Differences in curve behavior after fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with open triradiate cartilages

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 827-831

  Sponseller, Paul D ^a,i   Betz, Randal ^b   Newton, Peter O ^c   Lenke, Lawrence G ^d   Lowe, Tom ^e   Crawford, Alvin ^f   Sucato, Daniel ^g   Lonner, Barry ^h   Marks, Michelle ^c   Bastrom, Tracey ^c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Shriner's Hospital   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Woodridge Orthopaedics   (United States)

^f CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^h Scoliosis Associates   (United States)

ⁱ NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Fusion; Scoliosis; Triradiate cartilage

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CARTILAGE; CHILD; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INSTRUMENTATION; KYPHOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRIRADIATE CARTILAGE;

EID: 67650312825     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819139ef     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Sanders JO, Little DG, Richards BS. Prediction of the crankshaft phenomenon by peak height velocity. Spine 1997;22:1352-6.
2. Little DG, Song KM, Katz D, et al. Relationship of peak height velocity to other maturity indicators in idiopathic scoliosis in girls. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:685-93.
3. Dubousset J, Herring JA, Shufflebarger H. The crankshaft phenomenon. J Pediatr Orthop 1989;9:541-50.
4. Roberto RF, Lonstein JE, Winter RB, et al. Curve progression in Risser stage 0 or 1 patients after posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1997;17:718-25.
5. Lapinsky AS, Richards BS. Preventing the crankshaft phenomenon by combining anterior fusion with posterior instrumentation. Does it work? Spine 1995;20:1392-8.
6. Charles YP, Daures JP, de Rosa V, et al. Progression risk of idiopathic juvenile scoliosis during pubertal growth. Spine 2006;31:1933- 42.
7. Burton DC, Asher MA, Lai SM. Scoliosis correction maintenance in skele-tally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Is anterior fusion really necessary? Spine 2000;25:61-8.
8. D'Andrea LP, Betz RR, Lenke LG, et al. The effect of continued posterior spinal growth on sagittal contour in patients treated by anterior instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2000;25:813-7.
9. Shufflebarger HL, Clark CE. Prevention of the crankshaft phenomenon. Spine 1991;16:S409-11.
10. Lee CS, Nachemson AL. The crankshaft phenomenon after posterior Harrington fusion in skeletally immature patients with thoracic or thoracolumbar idiopathic scoliosis followed to maturity. Spine 1997;22:58-67.
11. Sanders JO, Browne RH, Cooney TE, et al. Correlates of the peak height velocity in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:2289-95.
12. Sanders JO, Browne RH, McConnell SJ, et al. Maturity assessment and curve progression in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:64-73.
13. Sanders JO. Maturity indicators in spinal deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:14-20.
14. Song KM, Little DG. Peak height velocity as a maturity indicator for males with idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2000;20:286-8.