, W.3
-
18
-
-
0242710115
-
Propofol for endoscopic sedation: A protocol for safe and effective administration by the gastroenterologist
-
Cohen LB, Dubovsky AN, Aisenberg J et al. Propofol for endoscopic sedation: a protocol for safe and effective administration by the gastroenterologist . Gastrointest Endosc 2003 ; 58 : 725-32.
-
(2003)
Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.58
, pp. 725-732
-
-
Cohen, L.B.1
Dubovsky, A.N.2
Aisenberg, J.3
-
19
-
-
27744533842
-
Trained registered nurses/endoscopy teams can administer propofol safely for endoscopy
-
Rex DK, Heuss LT, Walker JA et al. Trained registered nurses/endoscopy teams can administer propofol safely for endoscopy . Gastroenterology 2005;129:1384-91.
-
(2005)
Gastroenterology
, vol.129
, pp. 1384-1391
-
-
Rex, D.K.1
Heuss, L.T.2
Walker, J.A.3
-
20
-
-
33646162883
-
Propofol sedation during endoscopic procedures: Safe and effective administration by registered nurses supervised by endoscopists
-
Tohda G, Higashi S, Wakahara S et al. Propofol sedation during endoscopic procedures: safe and effective administration by registered nurses supervised by endoscopists . Endoscopy 2006 ; 38 : 360-7.
-
(2006)
Endoscopy
, vol.38
, pp. 360-367
-
-
Tohda, G.1
Higashi, S.2
Wakahara, S.3
-
21
-
-
0035142438
-
Evaluation of topical pharyngeal anesthesia for upper endoscopy including factors associated with patient tolerance
-
Soma Y, Saito H, Kishibe T et al. Evaluation of topical pharyngeal anesthesia for upper endoscopy including factors associated with patient tolerance . Gastrointest Endosc 2001 ; 53 : 14-8.
-
(2001)
Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.53
, pp. 14-18
-
-
Soma, Y.1
Saito, H.2
Kishibe, T.3
-
22
-
-
34250693437
-
A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy
-
Sharma VK, Nguyen CC, Crowell MD et al. A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy . Gastrointest Endosc 2007;66:27- 34.
-
(2007)
Gastrointest Endosc
, vol.66
, pp. 27-34
-
-
Sharma, V.K.1
Nguyen, C.C.2
Crowell, M.D.3
-
23
-
-
33745884101
-
Quality of psychomotor recovery after propofol sedation for routine endoscopy: A randomized and controlled study
-
Riphaus A, Gstettenbauer T, Frenz MB et al. Quality of psychomotor recovery after propofol sedation for routine endoscopy: a randomized and controlled study Endoscopy 2006;38:677-83.
-
(2006)
Endoscopy
, vol.38
, pp. 677-683
-
-
Riphaus, A.1
Gstettenbauer, T.2
Frenz, M.B.3
|