Comparative study of navigated versus freehand osteochondral graft transplantation of the knee

American Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 803-807

  Koulalis, Dimitrios ^a,b   Di Benedetto, Paolo ^a,c   Citak, Mustafa ^a   O'Loughlin, Padhraig ^a   Pearle, Andrew D ^a   Kendoff, Daniel O ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Mosaicplasty; Navigation; Osteochondral lesion

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DONOR SITE; EXTRACTION; FEMUR; GRAFT RECIPIENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIBIA; CHONDROPLASTY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; KNEE; METHODOLOGY;

ARTHROPLASTY, SUBCHONDRAL; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 67650308940     PISSN: 03635465     EISSN: 15523365     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0363546508328111     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ahmad CS, Cohen ZA, Levine WN, Ateshian GA, Mow VC. Biomechanical and topographic considerations for autologous osteo-chondral grafting in the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:201-206.
2. Blevins FT, Steadman JR, Rodrigo JJ, Silliman J. Treatment of articular cartilage defects in athletes: an analysis of functional outcome and lesion appearance. Orthopedics. 1998;21:761-767.
3. Bobic V. Arthroscopic osteochondral autograft transplantation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996;3:262-264.
4. Brown TD, Pope DF, Hale JE, Buckwalter JA, Brand RA. Effects of osteochondral defect size on cartilage contact stress. J Orthop Res. 1991;9:559-567.
5. Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P, Franceschi JP, Djian P. Using navigation to measure rotation kinematics during ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:59-65.
6. Hangody L, Fules P. Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85 Suppl 2:25-32.
7. Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z, Udvarhelyi I, Szigeti I, Bely M. Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular cartilage defects: application in clinical practice. Orthopedics. 1998;21:751-756.
8. Hangody L, Rathonyi GK, Duska Z, Vasarhelyi G, Fules P, Modis L. Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86 Suppl 1:65-72.
9. Huang FS, Simonian PT, Norman AG, Clark JM. Effects of small incongruities in a sheep model of osteochondral autografting. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1842-1848.
10. Johnson-Nurse C, Dandy DJ. Fracture-separation of articular cartilage in the adult knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:42-43.
11. Khadem R, Yeh CC, Sadeghi-Tehrani M, et al. Comparative tracking error analysis of five different optical tracking systems. Comput Aided Surg. 2000;5:98-107.
12. Kock NB, Van Susante JL, Buma P, Van Kampen A, Verdonschot N. Press-fit stability of an osteochondral autograft: influence of different plug length and perfect depth alignment. Acta Orthop. 2006;77: 422-428.
13. Koh JL, Kowalski A, Lautenschlager E. The effect of angled osteo-chondral grafting on contact pressure: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:116-119.
14. Koh JL, Wirsing K, Lautenschlager E, Zhang LO. The effect of graft height mismatch on contact pressure following osteochondral grafting: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:317-320.
15. Lefkoe TP, Trafton PG, Ehrlich MG, et al. An experimental model of femoral condylar defect leading to osteoarthrosis. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7:458-467.
16. Lefkoe TP, Walsh WR, Anastasatos J, Ehrlich MG, Barrach HJ. Remodeling of articular step-offs: is osteoarthrosis dependent on defect size? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;314:253-265.
17. Li Q, Zamorano L, Jiang Z, et al. Effect of optical digitizer selection on the application accuracy of a surgical localization system: a quantitative comparison between the OPTOTRAK and flashpoint tracking systems. Comput Aided Surg. 1999;4:314-321.
18. Nelson BH, Anderson DD, Brand RA, Brown TD. Effect of osteochon-dral defects on articular cartilage: contact pressures studied in dog knees. Acta Orthop Scand. 1988;59:574-579.
19. Pearce SG, Hurtig MB, Clarnette R, Kalra M, Cowan B, Miniaci A. An investigation of 2 techniques for optimizing joint surface congruency using multiple cylindrical osteochondral autografts. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:50-55.
20. Robinson J, Carrat L, Granchi C, Colombet P. Influence of anterior cruciate ligament bundles on knee kinematics: clinical assessment using computer-assisted navigation. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35:2006-2013.
21. Thaunat M, Couchon S, Lunn J, Charrois O, Fallet L, Beaufils P. Cartilage thickness matching of selected donor and recipient sites for osteochondral autografting of the medial femoral condyle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:381-386.
22. Wu JZ, Herzog W, Hasler EM. Inadequate placement of osteochondral plugs may induce abnormal stress-strain distributions in articular cartilage: finite element simulations. Med Eng Phys. 2002;24:85-97.