Objective analysis of classification behavior: Applications to scaling

Measurement and Representation of Sensations

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 159-201

  Balakrishnan, J D ^a  

^a California Center for Perception and Decision Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650378821     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203837610     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Balakrishnan, J. D. (1998a). Some more sensitive measures of sensitivity and response bias. Psychological Methods, 3, 68-90.
2. Balakrishnan, J. D. (1998b). Measures and interpretations of vigilance performance: Evidence against the detection criterion. Human Factors, 40, 601-623.
3. Balakrishnan, J. D. (1999). Decision processes in discrilnination: Fundalnental rnisrepresentations of signal detection theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25. 1-18.
4. Balakrishnan, J. D., & MacDonald, J. A. (2000). Effects of bias on the psychometric function: A model-free perspective. Purdue Quantitative Division Technical Report No. 31, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
5. Balakrishnan, J. D, & MacDonald, J. A. (2001). Misrepresentations of signal detection theory and an alternative approach to human manage classification. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 10. 376-384.
6. Balakrishnan, J. D., & MacDonald, J. A. (2004). Objective analysis of classification behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7. Balakrishnan, J. D. MacDonald, J. A., & Kohen, H. S. (2003). Is the area measure a historical anomaly? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 238256.
8. Baranski, J. V., & Petrusic, W. M. (1998). Probing the locus of confidence judgInents: ExperiIuents on the tiIlle to deterrnine confidence. Journal of Experirnental Psychology: Hurnan Perception & Performance, 24, 929-945.
9. Davies, D. R., & Parasuranlan, R. (1982). The psychology of vigilance. London: Acadelnic.
10. Diederich, H. (1997). Dynalnic stochastic Inodels for decision Making under time constraints. Journal of Mathernatical Psychology, 41, 260-274.
11. Dzhafarov, E. N. (2003a). Thurstonian-type representations for "sanle-different" discrhninations: Deternlinistic decisions and independent images. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 208-228.
12. Dzhafarov, E. N. (2003b). Thurstonian-type representations for "sanle-different" discriluinations: Probabilistic decisions and interdependent irnages. Journal of Mathernatical Psychology, 47, 229-243.
13. Dzhafarov, E. N. (2003c). Selective influence through conditional independence. Psychometrika, 68, 7-26.
14. Dzhafarov, E. N., & Colonius, H. (1999). Fechnerian Inetrics in unidiInensional and nntltidirnensional stiInulus spaces. Psychometric Bulletin and Review, 6, 239-268.
15. Dzhafarov, E. N., & Colonius, H. (2001). Multidimensional Fechneriall scaling: Basics. Jo'urnal of Mathenl,atical Psychology, 45, 670-719.
16. Dzhafarov, E. N., & Colonius, H. (2005). Psychophysics without physics: A purely psychological theory of Fechnerian Sca.ling in continuous stimulus spaces. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 49, 1-50.
17. Elnluerich, D. S., Gray, J. L., Watson, C. S., & Tanis, D. C. (1972). Response latency, confidence. and roes in auditory signal detection. Perception & Psychophyics, 11. 65-72.
18. Erlebacher, A. & Sekuler, R. (1971). Response frequency equalization: A bias model for psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 315-320.
19. Green, D. M., & Swets, J.A. (1974). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Huntington, NY: Krieger.
20. Hellström, Å. (1979). Tilne errors and differential sensation weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 460-477.
21. Hellström, Å. (1985). The Tillle-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive processes in comparing. Psychological Bulletin. 97. 35-61.
22. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.
23. John, I. D. (1975). A comnlon Inechanism nlediating the tilne-order error and the cross-over effect in conlparative judgnlents of loudness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 6, 51-60.
24. Katz, L. (1970). A comparison of Type II operating chara.cteristics derived front confidence ratings and from latencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 8. 65-68.
25. Kubovy, M. (1977). A possible basis for conservatisnl in signal detection and probabilistic categorization tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 277-281.
26. Link, S. W. (1992). The wave theory of difference and similarity. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27. Link, S. W., & Heath, R. A. (1975). A sequential theory of psychological discrilnination. Psychometrika, 40, 77-105.
28. Lockhead, G. R., & King, M. C. (1983). A memory model of sequential effects in scaling tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9. 461-473.
29. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Luce, R. D., & Galanter, E. (1963). Discrinlination. In R. D. Luce. R. Bush, & E. GalanteI' (Eds.). Handbook of mathematical psychology (vol. 1. pp. 191-243). New York: Wiley.
31. Luce, R. D., Nosofsky, R. M., Green, D.M. & Smith, A. F. (1982). The bow and sequential effects in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 397-408.
32. Maloney, L. T., & Thomas, E. A. C. (1991). Distributional assmptions and observed conservatism in the theory of signal detectability. Journal of Mathernatical Psychology, 35, 443-470.
33. Masin, S. C., & Agostini, A. (1990). Time errors in the method of pair comparisons. American Journal of Psychology. 108. 487-494.
34. Masin, S. C., & Fanton, V. (1989). An explanation for the presentation-order effect in the method of constant stinnIli. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 483-486.
35. McClelland, D. C. (1943). Factors influencing the time error in judgments of visual extents. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 33, 81-95.
36. Mori, S. (1998). Effects of stimulus inforlnation and nunlber of stinluli on sequential dependencies in absolute identification. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 72-83.
37. Petrusic, W. M., & Baranski, J. V. (1997). ContexL feedback, and the calibration and resolution of confidence in perceptual judglnents. American Journal of Psychology, 110, 543-572.
38. Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (2000). A diffusion model account of nlasking in two-choice letter identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 127-140.
39. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McCoon, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review, 106, 261-300.
40. Restle, F. (1961). Psychology of judgment and choice. New York: Wiley.
41. Shaw, J. S., McClure, K. A., & Wilkens, C. E. (2001). Recognition instructions and recognition practice can alter the confidence- response time relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 93-103.
42. Snlith, P. L. (2000). Stochastic dynamic models of response time and accuracy: A foundational prinler. Journal of Mathernatical Psychology, 44, 408-463.
43. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44. Treisman, M., & Williams, T. C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. Psychological Review, 91, 68-111.
45. Tresselt, M. E. (1944). Time errors in successive comparison of simple visual objects. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 555-558.
46. Van Zandt, T. (2000). ROC curves and confidence judgments in recognition memory. Journal of Experirnental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 582-600.
47. Vickers, D., Smith, P., Burt, J., & Brown, M. (1985). Experinlental paradignls emphasizing state or process limitations: II. Effects on confidence. Acta Psychologica, 59, 163-193.
48. Woodrow, H. (1935). The effect of practice upon time- order errors in the comparison of temporal intervals. Psychological Review, 42, 127-152.
49. Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.
50. Yates, J. F. (1990). Judgment and decision making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.