Differences in measured mammographic density in the menstrual cycle

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1993-1999

  Hovhannisyan, Gayane ^a   Chow, Lorraine ^a   Schlosser, Alexandra ^a   Yaffe, Martin J ^b   Boyd, Norman F ^a   Martin, Lisa J ^a  

^a PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY DENSITY; BREAST CANCER; CANADA; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; PREMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELATIVE DENSITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CANADA; FEMALE; FOLLICULAR PHASE; HUMANS; LUTEAL PHASE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; MIDDLE AGED; PREMENOPAUSE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 67650395600     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0074     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Mushlin AI, Kouides RW, Shapiro DE. Estimatingthe accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 1998;14:143-53.
2. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:347-60.
3. Buist DS, Porter PL, Lehman C, Taplin SH, White E. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1432-40.
4. Buist DSM, Aiello EJ, Miglioretti DL, White E. Mammographic breast density, dense area, and breast area differences by phase in the menstrual cycle. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:2303-6.
5. Baines CJ, Vidmar M, McKeown-Eyssen G, Tibshirani R. Impact of menstrual phase on false-negative mammograms in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Cancer 1997;80:720-4.
6. Going JJ, Anderson TJ, Battersby S, MacIntyre CCA. Proliferative and secretory activity in human breast during natural and artificial menstrual cycles. Am J Pathol 1988;130:193-204.
7. Simpson HW, Cornelissen G, Katinas G, Halberg F. Meta-analysis of sequential luteal-cycle-associated changes in human breast tissue. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000;63:171-3.
8. Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Slone S, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and change in mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:30-7.
9. Ursin G, Parisky YR, Pike MC, Spicer DV. Mammographic density changes during the menstrual cycle. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:141-2.
10. White E, Velentgas P, Mandelson MT, et al. Variation in mammographic breast density by time in menstrual cycle among women aged 40-49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:906-10.
11. Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 2008;246:376-83.
12. Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ. Automated analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 1996;41:909-23.
13. Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, et al. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002;359:909-19.
14. Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R, et al. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am 2004;42:793-806.
15. Moss SM, Cuckle H, Evans A, et al. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368:2053-60.
16. Ferguson DJP, Anderson TJ. Morphological evaluation of cell turnover in relation to the menstrual cycle in the "resting" human breast. Br J Cancer 1981;44:177-81.
17. Malini S, Smith EO, Goldzieher JW. Measurement of breast volume by ultrasound during normal menstrual cycles and with oral contraceptive use. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:538-41.
18. Fowler PA, Casey CE, Cameron GG, Foster MA, Knight CH. Cyclic changes in composition and volume of the breast during the menstrual cycle, measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:595-602.
19. Graham SJ, Bronskill MJ, Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Boyd NF. Quantitative correlation of breast tissue parameters usingmag netic resonance and X-ray mammography. Br J Cancer 1996;73:162-8.
20. Graham SJ, Stanchev PL, Lloyd-Smith JO, Bronskill MJ, Plewes DB. Changes in fibroglandular volume and water content of breast tissue during the menstrual cycle observed by MR imaging at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:695-701.
21. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773-83.
22. Harvey JA. Quantitative assessment of percent breast density: analog versus digital acquisition. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2004;3:611-6.
23. Olive D, Palter S. Reproductive physiology. In: Berek JS, editors. Berek & Novak's gynecology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p.172-81.
24. Chabbert BN, Djakoure C, Maitre SC, Bouchard P. Regulation of the human menstrual cycle. Front Neuroendocrinol 1998;19:151-86.