Pathology: Donor biopsy evaluation at time of renal grafting

Nature Reviews Nephrology

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 249-251

  Nickeleit, Volker ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; GLOMERULOSCLEROSIS; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HYALINE DEGENERATION; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY FIBROSIS; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY GRAFT; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCAR FORMATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT SURVEY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; BIOPSY; KIDNEY; LIVER RESECTION; NOTE; PATHOLOGY;

BIOPSY; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HEPATECTOMY; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION;

EID: 67650345579     PISSN: 17595061     EISSN: 1759507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2009.50     Document Type: Short Survey

References (15)

1. Munivenkatappa, R. B. et al. The Maryland aggregate pathology index: a deceased donor kidney biopsy scoring system for predicting graft failure. Am. J. Transplant. 8, 2316-2324 (2008).
2. Solez, K. et al. Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions. Am. J. Transplant. 8, 753-760 (2008). (Pubitemid 351347767)
3. Racusen, L. C. et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int. 55, 713-723 (1999).
4. Solez, K. et al. international standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: the Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Kidney Int. 44, 411-422 (1993).
5. Remuzzi, G. et al. Long-term outcome of renal transplantation from older donors. N. Engl. J. Med. 354, 343-352 (2006).
6. Fritsche, L. et al. Old-for-old kidney allocation allows successful expansion of the donor and recipient pool. Am. J. Transplant. 3, 1434-1439 (2003).
7. Segoloni, G. P. et al. Preferential allocation of marginal kidney allografts to elderly recipients combined with modified immunosuppression gives good results. Transplantation 80, 953-958 (2005).
8. Smits, J. M., Persijn, G. G., Van Houwelingen, H. C., Claas, F. H. & Frei, U. evaluation of the eurotransplant senior Program. The results of the first year. Am. J. Transplant. 2, 664-670 (2002).
9. Savoye, E., Tamarelle, D., Chalem, Y., Rebibou, J. M. & Tuppin, P. survival benefits of kidney transplantation with expanded criteria deceased donors in patients aged 60 years and over. Transplantation 84, 1618-1624 (2007).
10. Frei, U. et al. Prospective age-matching in elderly kidney transplant recipients-a 5-year analysis of the eurotransplant senior Program. Am. J. Transplant. 8, 50-57 (2008).
11. Haas, M., Ratner, L. E. & Montgomery, R. A. C4d staining of perioperative renal transplant biopsies. Transplantation 74, 711-717 (2002).
12. nickeleit, v. Pathology of renal transplantation. in Transplantation Pathology (ed. Ruiz, P.) 45-110 (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
13. Pascual, J., Marcén, R. & Ortuño, J. Clinical experience with everolimus (Certican) in elderly recipients: the "old-for-old" concept. Transplantation 79, s85-s88 (2005). (Pubitemid 40656651)
14. Gill, J. et al. Outcomes of kidney transplantation from older living donors to older recipients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 52, 541-552 (2008).
15. Arns, W., Citterio, F. & Campistol, J. M. 'Old-for-old'-new strategies for renal transplantation. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 22, 336-341 (2007).